Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DIBS vs AMZN vs META vs SHOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
DIBS vs AMZN vs META vs SHOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $163M | $2.92T | $1.56T | $145.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $89M | $742.78B | $214.96B | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $90.80B | $70.59B | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 72.7% | 50.6% | 81.9% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | -26.4% | 11.5% | 41.2% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.8x | 20.4x | 60.9x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $152.99B | $83.90B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $86.81B | $35.87B | $1.53B |
DIBS vs AMZN vs META vs SHOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1stdibs.Com, Inc. (DIBS) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 157.6 | +57.6% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 177.4 | +77.4% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 76.5 | -23.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DIBS vs AMZN vs META vs SHOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DIBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.21
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 3.93x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 3.93x
- Beta 1.21 vs SHOP's 2.64
AMZN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
META carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.11 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 60.9x), PEG 1.11 vs 2.08
- 32.8% margin vs DIBS's -19.9%
- 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.1%, EPS growth -39.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs DIBS's 4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs DIBS's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 60.9x), PEG 1.11 vs 2.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.8% margin vs DIBS's -19.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.9% vs META's +3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.8% ROA vs DIBS's -13.2%, ROIC 27.6% vs -18.3% |
DIBS vs AMZN vs META vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DIBS vs AMZN vs META vs SHOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
META leads in 3 of 6 categories
DIBS leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 8306.4x DIBS's $89M. META is the more profitable business, keeping 32.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DIBS's -19.9%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $89M | $742.8B | $215.0B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $155.9B | $109.3B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $90.8B | $70.6B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$2.5B | $48.3B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.7% | +50.6% | +81.9% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | +11.5% | +41.2% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.9% | +12.2% | +32.8% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | -0.3% | +22.4% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | +16.6% | +33.1% | +34.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +74.8% | +62.4% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DIBS and META each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.3x trailing earnings, META trades at a 78% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $163M | $2.92T | $1.56T | $145.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $159M | $2.98T | $1.61T | $143.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.10x | 37.82x | 26.26x | 118.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x | 20.36x | 60.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | 1.43x | 4.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.47x | 15.81x | 95.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 4.07x | 7.78x | 12.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.70x | 7.14x | 7.31x | 10.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x | 33.90x | 72.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
META leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
META delivers a 33.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-19 for DIBS. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to META's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.0% | +23.3% | +33.2% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.2% | +11.5% | +20.8% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.3% | +14.7% | +27.6% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | +15.3% | +29.4% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.37x | 0.39x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $66.2B | $48.0B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $86.8B | $35.9B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $153.0B | $83.9B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 39.96x | 78.84x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
META leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in META five years ago would be worth $19,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,565 for DIBS. Over the past 12 months, DIBS leads with a +70.9% total return vs META's +3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors META at 38.6% vs DIBS's 2.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.4% | +19.7% | -5.1% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.9% | +43.7% | +3.7% | +18.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | +156.2% | +166.4% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | +64.8% | +94.8% | +0.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | +697.8% | +421.2% | +4123.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.7% | +36.8% | +38.6% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DIBS and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DIBS is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SHOP's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.51x | 1.59x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.62 | $278.56 | $796.25 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.35 | $185.01 | $520.26 | $88.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.3% | +97.3% | +77.5% | +61.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.6 | 81.1 | 42.8 | 34.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 178K | 45.5M | 15.6M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DIBS as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", META as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.0% upside for DIBS (target: $7) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). META is the only dividend payer here at 0.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $306.77 | $821.80 | $164.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 94 | 60 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.07 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +17.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
META leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
DIBS vs AMZN vs META vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DIBS or AMZN or META or SHOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for 1stdibs. Com, Inc. (DIBS). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 1stdibs. Com, Inc. (DIBS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DIBS or AMZN or META or SHOP?
On trailing P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the cheapest at 26. 3x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Meta Platforms, Inc. wins at 1. 11x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DIBS or AMZN or META or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) delivered a total return of +94. 8%, compared to -84. 4% for 1stdibs. Com, Inc. (DIBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus DIBS's -84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DIBS or AMZN or META or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 1stdibs.
Com, Inc. (DIBS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 118% more volatile than DIBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 39% for Meta Platforms, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DIBS or AMZN or META or SHOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus 4. 2% for 1stdibs. Com, Inc. (DIBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DIBS or AMZN or META or SHOP?
Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus -21. 1% for 1stdibs. Com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus -29. 7% for DIBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DIBS or AMZN or META or SHOP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 40. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIBS: 57. 0% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DIBS or AMZN or META or SHOP?
In this comparison, META (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. DIBS, AMZN, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DIBS or AMZN or META or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DIBS and AMZN and META and SHOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (DIBS (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and META (Communication Services) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DIBS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.