Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EIG vs KNTK vs AMSF vs HCI vs ACGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Insurance - Specialty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Diversified
EIG vs KNTK vs AMSF vs HCI vs ACGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Oil & Gas Midstream | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $975M | $4.92B | $559M | $1.99B | $33.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $863M | $1.76B | $325M | $902M | $19.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $526M | $46M | $309M | $4.40B |
| Gross Margin | 34.3% | 26.2% | 47.6% | 41.7% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 9.3% | 17.8% | 31.6% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 42.2x | 14.1x | 9.3x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $3.98B | $491K | $32M | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $160M | $4M | $62M | $1.21B | $993M |
EIG vs KNTK vs AMSF vs HCI vs ACGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employers Holdings,… (EIG) | 100 | 138.4 | +38.4% |
| Kinetik Holdings In… (KNTK) | 100 | 698.8 | +598.8% |
| AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 343.7 | +243.7% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 335.6 | +235.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EIG vs KNTK vs AMSF vs HCI vs ACGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, EIG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KNTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +33.7% vs AMSF's -30.6%
- 133.1% ROA vs EIG's 0.2%, ROIC 1.8% vs 1.0%
AMSF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.23, yield 8.6%
- 8.6% yield, vs KNTK's 6.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 452.3% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 320.6%
- PEG 0.19 vs ACGL's 0.35
- 20.2% revenue growth vs EIG's -2.6%
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02 vs KNTK's 0.60, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs EIG's -2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs EIG's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs KNTK's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.6% yield, vs KNTK's 6.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.7% vs AMSF's -30.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 133.1% ROA vs EIG's 0.2%, ROIC 1.8% vs 1.0% |
EIG vs KNTK vs AMSF vs HCI vs ACGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EIG vs KNTK vs AMSF vs HCI vs ACGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
AMSF leads 1 • EIG leads 0 • KNTK leads 0 • ACGL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 61.4x AMSF's $325M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EIG's 0.9%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +52.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $863M | $1.8B | $325M | $902M | $19.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $548M | $58M | $294M | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $526M | $46M | $309M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $351M | $8M | $444M | $6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +26.2% | +47.6% | +41.7% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +9.3% | +17.8% | +31.6% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +29.8% | +14.3% | +34.3% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +19.9% | +2.5% | +49.3% | +30.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +11.6% | +10.3% | +52.5% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.2% | — | -8.5% | +40.9% | +39.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.2x trailing earnings, HCI trades at a 93% valuation discount to EIG's 92.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCI offers better value at 0.13x vs ACGL's 0.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $975M | $4.9B | $559M | $2.0B | $33.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $855M | $8.9B | $497M | $816M | $35.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 92.69x | — | 12.04x | 6.22x | 8.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.24x | 42.23x | 14.09x | 9.27x | 10.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.13x | 0.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 68.36x | 16.26x | 8.35x | — | 6.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.14x | 2.79x | 1.76x | 2.21x | 1.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.08x | 2.25x | 1.91x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.95x | 8.15x | 62.63x | 4.49x | 5.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMSF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $1 for EIG. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KNTK's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMSF scores 7/9 vs KNTK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +17.8% | +9.7% | +29.6% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +133.1% | +5.6% | +12.2% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +1.8% | +21.9% | — | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +2.5% | +16.8% | — | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.36x | 0.00x | 0.03x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$121M | $4.0B | -$61M | -$1.2B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $160M | $4M | $62M | $1.2B | $993M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $4.0B | $491,000 | $32M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.20x | 2.63x | — | 32.05x | 34.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,055 for AMSF. Over the past 12 months, KNTK leads with a +33.7% total return vs AMSF's -30.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 47.5% vs AMSF's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.9% | +42.8% | -19.8% | -15.6% | +0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.7% | +33.7% | -30.6% | +5.2% | +1.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.7% | +103.3% | -26.2% | +221.0% | +32.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.7% | +94.5% | -19.4% | +111.5% | +146.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.8% | -31.5% | +34.7% | +452.3% | +320.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | +26.7% | -9.6% | +47.5% | +9.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KNTK and ACGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KNTK's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KNTK currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs AMSF's 61.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.60x | 0.23x | 0.39x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.37 | $51.11 | $48.54 | $210.50 | $103.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.73 | $31.33 | $29.60 | $136.37 | $82.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.8% | +98.7% | +61.2% | +73.5% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 65.7 | 36.2 | 39.6 | 42.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 235K | 1.2M | 210K | 163K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KNTK and AMSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EIG as "Buy", KNTK as "Buy", AMSF as "Buy", HCI as "Buy", ACGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.7% upside for AMSF (target: $45) vs -18.3% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, AMSF offers the higher dividend yield at 8.57% vs EIG's 2.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $47.57 | $44.50 | $126.50 | $104.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 15 | 6 | 14 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +6.1% | +8.6% | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $3.09 | $2.55 | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +18.7% | 0.0% | +2.2% | 0.0% | +5.6% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMSF leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
EIG vs KNTK vs AMSF vs HCI vs ACGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EIG or KNTK or AMSF or HCI or ACGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG). HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) offers the better valuation at 6. 2x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EIG or KNTK or AMSF or HCI or ACGL?
On trailing P/E, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the cheapest at 6. 2x versus Employers Holdings, Inc. at 92. 7x. On forward P/E, HCI Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EIG or KNTK or AMSF or HCI or ACGL?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +146. 7%, compared to -19. 4% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +451. 6% versus KNTK's -33. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EIG or KNTK or AMSF or HCI or ACGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Kinetik Holdings Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning KNTK is approximately 3790% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 136% for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EIG or KNTK or AMSF or HCI or ACGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus -2. 6% for Employers Holdings, Inc. (EIG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Kinetik Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACGL leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EIG or KNTK or AMSF or HCI or ACGL?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 6% net margin versus 1. 3% for Employers Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 35. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 31. 6% versus 1. 4% for EIG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMSF leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EIG or KNTK or AMSF or HCI or ACGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 42. 2x for Kinetik Holdings Inc. — 33. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMSF: 49. 7% to $44. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — EIG or KNTK or AMSF or HCI or ACGL?
In this comparison, AMSF (8.
6% yield), KNTK (6. 1% yield), EIG (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. HCI, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EIG or KNTK or AMSF or HCI or ACGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.
(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +33. 4%, KNTK: -33. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EIG and KNTK and AMSF and HCI and ACGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (EIG (Financial Services) and KNTK (Energy) and AMSF (Financial Services) and HCI (Financial Services) and ACGL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EIG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KNTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EIG, KNTK, AMSF pay a dividend while HCI, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.