Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ENTA vs PRTA vs FOLD vs ARQT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ENTA
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$438M
5Y Perf.-70.7%
PRTA
Prothena Corporation plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$567M
5Y Perf.-1.2%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+15.9%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.58B
5Y Perf.-38.4%

ENTA vs PRTA vs FOLD vs ARQT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ENTA logoENTA
PRTA logoPRTA
FOLD logoFOLD
ARQT logoARQT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$438M$567M$4.55B$2.58B
Revenue (TTM)$67M$58M$634M$416M
Net Income (TTM)$-72M$-151M$-27M$-2M
Gross Margin72.2%-39.7%87.9%90.9%
Operating Margin-109.1%-210.6%5.2%0.8%
Forward P/E42.7x40.6x77.6x
Total Debt$201M$14M$483M$6M
Cash & Equiv.$32M$308M$214M$43M

ENTA vs PRTA vs FOLD vs ARQTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ENTA
PRTA
FOLD
ARQT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Enanta Pharmaceutic… (ENTA)10029.3-70.7%
Prothena Corporatio… (PRTA)10098.8-1.2%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100115.9+15.9%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)10061.6-38.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ENTA vs PRTA vs FOLD vs ARQT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ARQT leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. ENTA also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ENTA
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

ENTA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +198.2% vs PRTA's +44.4%
Best for: momentum
PRTA
Prothena Corporation plc
The Defensive Pick

PRTA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 7.72x
  • Beta 0.96, current ratio 7.72x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • beta 0.63
  • 119.2% 10Y total return vs ARQT's -5.2%
  • Lower P/E (40.6x vs 77.6x)
  • Beta 0.63 vs ARQT's 1.48
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
  • 91.3% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8%
  • -0.6% margin vs PRTA's -260.9%
  • -0.6% ROA vs PRTA's -42.3%, ROIC -5.2% vs -21.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARQT logoARQT91.3% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8%
ValueFOLD logoFOLDLower P/E (40.6x vs 77.6x)
Quality / MarginsARQT logoARQT-0.6% margin vs PRTA's -260.9%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.63 vs ARQT's 1.48
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ENTA logoENTA+198.2% vs PRTA's +44.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ARQT logoARQT-0.6% ROA vs PRTA's -42.3%, ROIC -5.2% vs -21.0%

ENTA vs PRTA vs FOLD vs ARQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ENTAEnanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
100.0%$65M
PRTAProthena Corporation plc
FY 2025
Collaboration
99.5%$10M
License
0.5%$50,000
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M

ENTA vs PRTA vs FOLD vs ARQT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFOLDLAGGINGPRTA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ARQT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $634M annually — 10.9x PRTA's $58M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.6% (ARQT) to -2.6% (PRTA). On growth, PRTA holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricENTA logoENTAEnanta Pharmaceut…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$67M$58M$634M$416M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$69M-$121M$40M$6M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$72M-$151M-$27M-$2M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M-$85M$30M$27M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.2%-39.7%+87.9%+90.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-109.1%-2.1%+5.2%+0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-106.8%-2.6%-4.3%-0.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-27.6%-147.2%+4.7%+6.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.8%+17.1%+23.7%+60.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.0%+153.6%-89.0%+55.0%
ARQT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricENTA logoENTAEnanta Pharmaceut…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…
Market CapShares × price$438M$567M$4.5B$2.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$607M$273M$4.8B$2.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.93x-2.32x-164.85x-158.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.42.68x40.62x77.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple114.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.70x58.54x7.17x6.87x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.97x2.02x16.29x13.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF152.43x
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ARQT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-57 for ENTA. ARQT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENTA's 3.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOLD scores 4/9 vs PRTA's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricENTA logoENTAEnanta Pharmaceut…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-56.5%-49.9%-12.0%-1.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.7%-42.3%-3.2%-0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-23.2%-21.0%+5.3%-5.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-31.0%-47.0%+5.1%-4.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93144
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.11x0.05x1.76x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$169M-$294M$269M-$37M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$308M$214M$43M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$201M$14M$483M$6M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-7.27x1.00x2.08x
ARQT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — FOLD and ARQT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $14,862 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,111 for ENTA. Over the past 12 months, ENTA leads with a +198.2% total return vs PRTA's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARQT at 13.2% vs PRTA's -48.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricENTA logoENTAEnanta Pharmaceut…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.6%+14.5%+1.5%-28.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+198.2%+44.4%+137.9%+50.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.0%-86.3%+19.0%+44.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.9%-57.2%+48.6%-39.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-40.7%-73.0%+119.2%-5.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-24.0%-48.5%+6.0%+13.2%
Evenly matched — FOLD and ARQT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARQT's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ARQT's 65.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricENTA logoENTAEnanta Pharmaceut…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.44x0.96x0.63x1.48x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.15$11.69$14.50$31.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.96$4.32$5.51$12.42
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.0%+90.1%+99.9%+65.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.160.372.254.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded143K474K3.0M1.3M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ENTA as "Buy", PRTA as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 219.4% upside for ENTA (target: $48) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricENTA logoENTAEnanta Pharmaceut…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$48.20$19.00$14.50$35.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts19282412
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ARQT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOLD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallAmicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ENTA vs PRTA vs FOLD vs ARQT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ENTA or PRTA or FOLD or ARQT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). Analysts rate Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ENTA or PRTA or FOLD or ARQT?

Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) delivered a total return of +48. 6%, compared to -68. 9% for Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +119. 2% versus PRTA's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ENTA or PRTA or FOLD or ARQT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ARQT is approximately 134% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ENTA or PRTA or FOLD or ARQT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for Prothena Corporation plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ENTA or PRTA or FOLD or ARQT?

Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 3% net margin versus -25. 2% for Prothena Corporation plc — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOLD leads at 5. 4% versus -1905. 8% for PRTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENTA leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ENTA or PRTA or FOLD or ARQT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) trades at 40. 6x forward P/E versus 77. 6x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 37. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENTA: 219. 4% to $48. 20.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ENTA or PRTA or FOLD or ARQT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is ENTA or PRTA or FOLD or ARQT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, ARQT: -5. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ENTA and PRTA and FOLD and ARQT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ENTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ENTA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 43%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRTA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 853%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARQT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ENTA and PRTA and FOLD and ARQT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ENTA: 9.8% · PRTA: 1706.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.