Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CULP vs FLXS vs LOVE vs HNI vs RH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Business Equipment & Supplies
Specialty Retail
CULP vs FLXS vs LOVE vs HNI vs RH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Business Equipment & Supplies | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $46M | $295M | $228M | $1.70B | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $201M | $458M | $690M | $3.59B | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $22M | $13M | $-15M | $110M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 23.2% | 57.7% | 39.9% | 44.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 6.1% | 6.3% | 4.6% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.9x | 25.7x | 8.6x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $59M | $183M | $1.63B | $3.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $40M | $84M | $209M | $30M |
CULP vs FLXS vs LOVE vs HNI vs RH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Culp, Inc. (CULP) | 100 | 46.7 | -53.3% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 555.5 | +455.5% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| HNI Corporation (HNI) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
| Rh (RH) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CULP vs FLXS vs LOVE vs HNI vs RH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CULP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 30.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.71 vs RH's 2.36
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs HNI's 9.3%
- 4.8% margin vs CULP's -3.6%
- +80.1% vs RH's -29.3%
LOVE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HNI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 3.7%
- Beta 1.07, yield 3.7%, current ratio 1.24x
- 12.4% revenue growth vs CULP's -5.4%
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 19.3x)
Among these 5 stocks, RH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs CULP's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs CULP's -3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs RH's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.1% vs RH's -29.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs CULP's -5.9%, ROIC 9.9% vs -9.6% |
CULP vs FLXS vs LOVE vs HNI vs RH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CULP vs FLXS vs LOVE vs HNI vs RH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLXS leads in 3 of 6 categories
CULP leads 0 • LOVE leads 0 • HNI leads 0 • RH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HNI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 17.9x CULP's $201M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CULP's -3.6%. On growth, HNI holds the edge at +124.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $201M | $458M | $690M | $3.6B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $31M | $58M | $323M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $22M | $13M | -$15M | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $28M | -$11M | $8M | $128M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +23.2% | +57.7% | +39.9% | +44.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +6.1% | +6.3% | +4.6% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +4.8% | +1.9% | -0.4% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +6.1% | -1.5% | +0.2% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | +9.8% | +2.5% | +124.7% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | -27.2% | -18.4% | -100.0% | +10.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CULP and HNI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 58% valuation discount to RH's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HNI's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RH's 14.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $295M | $228M | $1.7B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $314M | $327M | $3.1B | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.35x | 15.54x | 22.64x | 31.26x | 36.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.90x | 25.68x | 8.57x | 19.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 12.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.38x | 11.54x | 9.01x | 14.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 0.67x | 0.34x | 0.60x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 1.87x | 1.21x | 0.92x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.74x | 13.06x | 8.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RH delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CULP. CULP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HNI's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs CULP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.3% | +12.2% | +6.5% | -1.2% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | +7.5% | +2.6% | -0.5% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.6% | +9.9% | +3.3% | +7.8% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.6% | +12.3% | +3.6% | +9.3% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.35x | 0.85x | 0.89x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $19M | $99M | $1.4B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $40M | $84M | $209M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $59M | $183M | $1.6B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -39.03x | 380.21x | — | 2.01x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,908 for RH. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs RH's -29.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs RH's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +38.7% | +8.2% | -17.7% | -30.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | +80.1% | -23.5% | -17.7% | -29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.4% | +242.4% | -40.1% | +42.6% | -48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.6% | +19.5% | -78.4% | -7.3% | -80.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.0% | +51.4% | -34.9% | +9.3% | +257.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.4% | +50.7% | -15.7% | +12.5% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CULP and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CULP is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RH's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs RH's 52.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.51x | 1.33x | 1.07x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.80 | $59.95 | $21.90 | $53.29 | $257.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.93 | $29.38 | $10.33 | $31.41 | $106.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +92.0% | +71.3% | +65.1% | +52.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.8 | 60.4 | 53.7 | 34.4 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 47K | 299K | 743K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CULP and HNI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LOVE as "Buy", HNI as "Buy", RH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.8% upside for HNI (target: $95) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, HNI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.72% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 | $22.50 | $95.00 | $208.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 11 | 3 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | +3.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 | — | $1.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.0% | +8.7% | +4.9% | +0.5% |
FLXS leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
CULP vs FLXS vs LOVE vs HNI vs RH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CULP or FLXS or LOVE or HNI or RH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HNI Corporation (HNI) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Culp, Inc. (CULP). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CULP or FLXS or LOVE or HNI or RH?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Rh at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, HNI Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CULP or FLXS or LOVE or HNI or RH?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -80. 9% for Rh (RH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RH returned +257. 5% versus CULP's -76. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CULP or FLXS or LOVE or HNI or RH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Culp, Inc.
(CULP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Rh's 2. 36β — meaning RH is approximately 230% more volatile than CULP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Culp, Inc. (CULP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 89% for HNI Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CULP or FLXS or LOVE or HNI or RH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HNI Corporation (HNI) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -5. 4% for Culp, Inc. (CULP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -61. 5% for HNI Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CULP or FLXS or LOVE or HNI or RH?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -9. 0% for Culp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RH leads at 10. 1% versus -4. 2% for CULP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOVE leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CULP or FLXS or LOVE or HNI or RH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HNI Corporation (HNI) trades at 8.
6x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HNI: 173. 8% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CULP or FLXS or LOVE or HNI or RH?
In this comparison, HNI (3.
7% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CULP, LOVE, RH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CULP or FLXS or LOVE or HNI or RH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HNI Corporation (HNI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 3. 7% yield). Rh (RH) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNI: +9. 3%, RH: +257. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CULP and FLXS and LOVE and HNI and RH?
These companies operate in different sectors (CULP (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical) and HNI (Industrials) and RH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CULP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FLXS, HNI pay a dividend while CULP, LOVE, RH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.