Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $839M | $416M | $9.63B | $2.22B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $0.00 | $-92K | $2M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-19M | $-327M | $-259M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | — | — | 100.0% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.1% | — | — | -191.6% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | 37.4x | — | — | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $0.00 | $110K | $2M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $46M | $357M | $29M | $1.98B |
ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eton Pharmaceutical… (ETON) | 100 | 425.5 | +325.5% |
| Monopar Therapeutic… (MNPR) | 100 | 281.2 | +181.2% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Celldex Therapeutic… (CLDX) | 100 | 210.4 | +110.4% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ETON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 104.9%, EPS growth -13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 55.5%
- 396.3% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 1.57x
- Beta 0.66 vs CLDX's 1.73
MNPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.46, current ratio 11.47x
- 1.9K% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs IQV's +16.5%
Among these 5 stocks, CLDX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- Better valuation composite
- 8.3% margin vs CLDX's -172.5%
- 4.7% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs -65.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.9K% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs CLDX's -172.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs CLDX's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs IQV's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC 8.7% vs -65.0% |
ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 4 of 6 categories
ETON leads 1 • MNPR leads 0 • PRAX leads 0 • CLDX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $16.6B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLDX's -172.5%. On growth, ETON holds the edge at +82.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $0 | -$92,000 | $2M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | -$20M | -$357M | -$284M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$19M | -$327M | -$259M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$333,000 | -$11M | -$283M | -$213M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | — | — | +100.0% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | — | — | -191.6% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | — | — | -172.5% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | — | — | -142.2% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.7% | — | — | -93.6% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -3.4% | +2.7% | -73.2% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $839M | $416M | $9.6B | $2.2B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $822M | $370M | $9.3B | $2.2B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -182.47x | -45.90x | -24.72x | -8.54x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.37x | — | — | — | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.49x | — | — | 1477.19x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 31.91x | 13.03x | 8.54x | 4.20x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 82.33x | — | — | — | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-43 for PRAX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ETON scores 5/9 vs CLDX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.8% | -25.7% | -43.0% | -41.7% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.8% | -24.8% | -40.2% | -38.9% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | -3.2% | -65.0% | -35.2% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | -53.3% | -49.3% | -44.7% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | — | 0.00x | 0.00x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | -$46M | -$357M | -$27M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $46M | $357M | $29M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $0 | $110,000 | $2M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.07x | — | — | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ETON and PRAX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ETON five years ago would be worth $39,216 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,621 for IQV. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +90.8% | -5.4% | +16.4% | +23.4% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.0% | +59.7% | +775.0% | +76.2% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +793.9% | +1148.6% | +1976.5% | -0.1% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +292.2% | +136.5% | -20.8% | +22.0% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +396.3% | -52.9% | -20.1% | -43.3% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +107.5% | +132.0% | +174.9% | -0.0% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ETON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ETON is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLDX's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETON currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs MNPR's 59.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.46x | 1.55x | 1.73x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.30 | $105.00 | $356.00 | $35.79 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.09 | $28.40 | $35.18 | $17.85 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +59.5% | +93.6% | +93.1% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.7 | 68.1 | 55.6 | 60.7 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 392K | 173K | 378K | 985K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ETON as "Buy", MNPR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", CLDX as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.6% upside for MNPR (target: $119) vs -19.4% for ETON (target: $25).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $119.00 | $544.40 | $45.00 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 13 | 16 | 19 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ETON leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ETON vs MNPR vs PRAX vs CLDX vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ETON) is the stronger pick with 104. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ETON) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?
On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ETON) delivered a total return of +292. 2%, compared to -23. 8% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETON returned +396. 3% versus MNPR's -52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ETON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning CLDX is approximately 163% more volatile than ETON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ETON) is pulling ahead at 104. 9% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IQVIA Holdings Inc. grew EPS 4. 7% year-over-year, compared to -134. 5% for Monopar Therapeutics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ETON leads at 55. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -172. 5% for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -191. 6% for CLDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLDX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 37. 4x for Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNPR: 90. 6% to $119. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ETON or MNPR or PRAX or CLDX or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eton Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ETON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), +396. 3% 10Y return). Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETON: +396. 3%, CLDX: -43. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ETON and MNPR and PRAX and CLDX and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ETON is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNPR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLDX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.