Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EXFY vs CWAN vs APPF vs HUBS vs BILL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EXFY
Expensify, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$91M
5Y Perf.-97.7%
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.22B
5Y Perf.+11.7%
APPF
AppFolio, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.00B
5Y Perf.+38.3%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.16B
5Y Perf.-75.5%
BILL
Bill.com Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.14B
5Y Perf.-85.1%

EXFY vs CWAN vs APPF vs HUBS vs BILL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EXFY logoEXFY
CWAN logoCWAN
APPF logoAPPF
HUBS logoHUBS
BILL logoBILL
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Application
Market Cap$91M$7.22B$6.00B$10.16B$4.14B
Revenue (TTM)$140M$826M$995M$3.30B$1.60B
Net Income (TTM)$-21M$-48M$152M$100M$-7M
Gross Margin49.6%66.0%63.2%83.7%80.7%
Operating Margin-13.2%1.4%17.1%1.9%-1.8%
Forward P/E17.1x34.7x24.5x15.2x17.4x
Total Debt$6M$883M$71M$485M$1.77B
Cash & Equiv.$63M$91M$107M$882M$1.14B

EXFY vs CWAN vs APPF vs HUBS vs BILLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EXFY
CWAN
APPF
HUBS
BILL
StockNov 21May 26Return
Expensify, Inc. (EXFY)1002.3-97.7%
Clearwater Analytic… (CWAN)100111.7+11.7%
AppFolio, Inc. (APPF)100138.3+38.3%
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS)10024.5-75.5%
Bill.com Holdings, … (BILL)10014.9-85.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EXFY vs CWAN vs APPF vs HUBS vs BILL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: APPF leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. HUBS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EXFY
Expensify, Inc.
The Technology Pick

EXFY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
CWAN
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

CWAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 61.9%, EPS growth -108.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
  • 61.9% revenue growth vs EXFY's 2.1%
  • +6.1% vs HUBS's -70.1%
Best for: growth exposure
APPF
AppFolio, Inc.
The Income Pick

APPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.64
  • 12.5% 10Y total return vs HUBS's 359.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
  • Beta 0.64, current ratio 3.20x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
The Value Play

HUBS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (15.2x vs 17.4x)
Best for: value
BILL
Bill.com Holdings, Inc.
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, BILL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWAN logoCWAN61.9% revenue growth vs EXFY's 2.1%
ValueHUBS logoHUBSLower P/E (15.2x vs 17.4x)
Quality / MarginsAPPF logoAPPF15.3% margin vs EXFY's -14.7%
Stability / SafetyAPPF logoAPPFBeta 0.64 vs BILL's 1.88, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CWAN logoCWAN+6.1% vs HUBS's -70.1%
Efficiency (ROA)APPF logoAPPF24.2% ROA vs EXFY's -11.0%, ROIC 22.4% vs -16.8%

EXFY vs CWAN vs APPF vs HUBS vs BILL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EXFYExpensify, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription Fees
91.9%$131M
Interchange
15.0%$21M
Product and Service, Other
0.3%$365,000
Cashback Rewards
-7.1%$-10,085,000
CWANClearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$731M
APPFAppFolio, Inc.
FY 2025
Value Added Services
75.9%$722M
Subscription Services
22.2%$211M
Other Services
1.9%$18M
HUBSHubSpot, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
97.8%$3.1B
Service
2.2%$67M
BILLBill.com Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription And Transaction Fees
88.9%$1.3B
Interest On Funds Held For Customers
11.1%$162M

EXFY vs CWAN vs APPF vs HUBS vs BILL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEXFYLAGGINGBILL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — APPF and HUBS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

HUBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 23.6x EXFY's $140M. APPF is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXFY's -14.7%. On growth, CWAN holds the edge at +74.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$140M$826M$995M$3.3B$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$14M$94M$192M$166M$30M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$21M-$48M$152M$100M-$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$14M$152M$234M$712M$383M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.6%+66.0%+63.2%+83.7%+80.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.2%+1.4%+17.1%+1.9%-1.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-14.7%-5.8%+15.3%+3.0%-0.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.9%+18.5%+23.5%+21.6%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.8%+74.4%+20.4%+23.4%+13.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.2%-137.9%+37.2%+2.5%+2.1%
Evenly matched — APPF and HUBS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

