Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DOOO vs BC vs PII vs HOG vs FOXF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DOOO
BRP Inc.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$2.34B
5Y Perf.+85.5%
BC
Brunswick Corporation

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.26B
5Y Perf.+45.8%
PII
Polaris Inc.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.80B
5Y Perf.-26.9%
HOG
Harley-Davidson, Inc.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.64B
5Y Perf.-7.2%
FOXF
Fox Factory Holding Corp.

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$779M
5Y Perf.-74.5%

DOOO vs BC vs PII vs HOG vs FOXF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DOOO logoDOOO
BC logoBC
PII logoPII
HOG logoHOG
FOXF logoFOXF
IndustryAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Parts
Market Cap$2.34B$5.26B$3.80B$2.64B$779M
Revenue (TTM)$7.79B$5.52B$7.27B$4.32B$1.48B
Net Income (TTM)$-38M$-137M$-446M$230M$-300M
Gross Margin21.2%18.0%19.6%23.0%29.7%
Operating Margin5.5%5.2%-0.5%5.9%-18.0%
Forward P/E13.4x19.1x37.8x58.8x17.6x
Total Debt$3.13B$2.43B$1.54B$3.05B$780M
Cash & Equiv.$181M$275M$138M$3.09B$58M

DOOO vs BC vs PII vs HOG vs FOXFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DOOO
BC
PII
HOG
FOXF
StockMay 20Mar 26Return
BRP Inc. (DOOO)100185.5+85.5%
Brunswick Corporati… (BC)100145.8+45.8%
Polaris Inc. (PII)10073.1-26.9%
Harley-Davidson, In… (HOG)10092.8-7.2%
Fox Factory Holding… (FOXF)10025.5-74.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DOOO vs BC vs PII vs HOG vs FOXF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HOG leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Polaris Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. DOOO and FOXF also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DOOO
BRP Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

DOOO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 323.8% 10Y total return vs BC's 96.4%
  • Lower P/E (13.4x vs 17.6x)
Best for: long-term compounding
BC
Brunswick Corporation
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, BC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
PII
Polaris Inc.
The Income Pick

PII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 29 yrs, beta 1.56, yield 3.9%
  • 3.9% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs DOOO's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
  • +107.0% vs FOXF's -8.6%
Best for: income & stability
HOG
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

HOG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 96.7%, current ratio 2.10x
  • Beta 0.96, yield 3.0%, current ratio 2.10x
  • 5.3% margin vs FOXF's -20.2%
  • Beta 0.96 vs BC's 1.69, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
FOXF
Fox Factory Holding Corp.
The Growth Play

FOXF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -82.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.9%
  • 5.3% revenue growth vs DOOO's -24.5%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFOXF logoFOXF5.3% revenue growth vs DOOO's -24.5%
ValueDOOO logoDOOOLower P/E (13.4x vs 17.6x)
Quality / MarginsHOG logoHOG5.3% margin vs FOXF's -20.2%
Stability / SafetyHOG logoHOGBeta 0.96 vs BC's 1.69, lower leverage
DividendsPII logoPII3.9% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs DOOO's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PII logoPII+107.0% vs FOXF's -8.6%
Efficiency (ROA)HOG logoHOG2.4% ROA vs FOXF's -16.5%, ROIC 5.0% vs -24.2%

DOOO vs BC vs PII vs HOG vs FOXF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DOOOBRP Inc.
FY 2022
Year Round Products
48.1%$4.8B
Seasonal Products
34.3%$3.4B
Power sports PA A and OEM Engines member
12.7%$1.3B
Marine
4.9%$490M
BCBrunswick Corporation
FY 2025
Propulsion
35.6%$1.9B
Boat
28.4%$1.5B
Parts and Accessories
22.6%$1.2B
Navico Group
13.4%$721M
PIIPolaris Inc.
FY 2025
Wholegoods
73.8%$5.3B
PG&A
26.2%$1.9B
HOGHarley-Davidson, Inc.
FY 2025
Motorcycles
59.8%$2.7B
Financial Services
19.5%$869M
Parts & Accessories
13.8%$614M
Apparel
4.9%$216M
Product and Service, Other
1.6%$69M
License
0.5%$22M
FOXFFox Factory Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Specialty Sports Group
34.7%$509M
Powered Vehicles Group
33.3%$488M
Aftermarket Applications Group
32.0%$470M

DOOO vs BC vs PII vs HOG vs FOXF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHOGLAGGINGFOXF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — DOOO and HOG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

DOOO is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 5.3x FOXF's $1.5B. HOG is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOXF's -20.2%. On growth, BC holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDOOO logoDOOOBRP Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…PII logoPIIPolaris Inc.HOG logoHOGHarley-Davidson, …FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7.8B$5.5B$7.3B$4.3B$1.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$868M$511M$178M$366M-$196M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$38M-$137M-$446M$230M-$300M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$481M$341M$161M$44M$12M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.2%+18.0%+19.6%+23.0%+29.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.5%+5.2%-0.5%+5.9%-18.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.5%-2.5%-6.1%+5.3%-20.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.2%+6.2%+2.2%+1.0%+0.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.5%+12.8%+8.0%-11.8%+3.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.7%+6.7%+29.1%-79.4%+94.2%
Evenly matched — DOOO and HOG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HOG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, HOG's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BC's 29.3x.

