Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FARM vs DENN vs USFD vs PFGC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
FARM vs DENN vs USFD vs PFGC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Restaurants | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $28M | $322M | $19.16B | $14.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $338M | $457M | $39.68B | $66.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $10M | $677M | $329M |
| Gross Margin | 40.7% | 43.8% | 17.4% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | 8.4% | 3.1% | 1.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.0x | 18.2x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $53M | $408M | $5.72B | $8.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $2M | $41M | $79M |
FARM vs DENN vs USFD vs PFGC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) | 100 | 16.6 | -83.4% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 488.5 | +388.5% |
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 339.8 | +239.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FARM vs DENN vs USFD vs PFGC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FARM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DENN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 19.9x)
- 2.2% margin vs FARM's -5.5%
- +39.8% vs FARM's -28.9%
USFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, current ratio 1.16x
- Beta 0.50 vs FARM's 0.79
- 4.8% ROA vs FARM's -11.7%, ROIC 9.3% vs -1.2%
PFGC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 249.2% 10Y total return vs USFD's 248.8%
- Beta 0.60, current ratio 1.58x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.2% margin vs FARM's -5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs FARM's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs FARM's -28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs FARM's -11.7%, ROIC 9.3% vs -1.2% |
FARM vs DENN vs USFD vs PFGC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FARM vs DENN vs USFD vs PFGC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
USFD leads in 2 of 6 categories
DENN leads 1 • FARM leads 1 • PFGC leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DENN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFGC is the larger business by revenue, generating $66.7B annually — 197.6x FARM's $338M. DENN is the more profitable business, keeping 2.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FARM's -5.5%. On growth, PFGC holds the edge at +6.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $338M | $457M | $39.7B | $66.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $55M | $1.6B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $10M | $677M | $329M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $2M | $848M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.7% | +43.8% | +17.4% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +8.4% | +3.1% | +1.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +2.2% | +1.7% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +0.5% | +2.1% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | +1.3% | +2.8% | +6.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -89.9% | +6.1% | -27.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FARM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 64% valuation discount to PFGC's 42.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FARM's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than USFD's 14.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $322M | $19.2B | $14.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $75M | $728M | $24.8B | $22.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.88x | 15.24x | 29.55x | 42.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.02x | 18.20x | 19.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.48x | 12.10x | 14.67x | 14.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.71x | 0.49x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | — | 4.64x | 3.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.32x | 350.62x | 19.98x | 20.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
USFD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USFD delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-48 for FARM. FARM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFGC's 1.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DENN scores 7/9 vs PFGC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.6% | — | +15.3% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.7% | +2.0% | +4.8% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +9.7% | +9.3% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | +11.9% | +12.0% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.23x | — | 1.33x | 1.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | $406M | $5.7B | $7.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $2M | $41M | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $53M | $408M | $5.7B | $8.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.88x | 1.73x | 3.94x | 1.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USFD five years ago would be worth $21,415 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,379 for FARM. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +39.8% total return vs FARM's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USFD at 31.2% vs FARM's -21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.5% | +0.6% | +16.4% | +5.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.9% | +39.8% | +25.7% | +11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.2% | -41.3% | +125.7% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.2% | -64.9% | +114.1% | +69.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | -42.9% | +248.8% | +249.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.8% | -16.3% | +31.2% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DENN and USFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
USFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FARM's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FARM's 51.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.65x | 0.50x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.48 | $6.26 | $102.13 | $109.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $3.36 | $66.89 | $77.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +99.8% | +85.1% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 66.9 | 51.0 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 283K | 0 | 2.2M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
PFGC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DENN as "Buy", USFD as "Buy", PFGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for USFD (target: $108) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $108.33 | $111.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 25 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% | +5.1% | +0.5% |
USFD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DENN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
FARM vs DENN vs USFD vs PFGC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FARM or DENN or USFD or PFGC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is the stronger pick with 8.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FARM or DENN or USFD or PFGC?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus Performance Food Group Company at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FARM or DENN or USFD or PFGC?
Over the past 5 years, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) delivered a total return of +114. 1%, compared to -86. 2% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFGC returned +249. 2% versus FARM's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FARM or DENN or USFD or PFGC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Farmer Bros. Co. 's 0. 79β — meaning FARM is approximately 58% more volatile than USFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 123% versus 179% for Performance Food Group Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FARM or DENN or USFD or PFGC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is pulling ahead at 8.
6% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: US Foods Holding Corp. grew EPS 45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -257. 9% for Farmer Bros. Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PFGC leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FARM or DENN or USFD or PFGC?
Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
8% net margin versus -4. 2% for Farmer Bros. Co. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DENN leads at 10. 0% versus -0. 4% for FARM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FARM or DENN or USFD or PFGC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Performance Food Group Company — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USFD: 24. 7% to $108. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FARM or DENN or USFD or PFGC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FARM or DENN or USFD or PFGC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), +248. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (USFD: +248. 8%, FARM: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FARM and DENN and USFD and PFGC?
These companies operate in different sectors (FARM (Consumer Defensive) and DENN (Consumer Cyclical) and USFD (Consumer Defensive) and PFGC (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FARM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; USFD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PFGC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.