Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CMG vs TXRH vs DENN vs MCD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
CMG vs TXRH vs DENN vs MCD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $42.32B | $11.70B | $322M | $196.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.14B | $6.06B | $457M | $27.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.45B | $415M | $10M | $8.68B |
| Gross Margin | 36.1% | 18.7% | 43.8% | 57.4% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 8.2% | 8.4% | 46.0% |
| Forward P/E | 28.6x | 28.1x | 15.0x | 21.0x |
| Total Debt | $9.85B | $1.89B | $408M | $54.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $351M | $135M | $2M | $774M |
CMG vs TXRH vs DENN vs MCD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipotle Mexican Gr… (CMG) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 342.1 | +242.1% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
| McDonald's Corporat… (MCD) | 100 | 148.0 | +48.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMG vs TXRH vs DENN vs MCD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMG is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 16.0% ROA vs DENN's 2.0%, ROIC 15.3% vs 9.7%
TXRH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 331.7% 10Y total return vs CMG's 258.6%
- PEG 0.41 vs MCD's 1.54
- 9.4% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5%
DENN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +43.3% vs CMG's -36.9%
MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, current ratio 0.95x
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.95x
- 31.6% margin vs DENN's 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.1x vs 28.6x), PEG 0.41 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.6% margin vs DENN's 2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs CMG's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 27-year raise streak, vs TXRH's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs CMG's -36.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs DENN's 2.0%, ROIC 15.3% vs 9.7% |
CMG vs TXRH vs DENN vs MCD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMG vs TXRH vs DENN vs MCD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories
DENN leads 1 • TXRH leads 1 • CMG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.4B annually — 60.0x DENN's $457M. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DENN's 2.2%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.1B | $6.1B | $457M | $27.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $709M | $55M | $14.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $415M | $10M | $8.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $361M | $2M | $7.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.1% | +18.7% | +43.8% | +57.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +8.2% | +8.4% | +46.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +6.8% | +2.2% | +31.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +5.9% | +0.5% | +25.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +12.8% | +1.3% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.9% | +10.0% | -89.9% | +6.9% |
Valuation Metrics
DENN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 48% valuation discount to TXRH's 29.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.42x vs MCD's 1.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $42.3B | $11.7B | $322M | $196.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51.8B | $13.4B | $728M | $250.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.50x | 29.08x | 15.24x | 23.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.61x | 28.11x | 15.02x | 20.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.80x | 0.42x | — | 1.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.82x | 18.96x | 12.10x | 17.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.55x | 1.99x | 0.71x | 7.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.41x | 7.96x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.23x | 34.19x | 350.62x | 27.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CMG and DENN and MCD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMG delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $28 for TXRH. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMG's 3.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DENN scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +48.4% | +27.9% | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.0% | +12.2% | +2.0% | +14.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.3% | +14.5% | +9.7% | +18.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.4% | +20.1% | +11.9% | +23.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.48x | 1.27x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.5B | $1.8B | $406M | $54.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $351M | $135M | $2M | $774M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.8B | $1.9B | $408M | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 1.73x | 7.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $18,576 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,655 for DENN. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +43.3% total return vs CMG's -36.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 19.7% vs DENN's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.3% | +4.0% | +0.6% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.9% | +4.4% | +43.3% | -9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.1% | +71.7% | -41.3% | -0.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.7% | +85.8% | -63.5% | +29.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +258.6% | +331.7% | -42.9% | +151.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.2% | +19.7% | -16.3% | -0.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DENN and MCD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMG's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CMG's 55.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.75x | 0.65x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.42 | $199.99 | $6.26 | $341.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.75 | $153.82 | $3.36 | $274.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.6% | +88.7% | +99.8% | +80.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 42.9 | 66.9 | 30.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14.5M | 1.0M | 0 | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
MCD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMG as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold", DENN as "Buy", MCD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.6% upside for CMG (target: $44) vs 6.2% for TXRH (target: $188). For income investors, MCD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.59% vs TXRH's 1.53%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.72 | $188.36 | $7.00 | $347.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 67 | 43 | 21 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 0 | 27 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.71 | — | $7.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +1.3% | +3.6% | +1.0% |
MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). DENN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CMG vs TXRH vs DENN vs MCD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMG or TXRH or DENN or MCD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) a "Buy" — based on 67 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMG or TXRH or DENN or MCD?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 29. 1x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Texas Roadhouse, Inc. wins at 0. 41x versus McDonald's Corporation's 1. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMG or TXRH or DENN or MCD?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +85. 8%, compared to -63. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +331. 7% versus DENN's -42. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMG or TXRH or DENN or MCD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning CMG is approximately 828% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 3% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMG or TXRH or DENN or MCD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Denny's Corporation grew EPS 17. 1% year-over-year, compared to -5. 7% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMG or TXRH or DENN or MCD?
McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
9% net margin versus 4. 8% for Denny's Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus 8. 6% for TXRH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMG or TXRH or DENN or MCD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 41x versus McDonald's Corporation's 1. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMG: 34. 6% to $43. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMG or TXRH or DENN or MCD?
In this comparison, MCD (2.
6% yield), TXRH (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CMG, DENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMG or TXRH or DENN or MCD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +151. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +151. 6%, CMG: +258. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMG and TXRH and DENN and MCD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; MCD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TXRH, MCD pay a dividend while CMG, DENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.