Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$839M
5Y Perf.+325.5%
MNPR
Monopar Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$416M
5Y Perf.+181.2%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.63B
5Y Perf.-36.5%
CLDX
Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

NASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.22B
5Y Perf.+110.4%
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$30.32B
5Y Perf.+16.0%

ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ETON logoETON
MNPR logoMNPR
PRAX logoPRAX
CLDX logoCLDX
IQV logoIQV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$839M$416M$9.63B$2.22B$30.32B
Revenue (TTM)$80M$0.00$-92K$2M$16.63B
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$-19M$-327M$-259M$1.39B
Gross Margin53.5%100.0%26.1%
Operating Margin-1.1%-191.6%13.9%
Forward P/E37.4x14.1x
Total Debt$9M$0.00$110K$2M$16.17B
Cash & Equiv.$26M$46M$357M$29M$1.98B

ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ETON
MNPR
PRAX
CLDX
IQV
StockOct 20May 26Return
Eton Pharmaceutical… (ETON)100425.5+325.5%
Monopar Therapeutic… (MNPR)100281.2+181.2%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10063.5-36.5%
Celldex Therapeutic… (CLDX)100210.4+110.4%
IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)100116.0+16.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IQV leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. MNPR and PRAX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

ETON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 104.9%, EPS growth -13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 55.5%
  • 396.3% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 1.57x
  • Beta 0.66 vs CLDX's 1.73
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MNPR
Monopar Therapeutics Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MNPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 1.46, current ratio 11.47x
  • 1.9K% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: defensive
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +7.7% vs IQV's +16.5%
Best for: momentum
CLDX
Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.
The Secondary Option

Among these 5 stocks, CLDX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: portfolio exposure
IQV
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
  • Better valuation composite
  • 8.3% margin vs CLDX's -172.5%
  • 4.7% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs -65.0%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMNPR logoMNPR1.9K% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueIQV logoIQVBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsIQV logoIQV8.3% margin vs CLDX's -172.5%
Stability / SafetyETON logoETONBeta 0.66 vs CLDX's 1.73
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs IQV's +16.5%
Efficiency (ROA)IQV logoIQV4.7% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs -65.0%

ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ETONEton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Sales and Royalties
95.9%$77M
License
4.1%$3M
MNPRMonopar Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
CLDXCelldex Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Grant
93.7%$1M
Service
6.3%$97,000
IQVIQVIA Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Research And Development Solutions
54.5%$8.9B
Technology And Analytics Solutions
40.6%$6.6B
Contract Sales And Medical Solutions
4.8%$788M

ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIQVLAGGINGCLDX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLDX's -172.5%. On growth, ETON holds the edge at +82.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricETON logoETONEton Pharmaceutic…MNPR logoMNPRMonopar Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$80M$0-$92,000$2M$16.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M-$20M-$357M-$284M$3.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M-$19M-$327M-$259M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$333,000-$11M-$283M-$213M$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.5%+100.0%+26.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.1%-191.6%+13.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.8%-172.5%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.4%-142.2%+16.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+82.7%-93.6%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.4%-3.4%+2.7%-73.2%+15.0%
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricETON logoETONEton Pharmaceutic…MNPR logoMNPRMonopar Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Market CapShares × price$839M$416M$9.6B$2.2B$30.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$822M$370M$9.3B$2.2B$44.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-182.47x-45.90x-24.72x-8.54x22.79x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.37.37x14.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.56x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.97x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue10.49x1477.19x1.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share31.91x13.03x8.54x4.20x4.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF82.33x14.78x
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ETON scores 5/9 vs CLDX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricETON logoETONEton Pharmaceutic…MNPR logoMNPRMonopar Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-18.8%-25.7%-43.0%-41.7%+22.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.8%-24.8%-40.2%-38.9%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.6%-3.2%-65.0%-35.2%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.5%-53.3%-49.3%-44.7%+11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954334
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x0.00x0.00x2.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$17M-$46M-$357M-$27M$14.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$26M$46M$357M$29M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$0$110,000$2M$16.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.07x3.10x
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — ETON and PRAX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ETON five years ago would be worth $39,216 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,621 for IQV. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricETON logoETONEton Pharmaceutic…MNPR logoMNPRMonopar Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+90.8%-5.4%+16.4%+23.4%-20.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+80.0%+59.7%+775.0%+76.2%+16.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+793.9%+1148.6%+1976.5%-0.1%-5.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+292.2%+136.5%-20.8%+22.0%-23.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+396.3%-52.9%-20.1%-43.3%+166.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+107.5%+132.0%+174.9%-0.0%-2.0%
Evenly matched — ETON and PRAX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ETON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ETON is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLDX's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETON currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs MNPR's 59.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricETON logoETONEton Pharmaceutic…MNPR logoMNPRMonopar Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.66x1.46x1.55x1.73x1.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$32.30$105.00$356.00$35.79$247.05
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.09$28.40$35.18$17.85$134.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.0%+59.5%+93.6%+93.1%+72.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10071.768.155.660.758.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded392K173K378K985K1.6M
ETON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ETON as "Buy", MNPR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", CLDX as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.6% upside for MNPR (target: $119) vs -19.4% for ETON (target: $25).

MetricETON logoETONEton Pharmaceutic…MNPR logoMNPRMonopar Therapeut…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IQV logoIQVIQVIA Holdings In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$119.00$544.40$45.00$225.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts613161944
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.1%
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

IQV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ETON leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallIQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ETON) is the stronger pick with 104. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ETON) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?

On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?

Over the past 5 years, Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ETON) delivered a total return of +292. 2%, compared to -23. 8% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETON returned +396. 3% versus MNPR's -52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ETON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning CLDX is approximately 163% more volatile than ETON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ETON) is pulling ahead at 104. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IQVIA Holdings Inc. grew EPS 4. 7% year-over-year, compared to -134. 5% for Monopar Therapeutics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ETON leads at 55. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?

IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -172. 5% for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -191. 6% for CLDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLDX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.

(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 37. 4x for Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNPR: 90. 6% to $119. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ETON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), +396. 3% 10Y return). Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETON: +396. 3%, CLDX: -43. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ETON and MNPR and PRAX and CLDX and IQV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ETON is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNPR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLDX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ETON

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 41%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNPR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLDX

Quality Business

  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 60%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IQV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.