Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DCBO vs SKIL vs SAP vs WDAY vs CRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
DCBO vs SKIL vs SAP vs WDAY vs CRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Education & Training Services | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $584M | $75M | $200.87B | $33.95B | $179.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $236M | $516M | $36.80B | $9.55B | $41.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $-134M | $7.04B | $693M | $7.46B |
| Gross Margin | 80.4% | 80.1% | 73.8% | 75.7% | 77.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | -15.8% | 26.7% | 8.9% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | — | 23.6x | 11.7x | 15.4x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $589M | $8.07B | $834M | $6.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $93M | $101M | $8.22B | $1.50B | $7.33B |
DCBO vs SKIL vs SAP vs WDAY vs CRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docebo Inc. (DCBO) | 100 | 30.7 | -69.3% |
| Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 132.8 | +32.8% |
| Workday, Inc. (WDAY) | 100 | 51.2 | -48.8% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DCBO vs SKIL vs SAP vs WDAY vs CRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DCBO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 9.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.7%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs SKIL's -4.0%
- 13.0% ROA vs SKIL's -15.0%
Among these 5 stocks, SKIL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SAP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 1.5%
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.17x
- 19.1% margin vs SKIL's -26.0%
- 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CRM's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
WDAY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 10.7%, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 23.6x)
- Beta 0.71 vs SKIL's 1.69, lower leverage
CRM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 158.4% 10Y total return vs SAP's 152.2%
- PEG 1.26 vs SAP's 3.57
- -30.8% vs SKIL's -55.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs SKIL's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 23.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.1% margin vs SKIL's -26.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs SKIL's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CRM's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -30.8% vs SKIL's -55.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs SKIL's -15.0% |
DCBO vs SKIL vs SAP vs WDAY vs CRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DCBO vs SKIL vs SAP vs WDAY vs CRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SAP leads in 2 of 6 categories
SKIL leads 1 • DCBO leads 1 • WDAY leads 0 • CRM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SAP and WDAY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.5B annually — 175.9x DCBO's $236M. SAP is the more profitable business, keeping 19.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKIL's -26.0%. On growth, WDAY holds the edge at +14.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $236M | $516M | $36.8B | $9.6B | $41.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $15M | $11.2B | $1.2B | $11.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | -$134M | $7.0B | $693M | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $6M | $8.4B | $2.8B | $14.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.4% | +80.1% | +73.8% | +75.7% | +77.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | -15.8% | +26.7% | +8.9% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | -26.0% | +19.1% | +7.3% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +1.2% | +22.8% | +29.1% | +34.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.9% | -6.0% | +3.3% | +14.5% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.3% | -65.7% | +15.4% | +57.1% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SKIL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.6x trailing earnings, DCBO trades at a 53% valuation discount to WDAY's 50.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CRM offers better value at 1.96x vs SAP's 3.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $584M | $75M | $200.9B | $33.9B | $179.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $493M | $564M | $200.7B | $33.3B | $179.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.64x | -0.58x | 24.63x | 49.95x | 23.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.29x | — | 23.57x | 11.69x | 15.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.73x | — | 1.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.98x | 9.24x | 15.42x | 24.27x | 20.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.69x | 0.14x | 4.67x | 3.55x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.89x | 0.75x | 3.83x | 4.35x | 3.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.86x | 6.51x | 21.66x | 12.22x | 12.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DCBO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DCBO delivers a 49.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $-34 for SKIL. DCBO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIL's 6.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs SKIL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +49.7% | -33.7% | +15.7% | +8.9% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.0% | -15.0% | +9.7% | +3.8% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -8.1% | +16.0% | +8.5% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.5% | -8.8% | +18.2% | +8.5% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 6.28x | 0.18x | 0.11x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$91M | $488M | -$149M | -$667M | -$590M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $93M | $101M | $8.2B | $1.5B | $7.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $589M | $8.1B | $834M | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 119.61x | -1.69x | 8.49x | 12.60x | 44.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAP five years ago would be worth $13,505 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $431 for SKIL. Over the past 12 months, CRM leads with a -30.8% total return vs SKIL's -55.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAP at 10.5% vs SKIL's -28.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.4% | +1.4% | -26.3% | -37.4% | -26.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.9% | -55.0% | -41.5% | -48.1% | -30.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.8% | -63.8% | +34.8% | -29.0% | -3.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.3% | -95.7% | +35.0% | -45.4% | -11.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.3% | -95.6% | +152.2% | +80.2% | +158.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.5% | -28.7% | +10.5% | -10.8% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WDAY and CRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WDAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIL's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRM currently trades 63.2% from its 52-week high vs SKIL's 35.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.69x | 0.89x | 0.71x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.70 | $24.01 | $313.28 | $276.00 | $296.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.39 | $3.44 | $160.68 | $110.39 | $163.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +35.9% | +55.0% | +46.7% | +63.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 63.6 | 46.4 | 52.6 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 178K | 162K | 3.2M | 5.4M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SAP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DCBO as "Buy", SAP as "Buy", WDAY as "Buy", CRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.2% upside for SAP (target: $392) vs 53.3% for DCBO (target: $31). For income investors, SAP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.52% vs CRM's 0.89%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.17 | — | $391.67 | $197.90 | $287.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | — | 43 | 80 | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.5% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.24 | — | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.5% | +1.1% | +8.5% | +7.0% |
SAP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). SKIL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
DCBO vs SKIL vs SAP vs WDAY vs CRM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DCBO or SKIL or SAP or WDAY or CRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Docebo Inc.
(DCBO) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Docebo Inc. (DCBO) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Docebo Inc. (DCBO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DCBO or SKIL or SAP or WDAY or CRM?
On trailing P/E, Docebo Inc.
(DCBO) is the cheapest at 23. 6x versus Workday, Inc. at 50. 0x. On forward P/E, Workday, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Salesforce, Inc. wins at 1. 26x versus SAP SE's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DCBO or SKIL or SAP or WDAY or CRM?
Over the past 5 years, SAP SE (SAP) delivered a total return of +35.
0%, compared to -95. 7% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAP returned +152. 3% versus SKIL's -95. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DCBO or SKIL or SAP or WDAY or CRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Workday, Inc.
(WDAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Skillsoft Corp. 's 1. 69β — meaning SKIL is approximately 139% more volatile than WDAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Docebo Inc. (DCBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 6% for Skillsoft Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DCBO or SKIL or SAP or WDAY or CRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Docebo Inc.
(DCBO) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Docebo Inc. grew EPS 920. 2% year-over-year, compared to 22. 6% for Salesforce, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DCBO leads at 27. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DCBO or SKIL or SAP or WDAY or CRM?
SAP SE (SAP) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
1% net margin versus -23. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAP leads at 26. 7% versus -13. 1% for SKIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DCBO leads at 81. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DCBO or SKIL or SAP or WDAY or CRM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 26x versus SAP SE's 3. 57x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Workday, Inc. (WDAY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 23. 6x for SAP SE — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 127. 2% to $391. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — DCBO or SKIL or SAP or WDAY or CRM?
In this comparison, SAP (1.
5% yield), CRM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DCBO, SKIL, WDAY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DCBO or SKIL or SAP or WDAY or CRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 9% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRM: +149. 0%, SKIL: -95. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DCBO and SKIL and SAP and WDAY and CRM?
These companies operate in different sectors (DCBO (Technology) and SKIL (Consumer Defensive) and SAP (Technology) and WDAY (Technology) and CRM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DCBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; SKIL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAP is a large-cap quality compounder stock; WDAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SAP, CRM pay a dividend while DCBO, SKIL, WDAY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.