EXFY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 42.9x trailing earnings, APPF trades at a 81% valuation discount to HUBS's 229.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, APPF's 33.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BILL's 539.8x.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…
Market CapShares × price$91M$7.2B$6.0B$10.2B$4.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$34M$8.0B$6.0B$9.8B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.46x-173.93x42.94x229.47x181.87x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.08x34.68x24.48x15.21x17.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple70.55x33.95x55.50x539.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.64x9.88x6.31x3.24x2.83x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.71x3.25x11.15x5.08x1.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.53x43.96x25.09x14.36x13.37x
EXFY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

APPF leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

APPF delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-15 for EXFY. EXFY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BILL's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BILL scores 7/9 vs CWAN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.3%-2.4%+30.9%+5.0%-0.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.0%-1.6%+24.2%+2.7%-0.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-16.8%+1.1%+22.4%+0.4%-1.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-13.1%+1.4%+25.9%+0.5%-1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–932567
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.43x0.13x0.23x0.45x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$57M$792M-$36M-$397M$633M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$63M$91M$107M$882M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$883M$71M$485M$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.22x6749.00x1.88x
APPF leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CWAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,080 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $250 for EXFY. Over the past 12 months, CWAN leads with a +6.1% total return vs HUBS's -70.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWAN at 18.4% vs EXFY's -48.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-29.3%+1.0%-27.7%-48.4%-17.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-66.5%+6.1%-22.8%-70.1%-12.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.2%+66.1%+20.9%-55.6%-57.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.5%-4.0%+30.8%-59.4%-70.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.5%-4.0%+1248.9%+359.7%+17.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-48.3%+18.4%+6.5%-23.7%-24.5%
CWAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CWAN and APPF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

APPF is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BILL's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWAN currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 28.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.93x0.79x0.64x1.01x1.88x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.06$25.07$326.04$682.57$57.21
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.69$15.74$142.72$180.50$34.44
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+33.5%+97.1%+51.1%+28.9%+73.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.270.856.255.646.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded874K4.0M346K1.5M1.9M
Evenly matched — CWAN and APPF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EXFY as "Buy", CWAN as "Hold", APPF as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", BILL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1241.5% upside for EXFY (target: $14) vs 2.5% for CWAN (target: $25).

MetricEXFY logoEXFYExpensify, Inc.CWAN logoCWANClearwater Analyt…APPF logoAPPFAppFolio, Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BILL logoBILLBill.com Holdings…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.75$24.96$236.67$306.10$54.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts913134732
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+10.0%+0.2%+3.2%+4.9%+10.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

EXFY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). APPF leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallExpensify, Inc. (EXFY)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EXFY vs CWAN vs APPF vs HUBS vs BILL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EXFY or CWAN or APPF or HUBS or BILL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is the stronger pick with 61. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Expensify, Inc. (EXFY). AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) offers the better valuation at 42. 9x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expensify, Inc. (EXFY) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EXFY or CWAN or APPF or HUBS or BILL?

On trailing P/E, AppFolio, Inc.

(APPF) is the cheapest at 42. 9x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 229. 5x. On forward P/E, HubSpot, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EXFY or CWAN or APPF or HUBS or BILL?

Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.

(APPF) delivered a total return of +30. 8%, compared to -97. 5% for Expensify, Inc. (EXFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1249% versus EXFY's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EXFY or CWAN or APPF or HUBS or BILL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AppFolio, Inc.

(APPF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Bill. com Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning BILL is approximately 193% more volatile than APPF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expensify, Inc. (EXFY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 45% for Bill. com Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EXFY or CWAN or APPF or HUBS or BILL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.

(CWAN) is pulling ahead at 61. 9% versus 2. 1% for Expensify, Inc. (EXFY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -108. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWAN leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EXFY or CWAN or APPF or HUBS or BILL?

AppFolio, Inc.

(APPF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 8% net margin versus -15. 1% for Expensify, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APPF leads at 16. 1% versus -12. 7% for EXFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EXFY or CWAN or APPF or HUBS or BILL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, HubSpot, Inc.

(HUBS) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. — 19. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXFY: 1241. 5% to $13. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EXFY or CWAN or APPF or HUBS or BILL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is EXFY or CWAN or APPF or HUBS or BILL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.

(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), +1249% 10Y return). Bill. com Holdings, Inc. (BILL) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1249%, BILL: +17. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EXFY and CWAN and APPF and HUBS and BILL?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: EXFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BILL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EXFY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWAN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APPF

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUBS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BILL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 48%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EXFY and CWAN and APPF and HUBS and BILL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EXFY: -5.8% · CWAN: 74.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.