Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs MDLZ vs AVO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CVGW
Calavo Growers, Inc.

Food Distribution

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$495M
5Y Perf.-27.6%
FRSH
Freshworks Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.50B
5Y Perf.-78.8%
DOLE
Dole plc

Agricultural Farm Products

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • IE
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-12.8%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.

Food Confectioners

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$78.70B
5Y Perf.+5.4%
AVO
Mission Produce, Inc.

Food Distribution

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$942M
5Y Perf.-27.6%

CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs MDLZ vs AVO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CVGW logoCVGW
FRSH logoFRSH
DOLE logoDOLE
MDLZ logoMDLZ
AVO logoAVO
IndustryFood DistributionSoftware - ApplicationAgricultural Farm ProductsFood ConfectionersFood Distribution
Market Cap$495M$2.50B$1.41B$78.70B$942M
Revenue (TTM)$616M$871M$9.17B$39.30B$1.34B
Net Income (TTM)$18M$180M$51M$2.61B$33M
Gross Margin10.2%85.0%7.8%28.8%12.0%
Operating Margin2.1%1.8%2.5%9.4%4.8%
Forward P/E19.6x15.9x10.7x20.1x20.2x
Total Debt$23M$67M$0.00$22.40B$201M
Cash & Equiv.$61M$632M$268M$2.13B$65M

CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs MDLZ vs AVOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CVGW
FRSH
DOLE
MDLZ
AVO
StockSep 21May 26Return
Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW)10072.4-27.6%
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH)10021.2-78.8%
Dole plc (DOLE)10087.2-12.8%
Mondelez Internatio… (MDLZ)100105.4+5.4%
Mission Produce, In… (AVO)10072.4-27.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs MDLZ vs AVO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FRSH leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Mondelez International, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. DOLE and AVO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CVGW
Calavo Growers, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CVGW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 2.47x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
FRSH
Freshworks Inc.
The Growth Play

FRSH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth 296.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
  • 16.4% revenue growth vs CVGW's -2.0%
  • 20.7% margin vs DOLE's 0.6%
  • 11.9% ROA vs DOLE's 1.2%, ROIC 2.0% vs 9.3%
Best for: growth exposure
DOLE
Dole plc
The Value Play

DOLE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (10.7x vs 20.2x)
Best for: value
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
The Income Pick

MDLZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 3.1%
  • 68.4% 10Y total return vs DOLE's 12.0%
  • Beta 0.06, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Beta 0.06 vs FRSH's 1.15
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
AVO
Mission Produce, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

AVO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +29.8% vs FRSH's -36.5%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFRSH logoFRSH16.4% revenue growth vs CVGW's -2.0%
ValueDOLE logoDOLELower P/E (10.7x vs 20.2x)
Quality / MarginsFRSH logoFRSH20.7% margin vs DOLE's 0.6%
Stability / SafetyMDLZ logoMDLZBeta 0.06 vs FRSH's 1.15
DividendsMDLZ logoMDLZ3.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DOLE's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AVO logoAVO+29.8% vs FRSH's -36.5%
Efficiency (ROA)FRSH logoFRSH11.9% ROA vs DOLE's 1.2%, ROIC 2.0% vs 9.3%

CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs MDLZ vs AVO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CVGWCalavo Growers, Inc.
FY 2025
Fresh products
100.0%$577M
FRSHFreshworks Inc.
FY 2025
Professional Services
100.0%$9M
DOLEDole plc

Segment breakdown not available.

MDLZMondelez International, Inc.
FY 2025
Biscuits
47.7%$18.4B
Chocolate
32.9%$12.7B
Gum and Candy
10.5%$4.1B
Cheese and Grocery
6.2%$2.4B
Beverages
2.6%$1.0B
AVOMission Produce, Inc.
FY 2025
Avocado
85.9%$1.2B
Blueberry
6.7%$93M
Mango
6.2%$86M
Other
1.2%$16M

CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs MDLZ vs AVO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFRSHLAGGINGAVO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FRSH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MDLZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 63.8x CVGW's $616M. FRSH is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOLE's 0.6%. On growth, FRSH holds the edge at +16.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…FRSH logoFRSHFreshworks Inc.DOLE logoDOLEDole plcMDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…AVO logoAVOMission Produce, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$616M$871M$9.2B$39.3B$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$19M$41M$337M$4.9B$91M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$18M$180M$51M$2.6B$33M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$15M$254M-$31M$2.6B$38M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.2%+85.0%+7.8%+28.8%+12.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.1%+1.8%+2.5%+9.4%+4.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.9%+20.7%+0.6%+6.6%+2.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.4%+29.2%-0.3%+6.6%+2.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-20.8%+16.5%+9.2%+8.2%-16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-84.0%+93.2%+38.7%-118.2%
FRSH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

DOLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.3x trailing earnings, FRSH trades at a 56% valuation discount to MDLZ's 32.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DOLE's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRSH's 27.1x.

MetricCVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…FRSH logoFRSHFreshworks Inc.DOLE logoDOLEDole plcMDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…AVO logoAVOMission Produce, …
Market CapShares × price$495M$2.5B$1.4B$78.7B$942M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$457M$1.9B$1.1B$99.0B$1.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS24.95x14.33x27.90x32.44x25.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.65x15.87x10.68x20.06x20.15x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.76x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.88x27.13x3.43x19.88x10.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.76x2.98x0.15x2.04x0.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.38x2.57x1.02x3.07x1.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF25.53x10.18x822.22x24.33x25.33x
DOLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FRSH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FRSH delivers a 18.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $4 for DOLE. FRSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MDLZ's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVGW scores 7/9 vs DOLE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…FRSH logoFRSHFreshworks Inc.DOLE logoDOLEDole plcMDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…AVO logoAVOMission Produce, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.5%+18.5%+3.7%+10.0%+5.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.8%+11.9%+1.2%+3.7%+3.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.6%+2.0%+9.3%+6.0%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.5%+1.2%+7.8%+7.3%+8.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977456
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.06x0.87x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$38M-$566M-$268M$20.3B$136M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$61M$632M$268M$2.1B$65M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$23M$67M$0$22.4B$201M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense42.51x3.51x10.01x10.85x
FRSH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — DOLE and MDLZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MDLZ five years ago would be worth $11,260 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,899 for FRSH. Over the past 12 months, AVO leads with a +29.8% total return vs FRSH's -36.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOLE at 9.0% vs FRSH's -12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…FRSH logoFRSHFreshworks Inc.DOLE logoDOLEDole plcMDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…AVO logoAVOMission Produce, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+29.8%-22.2%+1.6%+15.2%+14.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+10.2%-36.5%+3.7%-5.8%+29.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-4.1%-33.0%+29.6%-14.5%+11.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.3%-81.0%+12.0%+12.6%-33.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.5%-81.0%+12.0%+68.4%-3.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.4%-12.5%+9.0%-5.1%+3.7%
Evenly matched — DOLE and MDLZ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CVGW and MDLZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MDLZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRSH's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVGW currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs FRSH's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…FRSH logoFRSHFreshworks Inc.DOLE logoDOLEDole plcMDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…AVO logoAVOMission Produce, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.44x1.15x0.11x0.06x0.32x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.98$16.14$16.57$71.15$15.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$18.40$6.79$12.52$51.20$10.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.6%+55.9%+89.2%+86.2%+85.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.557.448.168.747.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded284K7.8M697K9.0M925K
Evenly matched — CVGW and MDLZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MDLZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CVGW as "Buy", FRSH as "Buy", DOLE as "Buy", MDLZ as "Buy", AVO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.9% upside for AVO (target: $19) vs -2.5% for CVGW (target: $27). For income investors, MDLZ offers the higher dividend yield at 3.13% vs DOLE's 2.23%.

MetricCVGW logoCVGWCalavo Growers, I…FRSH logoFRSHFreshworks Inc.DOLE logoDOLEDole plcMDLZ logoMDLZMondelez Internat…AVO logoAVOMission Produce, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.00$11.43$16.67$67.00$19.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts10188416
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%+2.2%+3.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12123
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.80$0.33$1.92
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+15.5%0.0%+3.0%+0.6%
MDLZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FRSH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DOLE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallFreshworks Inc. (FRSH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CVGW vs FRSH vs DOLE vs MDLZ vs AVO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or MDLZ or AVO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Freshworks Inc.

(FRSH) is the stronger pick with 16. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or MDLZ or AVO?

On trailing P/E, Freshworks Inc.

(FRSH) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Mondelez International, Inc. at 32. 4x. On forward P/E, Dole plc is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or MDLZ or AVO?

Over the past 5 years, Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) delivered a total return of +12. 6%, compared to -81. 0% for Freshworks Inc. (FRSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDLZ returned +68. 4% versus FRSH's -81. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or MDLZ or AVO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Freshworks Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning FRSH is approximately 1857% more volatile than MDLZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 87% for Mondelez International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or MDLZ or AVO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freshworks Inc.

(FRSH) is pulling ahead at 16. 4% versus -2. 0% for Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calavo Growers, Inc. grew EPS 1950% year-over-year, compared to -59. 5% for Dole plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRSH leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or MDLZ or AVO?

Freshworks Inc.

(FRSH) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus 0. 6% for Dole plc — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDLZ leads at 9. 4% versus 1. 6% for FRSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRSH leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or MDLZ or AVO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Dole plc (DOLE) trades at 10.

7x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Mission Produce, Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVO: 42. 9% to $19. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or MDLZ or AVO?

In this comparison, MDLZ (3.

1% yield), CVGW (2. 9% yield), DOLE (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FRSH, AVO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CVGW or FRSH or DOLE or MDLZ or AVO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Mondelez International, Inc.

(MDLZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDLZ: +68. 4%, FRSH: -81. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CVGW and FRSH and DOLE and MDLZ and AVO?

These companies operate in different sectors (CVGW (Consumer Defensive) and FRSH (Technology) and DOLE (Consumer Defensive) and MDLZ (Consumer Defensive) and AVO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CVGW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FRSH is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOLE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AVO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CVGW, DOLE, MDLZ pay a dividend while FRSH, AVO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CVGW

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FRSH

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DOLE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MDLZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AVO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CVGW and FRSH and DOLE and MDLZ and AVO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CVGW: -20.8% · FRSH: 16.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(CVGW: 2.9% · FRSH: 20.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CVGW: 25.0x · FRSH: 14.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.