Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EGHT vs BAND vs MGNI vs LPSN vs FIVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
EGHT vs BAND vs MGNI vs LPSN vs FIVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $372M | $1.56B | $2.01B | $32M | $1.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $728M | $209.36B | $723M | $244M | $1.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $4.11B | $159M | $-67M | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 65.7% | 37.3% | 63.4% | 62.2% | 55.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | -2.2% | 14.8% | -9.6% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 27.4x | 13.4x | — | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $410M | $701M | $279M | $392M | $847M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $88M | $103M | $553M | $95M | $232M |
EGHT vs BAND vs MGNI vs LPSN vs FIVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8x8, Inc. (EGHT) | 100 | 18.4 | -81.6% |
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Five9, Inc. (FIVN) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EGHT vs BAND vs MGNI vs LPSN vs FIVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EGHT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.49
- Beta 1.49, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 1.49 vs LPSN's 2.05
BAND is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 143.3% 10Y total return vs MGNI's -4.7%
- +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1%
MGNI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 22.0% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
- 5.3% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 9.5% vs -6.6%
Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, current ratio 4.09x
- 10.3% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs LPSN's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 9.5% vs -6.6% |
EGHT vs BAND vs MGNI vs LPSN vs FIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EGHT vs BAND vs MGNI vs LPSN vs FIVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MGNI leads in 1 of 6 categories
BAND leads 1 • EGHT leads 0 • LPSN leads 0 • FIVN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MGNI and FIVN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 859.0x LPSN's $244M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $728M | $209.4B | $723M | $244M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | -$4.6B | $145M | -$562,000 | $140M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $4.1B | $159M | -$67M | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $62M | $1.8B | $44M | -$43M | $206M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.7% | +37.3% | +63.4% | +62.2% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -2.2% | +14.8% | -9.6% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +2.0% | +22.0% | -27.6% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +0.8% | +6.1% | -17.4% | +17.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.0% | +1197.2% | +5.5% | -19.0% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.6% | +39.8% | +142.9% | +79.4% | +20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BAND and MGNI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 69% valuation discount to FIVN's 48.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAND's 50.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $372M | $1.6B | $2.0B | $32M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $694M | $2.2B | $1.7B | $329M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.71x | -113.15x | 14.74x | -0.22x | 48.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.27x | 27.36x | 13.45x | — | 6.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.76x | 50.39x | 11.43x | — | 16.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 2.07x | 2.81x | 0.13x | 1.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.84x | 3.65x | 2.33x | — | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.43x | 0.02x | 12.11x | — | 8.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-3 for EGHT. MGNI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EGHT's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +4.0% | +18.6% | — | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +1.7% | +5.3% | -12.4% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | -1.2% | +9.5% | -6.6% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | -1.6% | +7.3% | -5.8% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.36x | 1.75x | 0.30x | — | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $322M | $598M | -$275M | $297M | $615M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $88M | $103M | $553M | $95M | $232M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $410M | $701M | $279M | $392M | $847M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | -10.30x | 4.03x | 0.20x | 7.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGNI five years ago would be worth $3,906 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 62.7% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.3% | +242.2% | -12.8% | -31.1% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +51.7% | +253.6% | +12.6% | -77.1% | -11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.2% | +330.6% | +58.7% | -95.8% | -61.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.8% | -61.3% | -60.9% | -99.7% | -87.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | +143.3% | -4.7% | -97.0% | +125.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.8% | +62.7% | +16.7% | -65.4% | -27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EGHT and BAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGHT is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.86x | 1.63x | 2.05x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.88 | $49.25 | $26.65 | $21.60 | $30.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.56 | $12.57 | $10.82 | $2.37 | $13.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.7% | +98.8% | +52.5% | +12.4% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 90.4 | 55.4 | 40.3 | 68.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 670K | 2.1M | 148K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EGHT as "Hold", BAND as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 640.4% upside for EGHT (target: $20) vs -5.5% for BAND (target: $46).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.77 | $46.00 | $18.00 | — | $28.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 15 | 31 | — | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.3% | 0.0% | +2.9% |
MGNI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). BAND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
EGHT vs BAND vs MGNI vs LPSN vs FIVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EGHT or BAND or MGNI or LPSN or FIVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) is the stronger pick with 10. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EGHT or BAND or MGNI or LPSN or FIVN?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Five9, Inc. at 48. 3x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EGHT or BAND or MGNI or LPSN or FIVN?
Over the past 5 years, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) delivered a total return of -60. 9%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAND returned +143. 3% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EGHT or BAND or MGNI or LPSN or FIVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 8x8, Inc.
(EGHT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 49β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 37% more volatile than EGHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 3% for 8x8, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EGHT or BAND or MGNI or LPSN or FIVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) is pulling ahead at 10. 3% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EGHT or BAND or MGNI or LPSN or FIVN?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGNI leads at 13. 7% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EGHT leads at 67. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EGHT or BAND or MGNI or LPSN or FIVN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for Bandwidth Inc. — 20. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EGHT: 640. 4% to $19. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — EGHT or BAND or MGNI or LPSN or FIVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is EGHT or BAND or MGNI or LPSN or FIVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 8x8, Inc.
(EGHT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGHT: -77. 0%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EGHT and BAND and MGNI and LPSN and FIVN?
These companies operate in different sectors (EGHT (Technology) and BAND (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services) and LPSN (Technology) and FIVN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EGHT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.