Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CSBR vs DBVT vs IMVT vs AGEN vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CSBR vs DBVT vs IMVT vs AGEN vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $84M | $1712.35T | $5.53B | $132M | $73.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $114M | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-168M | $-464M | $115K | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | 21.5% | — | — | 35.7% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | -5.6% | — | — | -17.7% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | — | — | 2.9x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $22M | $98K | $10M | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $194M | $714M | $3M | $3.12B |
CSBR vs DBVT vs IMVT vs AGEN vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Champions Oncology,… (CSBR) | 100 | 62.5 | -37.5% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 112.8 | +12.8% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CSBR vs DBVT vs IMVT vs AGEN vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CSBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.38
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 161.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.1%
- 13.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Beta 0.38 vs AGEN's 2.72
DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +110.4% vs CSBR's +3.1%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs REGN's 90.0%
AGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (2.9x vs 15.3x)
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- Beta 0.81, yield 0.5%, current ratio 4.13x
- 29.6% margin vs CSBR's -5.4%
- 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.9x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs CSBR's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs CSBR's +3.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
CSBR vs DBVT vs IMVT vs AGEN vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CSBR vs DBVT vs IMVT vs AGEN vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REGN leads in 1 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • CSBR leads 1 • IMVT leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSBR's -5.4%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $0 | $0 | $114M | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$112M | -$487M | -$10M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$168M | -$464M | $115,000 | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | -$151M | -$423M | -$159M | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | — | — | +35.7% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | — | — | -17.7% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | — | — | +0.1% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | — | — | -139.1% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | — | +27.5% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -106.5% | +91.5% | +19.7% | +85.3% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 6% valuation discount to CSBR's 18.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CSBR's 12.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $1712.35T | $5.5B | $132M | $73.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80M | $1712.35T | $4.8B | $140M | $73.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.15x | -0.76x | -9.97x | -1102.94x | 17.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 2.94x | 15.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.37x | — | — | — | 17.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.47x | — | — | 1.16x | 5.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 22.66x | 0.66x | 5.83x | — | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.99x | — | — | — | 18.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSBR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSBR's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSBR scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -56.5% | -130.2% | -47.1% | — | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.4% | -89.0% | -44.1% | +0.1% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | — | — | — | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +74.1% | -145.7% | -66.1% | — | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 0.13x | 0.00x | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$172M | -$714M | $7M | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $194M | $714M | $3M | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $22M | $98,000 | $10M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 179.48x | -189.82x | — | 1.11x | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $611 for AGEN. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs CSBR's +3.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 12.1% vs AGEN's -51.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | +4.9% | +5.1% | +16.1% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.1% | +110.4% | +96.1% | +27.1% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.4% | +19.7% | +40.9% | -88.2% | -5.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.9% | -69.1% | +62.4% | -93.9% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | -87.0% | +173.6% | -94.3% | +90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.0% | +6.2% | +12.1% | -51.0% | -1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSBR and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.26x | 1.36x | 2.58x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.63 | $26.18 | $30.09 | $7.34 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.50 | $7.53 | $13.36 | $2.71 | $476.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +76.3% | +90.5% | +51.1% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 48.8 | 44.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 252K | 1.4M | 814K | 631K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CSBR and AGEN and REGN each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 22.1% for REGN (target: $866). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $45.50 | $7.33 | $865.68 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 23 | 11 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +5.4% |
REGN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AGEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CSBR vs DBVT vs IMVT vs AGEN vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CSBR or DBVT or IMVT or AGEN or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champions Oncology, Inc.
(CSBR) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CSBR or DBVT or IMVT or AGEN or REGN?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Champions Oncology, Inc. at 18. 2x. On forward P/E, Agenus Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CSBR or DBVT or IMVT or AGEN or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -93. 9% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +190. 9% versus AGEN's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CSBR or DBVT or IMVT or AGEN or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Champions Oncology, Inc.
(CSBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning AGEN is approximately 382% more volatile than CSBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 162% for Champions Oncology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CSBR or DBVT or IMVT or AGEN or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champions Oncology, Inc.
(CSBR) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Champions Oncology, Inc. grew EPS 161. 1% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CSBR or DBVT or IMVT or AGEN or REGN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Immunovant, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -18. 0% for AGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGEN leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CSBR or DBVT or IMVT or AGEN or REGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 2. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CSBR or DBVT or IMVT or AGEN or REGN?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. CSBR, DBVT, IMVT, AGEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CSBR or DBVT or IMVT or AGEN or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Champions Oncology, Inc.
(CSBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSBR: +48. 6%, AGEN: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CSBR and DBVT and IMVT and AGEN and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CSBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.