Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ELSE vs PESI vs FLUX vs CWST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Waste Management
ELSE vs PESI vs FLUX vs CWST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Waste Management | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $27M | $204M | $18M | $5.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $59M | $51M | $1.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $404K | $-18M | $-6M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | 50.7% | 4.1% | 32.1% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | -26.3% | -1.9% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 58.7x | — | — | 62.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $4M | $16M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $12M | $1M | $124M |
ELSE vs PESI vs FLUX vs CWST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electro-Sensors, In… (ELSE) | 100 | 210.8 | +110.8% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
| Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX) | 100 | 16.8 | -83.2% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 152.2 | +52.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELSE vs PESI vs FLUX vs CWST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 62.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, current ratio 24.41x
- Beta 0.02, current ratio 24.41x
- Better valuation composite
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.74
FLUX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs PESI's 174.4%
- 18.0% revenue growth vs PESI's 4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs PESI's 4.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs FLUX's 2.23 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.7% vs FLUX's -48.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs FLUX's -21.0%, ROIC -0.1% vs -30.1% |
ELSE vs PESI vs FLUX vs CWST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ELSE vs PESI vs FLUX vs CWST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ELSE leads in 3 of 6 categories
CWST leads 1 • PESI leads 0 • FLUX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ELSE and CWST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 191.8x ELSE's $10M. ELSE is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, CWST holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $59M | $51M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $130,000 | -$14M | -$212,000 | $414M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $404,000 | -$18M | -$6M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $325,000 | -$13M | -$7M | $102M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.7% | +4.1% | +32.1% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -26.3% | -1.9% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | -30.1% | -12.5% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | -22.0% | -14.7% | +5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | -20.1% | -60.6% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.4% | -110.5% | -25.0% | -18.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CWST leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 58.7x trailing earnings, ELSE trades at a 92% valuation discount to CWST's 712.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CWST's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ELSE's 188.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $204M | $18M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $197M | $32M | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.69x | -14.67x | -2.52x | 712.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 62.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.13x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 188.73x | — | — | 15.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.83x | 3.31x | 0.27x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 4.05x | — | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 340.47x | — | — | 63.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ELSE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ELSE delivers a 2.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-7 for FLUX. PESI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWST's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLUX scores 6/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | -34.5% | -7.4% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | -20.2% | -21.0% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -21.7% | -30.1% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -16.7% | — | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.09x | — | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$7M | $15M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $12M | $1M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4M | $16M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 66.50x | -42.14x | -1.19x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELSE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELSE five years ago would be worth $17,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,158 for FLUX. Over the past 12 months, ELSE leads with a +93.7% total return vs FLUX's -48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELSE at 19.2% vs FLUX's -35.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +81.7% | -10.2% | -28.9% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +93.7% | +15.8% | -48.7% | -27.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.6% | +19.8% | -73.7% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.6% | +46.7% | -88.4% | +26.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.7% | +174.4% | -76.0% | +1059.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.2% | +6.2% | -35.9% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ELSE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLUX's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ELSE currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs FLUX's 13.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 1.74x | 2.23x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.66 | $16.50 | $7.55 | $121.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.65 | $8.02 | $0.91 | $74.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +66.7% | +13.4% | +70.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 87.0 | 35.7 | 54.8 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 164K | 127K | 849K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.6% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 31.5% for CWST (target: $112).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | — | $112.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ELSE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CWST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ELSE vs PESI vs FLUX vs CWST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELSE or PESI or FLUX or CWST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). Electro-Sensors, Inc. (ELSE) offers the better valuation at 58. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELSE or PESI or FLUX or CWST?
On trailing P/E, Electro-Sensors, Inc.
(ELSE) is the cheapest at 58. 7x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELSE or PESI or FLUX or CWST?
Over the past 5 years, Electro-Sensors, Inc.
(ELSE) delivered a total return of +72. 6%, compared to -88. 4% for Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus FLUX's -76. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELSE or PESI or FLUX or CWST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electro-Sensors, Inc.
(ELSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Flux Power Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning FLUX is approximately 8911% more volatile than ELSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 79% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELSE or PESI or FLUX or CWST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Electro-Sensors, Inc. grew EPS 62. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 8% for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELSE or PESI or FLUX or CWST?
Electro-Sensors, Inc.
(ELSE) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 8% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWST leads at 4. 9% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ELSE leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELSE or PESI or FLUX or CWST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 63.
6% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELSE or PESI or FLUX or CWST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ELSE or PESI or FLUX or CWST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), +1059% 10Y return). Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, FLUX: -76. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELSE and PESI and FLUX and CWST?
These companies operate in different sectors (ELSE (Technology) and PESI (Industrials) and FLUX (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ELSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.