Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CURR vs RPAY vs EVTC vs RELY vs FLYW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
CURR vs RPAY vs EVTC vs RELY vs FLYW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $330M | $307M | $1.44B | $4.80B | $2.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $313M | $951M | $1.73B | $188.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $-259M | $133M | $106M | $12.54B |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 55.4% | 46.4% | 43.6% | 0.2% |
| Operating Margin | -59.0% | -35.9% | 19.1% | 6.9% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 3.8x | 6.1x | 39.7x | 41.5x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $437M | $1.13B | $220M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $116M | $306M | $542M | $330M |
CURR vs RPAY vs EVTC vs RELY vs FLYW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Currenc Group, Inc. (CURR) | 100 | 612.3 | +512.3% |
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 52.5 | -47.5% |
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 65.5 | -34.5% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CURR vs RPAY vs EVTC vs RELY vs FLYW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CURR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06
- 110.2% 10Y total return vs EVTC's 89.5%
- Beta 0.06 vs RPAY's 1.57
- +242.1% vs EVTC's -31.9%
RPAY is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (3.8x vs 41.5x)
EVTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.76, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.07x
- 13.9% margin vs CURR's -85.0%
- 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
RELY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 3.30x
- 29.4% revenue growth vs CURR's -12.8%
- 8.1% ROA vs CURR's -34.0%
Among these 5 stocks, FLYW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs CURR's -12.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.8x vs 41.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs CURR's -85.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs RPAY's 1.57 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +242.1% vs EVTC's -31.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs CURR's -34.0% |
CURR vs RPAY vs EVTC vs RELY vs FLYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CURR vs RPAY vs EVTC vs RELY vs FLYW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RPAY leads in 1 of 6 categories
RELY leads 1 • CURR leads 1 • EVTC leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RPAY and EVTC and FLYW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 4061.6x CURR's $46M. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CURR's -85.0%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $313M | $951M | $1.7B | $188.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$10M | $316M | $149M | $10.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | -$259M | $133M | $106M | $12.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $61M | $145M | $256M | -$15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +55.4% | +46.4% | +43.6% | +0.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.0% | -35.9% | +19.1% | +6.9% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -85.0% | -82.7% | +13.9% | +6.1% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +19.4% | +15.2% | +14.8% | -8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.5% | +8.4% | +25.2% | +1408.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +139.7% | -34.4% | -24.0% | +3.6% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RPAY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 93% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RPAY's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $330M | $307M | $1.4B | $4.8B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $289M | $629M | $2.3B | $4.5B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.18x | -1.16x | 10.62x | 73.52x | 161.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.83x | 6.14x | 39.71x | 41.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.18x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.98x | 7.34x | 41.98x | 47.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.11x | 0.99x | 1.54x | 2.94x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.62x | 2.11x | 5.71x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 114.91x | 3.37x | 10.62x | 16.24x | 21.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RELY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-47 for RPAY. RELY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EVTC's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs RPAY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -46.6% | +18.7% | +12.7% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -34.0% | -20.3% | +6.1% | +8.1% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -1.0% | +10.2% | +14.2% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -1.0% | +10.5% | +9.4% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.91x | 1.58x | 0.25x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | $321M | $824M | -$322M | -$330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $116M | $306M | $542M | $330M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $437M | $1.1B | $220M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.70x | -36.81x | 3.10x | 16.25x | 1.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CURR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CURR five years ago would be worth $52,606 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,624 for RPAY. Over the past 12 months, CURR leads with a +242.1% total return vs EVTC's -31.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURR at 2.1% vs RPAY's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +127.4% | -3.6% | -18.4% | +72.4% | +27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +242.1% | -7.9% | -31.9% | +8.1% | +62.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2858.1% | -44.3% | -31.7% | +25.4% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +426.1% | -83.8% | -43.3% | -53.0% | -49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | -63.8% | +89.5% | -53.0% | -49.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | -17.7% | -11.9% | +7.8% | -15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CURR and FLYW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CURR is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RPAY's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs RPAY's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.13x | 1.46x | 0.77x | 1.13x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.68 | $6.06 | $38.56 | $24.71 | $18.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $2.30 | $22.83 | $12.08 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +57.6% | +60.6% | +92.2% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 48.9 | 40.6 | 85.3 | 83.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 164K | 2.0M | 431K | 3.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CURR and EVTC each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RPAY as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", RELY as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.5% upside for RPAY (target: $6) vs -18.8% for CURR (target: $4). EVTC is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $5.60 | $34.00 | $23.50 | $18.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 18 | 13 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.20 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.5% | +4.8% | +1.1% | +3.7% |
RPAY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). RELY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CURR vs RPAY vs EVTC vs RELY vs FLYW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CURR or RPAY or EVTC or RELY or FLYW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 8% for Currenc Group, Inc. (CURR). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CURR or RPAY or EVTC or RELY or FLYW?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Repay Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CURR or RPAY or EVTC or RELY or FLYW?
Over the past 5 years, Currenc Group, Inc.
(CURR) delivered a total return of +426. 1%, compared to -83. 8% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CURR returned +118. 0% versus RPAY's -63. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CURR or RPAY or EVTC or RELY or FLYW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Currenc Group, Inc.
(CURR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Flywire Corporation's 1. 48β — meaning FLYW is approximately 1084% more volatile than CURR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 158% for EVERTEC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CURR or RPAY or EVTC or RELY or FLYW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus -12. 8% for Currenc Group, Inc. (CURR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -26. 3% for Repay Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELY leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CURR or RPAY or EVTC or RELY or FLYW?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -85. 0% for Currenc Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus -59. 0% for CURR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPAY leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CURR or RPAY or EVTC or RELY or FLYW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) trades at 3.
8x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPAY: 60. 5% to $5. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — CURR or RPAY or EVTC or RELY or FLYW?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. CURR, RPAY, RELY, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CURR or RPAY or EVTC or RELY or FLYW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Currenc Group, Inc.
(CURR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), +118. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CURR: +118. 0%, FLYW: -50. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CURR and RPAY and EVTC and RELY and FLYW?
These companies operate in different sectors (CURR (Financial Services) and RPAY (Technology) and EVTC (Technology) and RELY (Technology) and FLYW (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CURR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RPAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock. EVTC pays a dividend while CURR, RPAY, RELY, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.