Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRMT vs LAD vs AN vs DRVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
CRMT vs LAD vs AN vs DRVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $106M | $6.64B | $7.05B | $2.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $37.73B | $27.49B | $2.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $711M | $679M | $-198M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 15.2% | 17.7% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 3.7% | 4.4% | -7.3% |
| Forward P/E | 5.5x | 8.5x | 9.7x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $845M | $14.69B | $10.18B | $4.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $342M | $59M | $170M |
CRMT vs LAD vs AN vs DRVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| America's Car-Mart,… (CRMT) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) | 100 | 91.4 | -8.6% |
| AutoNation, Inc. (AN) | 100 | 288.0 | +188.0% |
| Driven Brands Holdi… (DRVN) | 100 | 48.9 | -51.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRMT vs LAD vs AN vs DRVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRMT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 10.9x)
LAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.0%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- Beta 1.09, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.17x
- 4.0% revenue growth vs CRMT's -0.2%
AN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 324.6% 10Y total return vs LAD's 264.5%
- PEG 0.31 vs LAD's 0.80
- 2.5% margin vs CRMT's -11.8%
- +16.9% vs CRMT's -72.6%
DRVN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, current ratio 1.52x
- Beta 0.68 vs CRMT's 1.84
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.0% revenue growth vs CRMT's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs CRMT's -11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs CRMT's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CRMT's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.9% vs CRMT's -72.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs CRMT's -7.5%, ROIC 8.5% vs 5.2% |
CRMT vs LAD vs AN vs DRVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRMT vs LAD vs AN vs DRVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CRMT leads 1 • LAD leads 1 • DRVN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LAD and AN and DRVN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 36.3x CRMT's $1.0B. AN is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRMT's -11.8%. On growth, LAD holds the edge at +1.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $37.7B | $27.5B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $1.8B | $1.5B | $17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | $711M | $679M | -$198M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $1.9B | -$104M | $41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +15.2% | +17.7% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +3.7% | +4.4% | -7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | +1.9% | +2.5% | -9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +5.0% | -0.4% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.7% | +1.0% | -2.1% | -9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.2% | -46.1% | +33.0% | +5.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CRMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, CRMT trades at a 54% valuation discount to AN's 12.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AN offers better value at 0.38x vs LAD's 0.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $6.6B | $7.0B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $941M | $21.0B | $17.2B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.49x | 9.01x | 12.05x | -7.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.50x | 9.70x | 10.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.28x | 11.38x | 10.83x | 126.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.18x | 0.26x | 0.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 1.12x | 3.34x | 3.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 34.61x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AN delivers a 28.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-28 for DRVN. CRMT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DRVN's 6.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DRVN scores 6/9 vs AN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.6% | +10.6% | +28.4% | -28.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.5% | +2.9% | +4.8% | -4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +5.2% | +8.5% | -2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +8.2% | +17.2% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.48x | 2.22x | 4.35x | 6.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $835M | $14.3B | $10.1B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $342M | $59M | $170M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $845M | $14.7B | $10.2B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.18x | 2.34x | 4.53x | -1.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AN five years ago would be worth $19,409 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $842 for CRMT. Over the past 12 months, AN leads with a +16.9% total return vs CRMT's -72.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AN at 15.1% vs CRMT's -46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.3% | -12.2% | -0.6% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.6% | -0.8% | +16.9% | -24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.9% | +35.9% | +52.4% | -51.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -21.0% | +94.1% | -51.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | +264.5% | +324.6% | -48.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.7% | +10.8% | +15.1% | -21.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AN and DRVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DRVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRMT's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AN currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs CRMT's 20.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.09x | 0.85x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.72 | $360.56 | $228.92 | $19.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.63 | $239.78 | $174.34 | $9.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.4% | +80.8% | +89.7% | +69.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 60.6 | 53.7 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 150K | 313K | 412K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
LAD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRMT as "Buy", LAD as "Buy", AN as "Buy", DRVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.4% upside for LAD (target: $412) vs 9.5% for CRMT (target: $14). LAD is the only dividend payer here at 0.75% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $411.67 | $248.00 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 26 | 34 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +0.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $2.18 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +14.5% | +11.2% | 0.0% |
AN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CRMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CRMT vs LAD vs AN vs DRVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRMT or LAD or AN or DRVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) is the stronger pick with 4. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRMT or LAD or AN or DRVN?
On trailing P/E, America's Car-Mart, Inc.
(CRMT) is the cheapest at 5. 5x versus AutoNation, Inc. at 12. 0x. On forward P/E, Lithia Motors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AutoNation, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Lithia Motors, Inc. 's 0. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRMT or LAD or AN or DRVN?
Over the past 5 years, AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) delivered a total return of +94. 1%, compared to -91. 6% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AN returned +324. 6% versus CRMT's -49. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRMT or LAD or AN or DRVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
(DRVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus America's Car-Mart, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning CRMT is approximately 169% more volatile than DRVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 148% versus 7% for Driven Brands Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRMT or LAD or AN or DRVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) is pulling ahead at 4. 0% versus -0. 2% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: America's Car-Mart, Inc. grew EPS 147. 5% year-over-year, compared to 0. 7% for AutoNation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DRVN leads at 16. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRMT or LAD or AN or DRVN?
AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus -12. 5% for Driven Brands Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRMT leads at 6. 7% versus -6. 0% for DRVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DRVN leads at 52. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRMT or LAD or AN or DRVN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AutoNation, Inc. (AN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Lithia Motors, Inc. 's 0. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for Driven Brands Holdings Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LAD: 41. 4% to $411. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRMT or LAD or AN or DRVN?
In this comparison, LAD (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CRMT, AN, DRVN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRMT or LAD or AN or DRVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lithia Motors, Inc.
(LAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 0. 7% yield, +264. 5% 10Y return). America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAD: +264. 5%, CRMT: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRMT and LAD and AN and DRVN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; LAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; AN is a small-cap deep-value stock; DRVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LAD pays a dividend while CRMT, AN, DRVN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.