Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CYTK vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CYTK vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $9.47B | $4.55B | $2.57B | $9.01B | $3.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $106M | $634M | $669M | $417M | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-830M | $-27M | $-609M | $225M | $376M |
| Gross Margin | 90.3% | 87.9% | 83.6% | 92.8% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | 5.2% | -83.9% | 42.8% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.6x | — | 39.4x | 55.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.28B | $483M | $1.28B | $9M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $882M | $214M | $434M | $496M | $178M |
CYTK vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cytokinetics, Incor… (CYTK) | 100 | 371.4 | +271.4% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 594.7 | +494.7% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CYTK vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CYTK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 4.53x
- 376.6% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9%
FOLD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- beta 0.61
- Beta 0.61 vs RARE's 1.36
- +138.3% vs RARE's -27.4%
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KRYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 128.0%
- 27.7% 10Y total return vs CYTK's 8.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
- Better valuation composite
ACAD is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 26.2% ROA vs CYTK's -61.9%, ROIC 10.0% vs -305.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 376.6% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.9% margin vs CYTK's -7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs RARE's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.3% vs RARE's -27.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs CYTK's -61.9%, ROIC 10.0% vs -305.3% |
CYTK vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CYTK vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACAD leads 1 • FOLD leads 1 • CYTK leads 0 • RARE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 10.4x CYTK's $106M. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CYTK's -7.8%. On growth, CYTK holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $106M | $634M | $669M | $417M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$633M | $40M | -$536M | $185M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$830M | -$27M | -$609M | $225M | $376M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$549M | $30M | -$487M | $237M | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.3% | +87.9% | +83.6% | +92.8% | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +5.2% | -83.9% | +42.8% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | -4.3% | -91.0% | +53.9% | +34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +4.7% | -72.8% | +56.9% | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | +23.7% | -2.4% | +31.9% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.8% | -89.0% | -17.2% | +52.5% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 78% valuation discount to KRYS's 44.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.5B | $4.5B | $2.6B | $9.0B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.9B | $4.8B | $3.4B | $8.5B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.76x | -164.85x | -4.48x | 44.69x | 9.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.62x | — | 39.44x | 55.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 114.88x | — | 50.79x | 26.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 107.59x | 7.17x | 3.82x | 23.16x | 3.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.29x | — | 7.51x | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 152.43x | — | 47.71x | 36.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs CYTK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -12.0% | -6.1% | +19.3% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -61.9% | -3.2% | -45.8% | +17.6% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +5.3% | -89.4% | +18.0% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -50.1% | +5.1% | -46.4% | +14.8% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.76x | — | 0.01x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $402M | $269M | $842M | -$487M | -$126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $882M | $214M | $434M | $496M | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $483M | $1.3B | $9M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.39x | 1.00x | -14.49x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $46,397 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,391 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +138.3% total return vs RARE's -27.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 51.7% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.6% | +1.5% | +10.7% | +23.8% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +136.8% | +138.3% | -27.4% | +122.9% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.2% | +19.0% | -44.5% | +248.8% | +3.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.0% | +54.3% | -76.1% | +364.0% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +849.5% | +119.2% | -59.4% | +2773.2% | -23.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | +6.0% | -17.8% | +51.7% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.61x | 1.36x | 1.02x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.20 | $14.50 | $42.37 | $306.10 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.31 | $5.51 | $18.29 | $122.80 | $14.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +99.9% | +61.6% | +99.9% | +80.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 72.2 | 67.7 | 68.0 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 2.9M | 1.8M | 269K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CYTK as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.62 | $14.50 | $48.36 | $326.20 | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 24 | 33 | 17 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACAD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CYTK vs FOLD vs RARE vs KRYS vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CYTK or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) is the stronger pick with 376.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CYTK or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 44. 7x. On forward P/E, Krystal Biotech, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CYTK or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +364. 0%, compared to -76. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +27. 7% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CYTK or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RARE is approximately 123% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CYTK or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) is pulling ahead at 376.
6% versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -24. 3% for Cytokinetics, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CYTK or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -891. 6% for Cytokinetics, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -695. 4% for CYTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CYTK or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) trades at 39. 4x forward P/E versus 55. 6x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 16. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 85. 1% to $48. 36.
08Which pays a better dividend — CYTK or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CYTK or FOLD or RARE or KRYS or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), +849. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CYTK: +849. 5%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CYTK and FOLD and RARE and KRYS and ACAD?
Both stocks operate in the null sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CYTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.