Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ETD vs RH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
ETD vs RH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $519M | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $593M | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $40M | $110M |
| Gross Margin | 60.4% | 44.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $124M | $3.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $30M |
ETD vs RH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethan Allen Interio… (ETD) | 100 | 180.6 | +80.6% |
| Rh (RH) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETD vs RH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ETD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 9.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 1.11, yield 9.6%, current ratio 2.03x
RH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth -38.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.4%
- 257.5% 10Y total return vs ETD's 7.3%
- 5.0% revenue growth vs ETD's -4.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs ETD's -4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs RH's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs RH's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | 9.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -12.1% vs RH's -29.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.5% ROA vs RH's 2.3%, ROIC 8.7% vs 6.9% |
ETD vs RH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ETD vs RH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ETD and RH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RH is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 5.7x ETD's $593M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.8% (ETD) to 3.2% (RH). On growth, RH holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $593M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $61M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $40M | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $128M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.4% | +44.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.8% | +10.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ETD leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, ETD trades at a 73% valuation discount to RH's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ETD's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RH's 14.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $519M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $568M | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.15x | 36.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.22x | 19.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.32x | 14.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.84x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.30x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ETD leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RH delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $8 for ETD.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.5% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $124M | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 199.47x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ETD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETD five years ago would be worth $9,450 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,908 for RH. Over the past 12 months, ETD leads with a -12.1% total return vs RH's -29.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ETD at -1.2% vs RH's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | -30.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.1% | -29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.7% | -48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.5% | -80.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.3% | +257.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.2% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ETD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ETD is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RH's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETD currently trades 65.0% from its 52-week high vs RH's 52.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.41 | $257.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.01 | $106.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +52.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.7 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 370K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ETD as "Hold" and RH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.5% upside for RH (target: $208) vs 17.6% for ETD (target: $24). ETD is the only dividend payer here at 9.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $208.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.95 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
ETD leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
ETD vs RH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETD or RH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rh (RH) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rh (RH) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETD or RH?
On trailing P/E, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Rh at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETD or RH?
Over the past 5 years, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) delivered a total return of -5. 5%, compared to -80. 9% for Rh (RH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RH returned +257. 5% versus ETD's +7. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETD or RH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Rh's 2. 36β — meaning RH is approximately 112% more volatile than ETD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — ETD or RH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rh (RH) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus -4. 9% for Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (ETD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. grew EPS -19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -38. 7% for Rh. Over a 3-year CAGR, RH leads at -5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETD or RH?
Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 2. 3% for Rh — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RH leads at 10. 1% versus 10. 1% for ETD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETD leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETD or RH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Rh — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RH: 55. 5% to $208. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETD or RH?
In this comparison, ETD (9.
6% yield) pays a dividend. RH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ETD or RH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
(ETD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 9. 6% yield). Rh (RH) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETD: +7. 3%, RH: +257. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETD and RH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ETD is a small-cap deep-value stock; RH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ETD pays a dividend while RH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.