Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
EPWK vs RELY vs PYPL vs WU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
EPWK vs RELY vs PYPL vs WU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $502K | $4.80B | $40.77B | $2.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $1.73B | $33.17B | $4.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $106M | $5.06B | $441M |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 43.6% | 46.6% | 28.7% |
| Operating Margin | -8.8% | 6.9% | 18.3% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.1x | 8.7x | 5.1x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $220M | $9.99B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $228K | $542M | $8.05B | $1.23B |
EPWK vs RELY vs PYPL vs WU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 65.0 | -35.0% |
| The Western Union C… (WU) | 100 | 88.9 | -11.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPWK vs RELY vs PYPL vs WU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EPWK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RELY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 3.30x
- 29.4% revenue growth vs WU's -4.0%
- +8.1% vs EPWK's -99.7%
PYPL is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 15.8% margin vs EPWK's -5.8%
WU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.4%
- -7.6% 10Y total return vs PYPL's 17.4%
- Beta 0.63, yield 10.4%, current ratio 16.52x
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 44.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs WU's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 44.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs EPWK's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs EPWK's 2.00 | |
| Dividends | 10.4% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs PYPL's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.1% vs EPWK's -99.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs EPWK's -45.7% |
EPWK vs RELY vs PYPL vs WU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EPWK vs RELY vs PYPL vs WU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WU leads in 3 of 6 categories
PYPL leads 1 • RELY leads 1 • EPWK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PYPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PYPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.2B annually — 892.4x EPWK's $37M. PYPL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPWK's -5.8%. On growth, RELY holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $1.7B | $33.2B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $149M | $6.7B | $838M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $106M | $5.1B | $441M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $256M | $5.5B | $331M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +43.6% | +46.6% | +28.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +6.9% | +18.3% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +6.1% | +15.8% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +14.8% | +16.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.5% | +25.2% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.3% | +3.6% | -6.2% | -44.4% |
Valuation Metrics
WU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, WU trades at a 92% valuation discount to RELY's 73.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WU's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RELY's 42.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $501,713 | $4.8B | $40.8B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $4.5B | $42.7B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.30x | 73.52x | 8.54x | 5.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.06x | 8.71x | 5.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.97x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 41.98x | 6.08x | 1.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 2.94x | 1.23x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.71x | 2.21x | 3.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.24x | 7.33x | 7.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WU leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WU delivers a 47.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $13 for RELY. RELY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PYPL's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs EPWK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +12.7% | +25.1% | +47.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.7% | +8.1% | +6.3% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +14.2% | +15.0% | +23.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.4% | +18.1% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | 0.49x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$322M | $1.9B | -$1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227,826 | $542M | $8.0B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $220M | $10.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.50x | 16.25x | 19.28x | 2.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RELY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WU five years ago would be worth $5,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38 for EPWK. Over the past 12 months, RELY leads with a +8.1% total return vs EPWK's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RELY at 7.8% vs EPWK's -84.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6750.0% | +72.4% | -20.3% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.7% | +8.1% | -32.3% | +4.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +25.4% | -38.4% | -3.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -53.0% | -81.6% | -45.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -53.0% | +17.4% | -7.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.4% | +7.8% | -14.9% | -1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RELY and WU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WU is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EPWK's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RELY currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs EPWK's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.00x | 1.19x | 1.39x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $510.40 | $24.71 | $79.50 | $10.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $12.08 | $38.46 | $7.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +92.2% | +58.1% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 85.3 | 40.9 | 45.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 161K | 3.4M | 15.4M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
WU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RELY as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold", WU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.8% upside for PYPL (target: $52) vs -7.9% for RELY (target: $21). For income investors, WU offers the higher dividend yield at 10.45% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 | $51.67 | $9.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 70 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | +10.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +14.8% | +8.3% |
WU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PYPL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
EPWK vs RELY vs PYPL vs WU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPWK or RELY or PYPL or WU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for The Western Union Company (WU). The Western Union Company (WU) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EPWK or RELY or PYPL or WU?
On trailing P/E, The Western Union Company (WU) is the cheapest at 5.
9x versus Remitly Global, Inc. at 73. 5x. On forward P/E, The Western Union Company is actually cheaper at 5. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EPWK or RELY or PYPL or WU?
Over the past 5 years, The Western Union Company (WU) delivered a total return of -45.
3%, compared to -99. 6% for EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PYPL returned +17. 4% versus EPWK's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EPWK or RELY or PYPL or WU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Western Union Company (WU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus EPWK Holdings Ltd. 's 2. 00β — meaning EPWK is approximately 219% more volatile than WU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 49% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EPWK or RELY or PYPL or WU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus -4. 0% for The Western Union Company (WU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Remitly Global, Inc. grew EPS 263. 2% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for The Western Union Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELY leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EPWK or RELY or PYPL or WU?
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 8% net margin versus -6. 0% for EPWK Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WU leads at 19. 4% versus -8. 4% for EPWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RELY leads at 57. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EPWK or RELY or PYPL or WU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Western Union Company (WU) trades at 5.
1x forward P/E versus 44. 1x for Remitly Global, Inc. — 38. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PYPL: 11. 8% to $51. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — EPWK or RELY or PYPL or WU?
In this comparison, WU (10.
4% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. EPWK, RELY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EPWK or RELY or PYPL or WU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Western Union Company (WU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 10. 4% yield). EPWK Holdings Ltd. (EPWK) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WU: -7. 6%, EPWK: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EPWK and RELY and PYPL and WU?
These companies operate in different sectors (EPWK (Industrials) and RELY (Technology) and PYPL (Financial Services) and WU (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EPWK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WU is a small-cap deep-value stock. WU pays a dividend while EPWK, RELY, PYPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.