Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs HOMB vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs HOMB vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $66M | $1.63B | $4.61B | $5.29B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $422M | $739M | $1.45B | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $103M | $243M | $458M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 61.0% | 70.8% | 65.6% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 29.8% | 36.8% | 36.0% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 28.9x | 14.4x | 15.9x | 10.8x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $184M | $197M | $1.20B | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $57M | $763M | $910M | $380M |
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs HOMB vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalyst Bancorp, I… (CLST) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 87.1 | -12.9% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 113.0 | +13.0% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs HOMB vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 55.3%, EPS growth 171.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 18.0%, current ratio 0.40x
- 55.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- Beta 0.02 vs SFNC's 1.02, lower leverage
LKFN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- 142.7% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 3.05 vs LKFN's 3.63
HOMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%
SFNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x)
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 55.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs SFNC's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.4% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs HOMB vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs HOMB vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 1 • CLST leads 1 • LKFN leads 0 • HOMB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FFIN and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 94.7x CLST's $15M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $422M | $739M | $1.5B | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $130M | $310M | $601M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $103M | $243M | $458M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $104M | $290M | $354M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +61.0% | +70.8% | +65.6% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +29.8% | +36.8% | +36.0% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +24.5% | +30.2% | +27.7% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +24.6% | +39.6% | +29.1% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.8% | +23.4% | -7.7% | +26.0% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 54% valuation discount to CLST's 28.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LKFN offers better value at 3.93x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $66M | $1.6B | $4.6B | $5.3B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55M | $1.8B | $4.0B | $5.6B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.88x | 15.61x | 20.76x | 13.36x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.42x | 15.92x | 10.82x | 10.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.93x | 3.98x | 4.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.02x | 13.49x | 14.17x | 10.12x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.28x | 3.87x | 6.23x | 3.64x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 2.12x | 2.89x | 1.36x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.18x | 15.72x | 15.73x | 12.53x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLST scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +14.2% | +13.3% | +10.9% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.5% | +1.6% | +2.0% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +11.6% | +11.0% | +7.2% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +15.8% | +16.0% | +9.8% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.24x | 0.12x | 0.30x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $127M | -$566M | $292M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $57M | $763M | $910M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $184M | $197M | $1.2B | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.82x | 1.48x | 1.44x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLST five years ago would be worth $11,925 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, CLST leads with a +40.4% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLST at 19.1% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +12.7% | +8.5% | -3.0% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.4% | +9.0% | -3.2% | -1.9% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.1% | +48.1% | +29.1% | +42.0% | +53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.2% | +10.5% | -28.2% | +6.6% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.2% | +142.7% | +145.4% | +58.2% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.1% | +14.0% | +8.9% | +12.4% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLST and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLST is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 0.79x | 0.95x | 0.82x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.16 | $69.40 | $38.74 | $30.83 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.52 | $54.36 | $28.11 | $25.68 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +90.2% | +83.6% | +87.1% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.4 | 60.9 | 58.2 | 50.3 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 153K | 740K | 1.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LKFN as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 5.4% for LKFN (target: $66). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs FFIN's 2.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $66.00 | $39.25 | $32.00 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 15 | 19 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 11 | 21 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.00 | $0.72 | $0.75 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CLST vs LKFN vs FFIN vs HOMB vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLST or LKFN or FFIN or HOMB or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the stronger pick with 55. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or HOMB or SFNC?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. at 28. 9x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. wins at 3. 05x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or HOMB or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) delivered a total return of +19. 2%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus CLST's +19. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or HOMB or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 5346% more volatile than CLST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or HOMB or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is pulling ahead at 55. 3% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 171. 8% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or HOMB or SFNC?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLST leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLST or LKFN or FFIN or HOMB or SFNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 05x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLST or LKFN or FFIN or HOMB or SFNC?
In this comparison, SFNC (4.
0% yield), LKFN (3. 2% yield), HOMB (2. 8% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CLST does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLST or LKFN or FFIN or HOMB or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLST: +19. 2%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLST and LKFN and FFIN and HOMB and SFNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CLST is a small-cap high-growth stock; LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. LKFN, FFIN, HOMB, SFNC pay a dividend while CLST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.