Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRMT vs LAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
CRMT vs LAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $106M | $6.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $37.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $711M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 15.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 5.5x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $845M | $14.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $342M |
CRMT vs LAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| America's Car-Mart,… (CRMT) | 100 | 16.1 | -83.9% |
| Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) | 100 | 241.5 | +141.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRMT vs LAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRMT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.84, current ratio 3.83x
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 8.5x)
LAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.0%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 264.5% 10Y total return vs CRMT's -49.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.0% revenue growth vs CRMT's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 8.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs CRMT's -11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs CRMT's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CRMT's 0.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.8% vs CRMT's -72.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs CRMT's -7.5%, ROIC 5.2% vs 5.2% |
CRMT vs LAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRMT vs LAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 36.3x CRMT's $1.0B. LAD is the more profitable business, keeping 1.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRMT's -11.8%. On growth, LAD holds the edge at +1.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $37.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | $711M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +15.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.7% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.2% | -46.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CRMT leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, CRMT trades at a 39% valuation discount to LAD's 9.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRMT's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LAD's 11.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $6.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $941M | $21.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.49x | 9.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.28x | 11.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 34.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRMT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAD delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-23 for CRMT. CRMT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAD's 2.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRMT scores 5/9 vs LAD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.6% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.5% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.48x | 2.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $835M | $14.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $342M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $845M | $14.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.18x | 2.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LAD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAD five years ago would be worth $7,904 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $842 for CRMT. Over the past 12 months, LAD leads with a -0.8% total return vs CRMT's -72.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LAD at 10.8% vs CRMT's -46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.3% | -12.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.6% | -0.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.9% | +35.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -21.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | +264.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.7% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
LAD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRMT's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAD currently trades 80.8% from its 52-week high vs CRMT's 20.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.72 | $360.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.63 | $239.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.4% | +80.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 150K | 313K |
Analyst Outlook
LAD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRMT as "Buy" and LAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.4% upside for LAD (target: $412) vs 9.5% for CRMT (target: $14). LAD is the only dividend payer here at 0.75% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $411.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $2.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +14.5% |
LAD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CRMT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
CRMT vs LAD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRMT or LAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) is the stronger pick with 4. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRMT or LAD?
On trailing P/E, America's Car-Mart, Inc.
(CRMT) is the cheapest at 5. 5x versus Lithia Motors, Inc. at 9. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRMT or LAD?
Over the past 5 years, Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) delivered a total return of -21. 0%, compared to -91. 6% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LAD returned +264. 5% versus CRMT's -49. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRMT or LAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus America's Car-Mart, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning CRMT is approximately 69% more volatile than LAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 148% versus 2% for Lithia Motors, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRMT or LAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) is pulling ahead at 4. 0% versus -0. 2% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: America's Car-Mart, Inc. grew EPS 147. 5% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Lithia Motors, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAD leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRMT or LAD?
Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 2% net margin versus 1. 3% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRMT leads at 6. 7% versus 3. 8% for LAD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRMT leads at 47. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRMT or LAD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAD: 41.
4% to $411. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRMT or LAD?
In this comparison, LAD (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CRMT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRMT or LAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 7% yield, +264. 5% 10Y return). America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAD: +264. 5%, CRMT: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRMT and LAD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LAD pays a dividend while CRMT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.