Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs OCFC vs NFBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs OCFC vs NFBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $2.35B | $508M | $1.08B | $588M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $867M | $344M | $656M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $169M | $32M | $71M | $39M |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 72.1% | 44.1% | 54.5% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | -3.5% | 25.3% | 9.0% | 14.1% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 26.1x | 10.8x | 12.9x | 9.9x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.08B | $327M | $1.26B | $1.63B | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $289M | $185M | $167M | $135M | $168M |
CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs OCFC vs NFBK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Financial,… (CLBK) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs OCFC vs NFBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLBK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs OCFC's 45.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- PEG 1.53 vs OCFC's 3.57
- NIM 3.1% vs CLBK's 1.6%
KRNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.5%
- Beta 0.83, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.83 vs OCFC's 1.05
- 5.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, OCFC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NFBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -16.3%
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs OCFC's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.9% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs OCFC vs NFBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs OCFC vs NFBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
NFBK leads 1 • CLBK leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • OCFC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 3.5x NFBK's $251M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLBK's -2.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $867M | $344M | $656M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $241M | $43M | $103M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $169M | $32M | $71M | $39M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $64M | $225M | $40M | $80M | $42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +72.1% | +44.1% | +54.5% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +25.3% | +9.0% | +14.1% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +19.5% | +7.6% | +10.8% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +25.2% | +6.2% | +12.1% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +147.1% | +39.5% | +50.0% | -36.1% | +68.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 31% valuation discount to NFBK's 19.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs OCFC's 5.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $2.4B | $508M | $1.1B | $588M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $2.5B | $1.6B | $2.6B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -175.55x | 13.53x | 19.24x | 16.14x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.09x | 10.80x | 12.93x | 9.93x | 10.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.92x | — | 5.80x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.35x | 44.52x | 27.70x | 24.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.46x | 2.71x | 1.48x | 1.65x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.82x | 1.21x | 0.68x | 0.65x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.17x | 10.75x | 23.76x | 13.63x | 19.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for CLBK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs CLBK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | +9.5% | +4.3% | +4.3% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +1.1% | +0.4% | +0.5% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +7.9% | +1.1% | +2.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +2.4% | +1.5% | +2.7% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.17x | 1.68x | 0.98x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $791M | $142M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $592M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $289M | $185M | $167M | $135M | $168M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $327M | $1.3B | $1.6B | $760M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.06x | 1.05x | 0.22x | 0.33x | 0.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,989 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +37.9% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFBK at 18.3% vs CLBK's 7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.2% | +9.3% | +12.9% | +8.1% | +26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.3% | +9.0% | +37.9% | +20.5% | +31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.6% | +54.1% | +32.6% | +55.7% | +65.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.6% | +29.9% | -20.5% | +2.5% | +0.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.2% | +102.2% | -9.0% | +45.4% | +20.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.0% | +15.5% | +9.9% | +15.9% | +18.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRNY and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCFC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs OCFC's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.89x | 0.83x | 1.05x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.74 | $46.92 | $8.50 | $20.61 | $14.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.66 | $39.20 | $5.76 | $16.09 | $9.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +96.1% | +95.1% | +91.6% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 57.3 | 55.8 | 53.8 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 236K | 298K | 662K | 258K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and KRNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLBK as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold", NFBK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs -12.0% for CLBK (target: $17). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs NBTB's 3.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $46.00 | $9.50 | $19.67 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +5.5% | +4.5% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 | $0.44 | $0.84 | $0.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +7.6% | +3.2% |
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NFBK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CLBK vs NBTB vs KRNY vs OCFC vs NFBK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or OCFC or NFBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Financial, Inc. (CLBK) a "Hold" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or OCFC or NFBK?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or OCFC or NFBK?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -20. 5% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus KRNY's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or OCFC or NFBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning OCFC is approximately 26% more volatile than KRNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or OCFC or NFBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -131. 4% for Columbia Financial, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or OCFC or NFBK?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -2. 6% for Columbia Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -3. 5% for CLBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or OCFC or NFBK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Columbia Financial, Inc. — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 17. 6% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or OCFC or NFBK?
In this comparison, KRNY (5.
5% yield), OCFC (4. 5% yield), NFBK (3. 7% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CLBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLBK or NBTB or KRNY or OCFC or NFBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, CLBK: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLBK and NBTB and KRNY and OCFC and NFBK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NBTB, KRNY, OCFC, NFBK pay a dividend while CLBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.