Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CNXN vs CDW vs NSIT vs SNX vs SCSC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
CNXN vs CDW vs NSIT vs SNX vs SCSC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Information Technology Services | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $1.65B | $14.22B | $2.17B | $18.77B | $952M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.89B | $22.90B | $8.27B | $62.51B | $3.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $87M | $1.08B | $180M | $828M | $73M |
| Gross Margin | 18.8% | 21.6% | 22.0% | 6.5% | 13.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 7.3% | 4.8% | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 10.5x | 6.6x | 13.9x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $996K | $6.33B | $1.59B | $4.61B | $147M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $193M | $619M | $358M | $2.44B | $126M |
CNXN vs CDW vs NSIT vs SNX vs SCSC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) | 100 | 151.0 | +51.0% |
| CDW Corporation (CDW) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
| Insight Enterprises… (NSIT) | 100 | 137.3 | +37.3% |
| TD SYNNEX Corporati… (SNX) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
| ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) | 100 | 176.1 | +76.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNXN vs CDW vs NSIT vs SNX vs SCSC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNXN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.83, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.83 vs SCSC's 1.48, lower leverage
CDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 2.3%
- PEG 1.28 vs CNXN's 1.84
- 4.7% margin vs SNX's 1.3%
- 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NSIT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 11.0x)
SNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs CNXN's 199.0%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7%
- +103.2% vs NSIT's -47.2%
Among these 5 stocks, SCSC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 11.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs SNX's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs SCSC's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs NSIT's -47.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs NSIT's 2.0%, ROIC 15.4% vs 10.3% |
CNXN vs CDW vs NSIT vs SNX vs SCSC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNXN vs CDW vs NSIT vs SNX vs SCSC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDW leads in 3 of 6 categories
NSIT leads 1 • SNX leads 1 • CNXN leads 0 • SCSC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $62.5B annually — 21.6x CNXN's $2.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.7% (CDW) to 1.3% (SNX). On growth, SNX holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $22.9B | $8.3B | $62.5B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | $1.9B | $477M | $1.9B | $114M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $87M | $1.1B | $180M | $828M | $73M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | $1.1B | $235M | $1.4B | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +21.6% | +22.0% | +6.5% | +13.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +7.3% | +4.8% | +2.4% | +3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +4.7% | +2.2% | +1.3% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +4.7% | +2.8% | +2.2% | +4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +9.2% | +1.2% | +9.7% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +7.7% | +3.4% | +32.8% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
NSIT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, CDW trades at a 42% valuation discount to SNX's 23.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDW offers better value at 1.66x vs CNXN's 2.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $14.2B | $2.2B | $18.8B | $952M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $19.9B | $3.4B | $20.9B | $973M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.98x | 13.64x | 14.48x | 23.36x | 14.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.65x | 10.47x | 6.60x | 13.88x | 10.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.21x | 1.66x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.44x | 10.21x | 7.05x | 11.40x | 8.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 0.63x | 0.26x | 0.30x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.82x | 5.59x | 1.38x | 2.27x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.39x | 13.06x | 7.77x | 13.51x | 9.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW delivers a 42.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $8 for SCSC. CNXN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDW's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCSC scores 7/9 vs CDW's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +42.4% | +11.2% | +9.8% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +6.8% | +2.0% | +2.4% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +15.4% | +10.3% | +9.9% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +18.4% | +10.3% | +10.8% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 2.43x | 0.96x | 0.55x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$192M | $5.7B | $1.2B | $2.2B | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $193M | $619M | $358M | $2.4B | $126M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $996,000 | $6.3B | $1.6B | $4.6B | $147M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.25x | 2.97x | 3.96x | 11.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNX five years ago would be worth $19,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,954 for CDW. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.2% total return vs NSIT's -47.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 39.3% vs NSIT's -17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | -16.8% | -16.2% | +52.1% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.4% | -35.8% | -47.2% | +103.2% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.7% | -29.2% | -43.3% | +170.4% | +64.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.1% | -30.5% | -29.7% | +94.2% | +34.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.0% | +210.7% | +194.2% | +505.0% | +9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.8% | -10.9% | -17.2% | +39.3% | +18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNXN and SNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNXN is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCSC's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs NSIT's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.15x | 1.32x | 1.43x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.17 | $192.30 | $148.58 | $237.51 | $46.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $54.97 | $106.00 | $63.62 | $114.05 | $33.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.8% | +57.3% | +47.4% | +97.9% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 27.6 | 37.5 | 80.3 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 66K | 1.6M | 441K | 735K | 204K |
Analyst Outlook
CDW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNXN as "Buy", CDW as "Buy", NSIT as "Buy", SNX as "Buy", SCSC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for CDW (target: $162) vs -23.9% for SNX (target: $177). For income investors, CDW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs SNX's 0.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $162.40 | $90.00 | $177.00 | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 18 | 7 | 24 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +2.3% | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 | — | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $2.49 | — | $1.78 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | +4.6% | +7.0% | +3.3% | +11.2% |
CDW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NSIT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CNXN vs CDW vs NSIT vs SNX vs SCSC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNXN or CDW or NSIT or SNX or SCSC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger pick with 6.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). CDW Corporation (CDW) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNXN or CDW or NSIT or SNX or SCSC?
On trailing P/E, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the cheapest at 13.
6x versus TD SYNNEX Corporation at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CDW Corporation wins at 1. 28x versus PC Connection, Inc. 's 1. 84x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNXN or CDW or NSIT or SNX or SCSC?
Over the past 5 years, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) delivered a total return of +94.
2%, compared to -30. 5% for CDW Corporation (CDW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +505. 0% versus SCSC's +9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNXN or CDW or NSIT or SNX or SCSC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus ScanSource, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning SCSC is approximately 78% more volatile than CNXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for CDW Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNXN or CDW or NSIT or SNX or SCSC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is pulling ahead at 6.
9% versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TD SYNNEX Corporation grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -25. 8% for Insight Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNX leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNXN or CDW or NSIT or SNX or SCSC?
CDW Corporation (CDW) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
8% net margin versus 1. 3% for TD SYNNEX Corporation — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDW leads at 7. 4% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDW leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNXN or CDW or NSIT or SNX or SCSC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 28x versus PC Connection, Inc. 's 1. 84x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for PC Connection, Inc. — 10. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDW: 47. 4% to $162. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNXN or CDW or NSIT or SNX or SCSC?
In this comparison, CDW (2.
3% yield), CNXN (0. 9% yield), SNX (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NSIT, SCSC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNXN or CDW or NSIT or SNX or SCSC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 0. 9% yield, +199. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNXN: +199. 0%, SCSC: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNXN and CDW and NSIT and SNX and SCSC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDW is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NSIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCSC is a small-cap deep-value stock. CNXN, CDW, SNX pay a dividend while NSIT, SCSC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.