MetricDOOO logoDOOOBRP Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…PII logoPIIPolaris Inc.HOG logoHOGHarley-Davidson, …FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
Market CapShares × price$2.3B$5.3B$3.8B$2.6B$779M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.5B$7.4B$5.2B$2.6B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-31.06x-38.82x-8.20x8.50x-1.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.45x19.05x37.77x58.76x17.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.04x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.33x29.31x20.20x5.29x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.42x0.98x0.53x0.59x0.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share26.77x3.26x4.54x0.91x1.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.37x13.27x6.81x6.37x28.89x
HOG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HOG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HOG delivers a 7.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-45 for PII. HOG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DOOO's 12.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOG scores 7/9 vs DOOO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricDOOO logoDOOOBRP Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…PII logoPIIPolaris Inc.HOG logoHOGHarley-Davidson, …FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-7.6%-5.1%-45.2%+7.0%-37.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.6%-2.5%-8.6%+2.4%-16.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.8%-0.8%-0.8%+5.0%-24.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.6%-1.0%-1.0%+5.6%-30.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934474
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage12.68x1.49x1.83x0.97x1.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.9B$2.2B$1.4B-$38M$722M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$181M$275M$138M$3.1B$58M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.1B$2.4B$1.5B$3.1B$780M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.82x4.34x-3.26x13.87x-5.17x
HOG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BC five years ago would be worth $7,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,158 for FOXF. Over the past 12 months, PII leads with a +107.0% total return vs FOXF's -8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BC at 1.2% vs FOXF's -42.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDOOO logoDOOOBRP Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…PII logoPIIPolaris Inc.HOG logoHOGHarley-Davidson, …FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.4%+7.0%+1.9%+15.4%+6.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+87.4%+79.7%+107.0%+6.0%-8.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.5%+3.8%-29.0%-27.8%-80.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.1%-23.5%-44.6%-45.8%-88.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+323.8%+96.4%+4.3%-28.0%+7.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.0%+1.2%-10.8%-10.3%-42.1%
BC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BC and HOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOG is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BC's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BC currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs FOXF's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDOOO logoDOOOBRP Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…PII logoPIIPolaris Inc.HOG logoHOGHarley-Davidson, …FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x1.72x1.59x0.99x1.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$81.89$90.23$75.25$31.25$31.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$33.22$45.52$33.23$17.09$13.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.4%+89.5%+89.1%+75.6%+59.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10029.457.662.257.157.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded198K886K1.3M3.5M658K
Evenly matched — BC and HOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: DOOO as "Buy", BC as "Buy", PII as "Hold", HOG as "Hold", FOXF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for DOOO (target: $103) vs -6.9% for HOG (target: $22). For income investors, PII offers the higher dividend yield at 3.94% vs DOOO's 0.94%.

MetricDOOO logoDOOOBRP Inc.BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…PII logoPIIPolaris Inc.HOG logoHOGHarley-Davidson, …FOXF logoFOXFFox Factory Holdi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$102.85$88.78$68.75$22.00$22.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1331273518
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+2.1%+3.9%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises4132951
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.84$1.71$2.64$0.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.6%+1.5%+0.1%+13.4%+0.2%
PII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HOG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallHarley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DOOO vs BC vs PII vs HOG vs FOXF: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DOOO or BC or PII or HOG or FOXF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Fox Factory Holding Corp.

(FOXF) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (58. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BRP Inc. (DOOO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DOOO or BC or PII or HOG or FOXF?

On forward P/E, BRP Inc.

is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DOOO or BC or PII or HOG or FOXF?

Over the past 5 years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) delivered a total return of -23.

5%, compared to -88. 4% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DOOO returned +323. 8% versus HOG's -24. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DOOO or BC or PII or HOG or FOXF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Harley-Davidson, Inc.

(HOG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Brunswick Corporation's 1. 72β — meaning BC is approximately 74% more volatile than HOG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 13% for BRP Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DOOO or BC or PII or HOG or FOXF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Factory Holding Corp.

(FOXF) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -24. 5% for BRP Inc. (DOOO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Harley-Davidson, Inc. grew EPS -19. 2% year-over-year, compared to -82. 5% for Fox Factory Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOOO leads at 0. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DOOO or BC or PII or HOG or FOXF?

Harley-Davidson, Inc.

(HOG) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -37. 1% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOG leads at 8. 6% versus -35. 6% for FOXF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOG leads at 30. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DOOO or BC or PII or HOG or FOXF more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, BRP Inc.

(DOOO) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 58. 8x for Harley-Davidson, Inc. — 45. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOOO: 60. 1% to $102. 85.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DOOO or BC or PII or HOG or FOXF?

In this comparison, PII (3.

9% yield), HOG (3. 0% yield), BC (2. 1% yield), DOOO (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FOXF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is DOOO or BC or PII or HOG or FOXF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, BRP Inc.

(DOOO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 14), 0. 9% yield, +323. 8% 10Y return). Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOOO: +323. 8%, FOXF: +2. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DOOO and BC and PII and HOG and FOXF?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DOOO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PII is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FOXF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DOOO, BC, PII, HOG pay a dividend while FOXF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

DOOO

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PII

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOXF

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DOOO and BC and PII and HOG and FOXF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DOOO: 2.5% · BC: 12.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.