Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs HOMB vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs HOMB vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.73B | $4.65B | $3.11B | $5.27B | $2.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $878M | $739M | $627M | $1.45B | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $140M | $243M | $-398M | $458M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 58.9% | 70.8% | 5.8% | 65.6% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 36.8% | -84.2% | 36.0% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 16.1x | 10.4x | 10.9x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $334M | $197M | $641M | $1.20B | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.16B | $763M | $380M | $910M | $108M |
FBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs HOMB vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FB Financial Corpor… (FBK) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 174.0 | +74.0% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 108.6 | +8.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs HOMB vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 174.7% 10Y total return vs CVBF's 55.8%
- PEG 1.50 vs CVBF's 4.45
- +21.7% vs FFIN's -5.5%
FFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 0.09x
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 14.1x)
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.16x
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SFNC's 0.96 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.7% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
FBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs HOMB vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs HOMB vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • FFIN leads 1 • FBK leads 1 • HOMB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.3x SFNC's $627M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $878M | $739M | $627M | $1.5B | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $98M | $310M | -$497M | $601M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $140M | $243M | -$398M | $458M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $302M | $290M | $755M | $354M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.9% | +70.8% | +5.8% | +65.6% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +36.8% | -84.2% | +36.0% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +30.2% | -63.4% | +27.7% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +39.6% | +71.7% | +29.1% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.2% | -7.7% | +42.1% | +26.0% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 39% valuation discount to FBK's 22.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBK offers better value at 2.92x vs HOMB's 4.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $4.6B | $3.1B | $5.3B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $4.1B | $3.4B | $5.6B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.95x | 20.95x | -7.27x | 13.31x | 13.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.25x | 16.06x | 10.39x | 10.87x | 14.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.92x | 4.02x | — | 4.37x | 4.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.64x | 14.31x | — | 10.08x | 12.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.11x | 6.29x | 4.95x | 3.63x | 4.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.44x | 2.91x | 0.85x | 1.35x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.50x | 15.87x | 6.91x | 12.48x | 12.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVBF's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.2% | +13.3% | -11.6% | +10.9% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.6% | -1.6% | +2.0% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +11.0% | -9.1% | +7.2% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +16.0% | -4.2% | +9.8% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.12x | 0.19x | 0.30x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$822M | -$566M | $261M | $292M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $763M | $380M | $910M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $334M | $197M | $641M | $1.2B | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.36x | 1.48x | -1.01x | 1.44x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBK five years ago would be worth $13,285 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,087 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, FBK leads with a +21.7% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBK at 25.8% vs FFIN's 9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.4% | +9.5% | +15.1% | -2.6% | +10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.7% | -5.5% | +18.1% | -3.1% | +12.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.9% | +30.3% | +41.6% | +31.7% | +80.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.9% | -29.1% | -17.3% | +10.0% | +8.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.7% | +128.6% | +19.7% | +49.0% | +55.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.8% | +9.2% | +12.3% | +9.6% | +21.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 84.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.87x | 0.96x | 0.74x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.37 | $38.74 | $22.18 | $30.83 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.29 | $28.11 | $17.00 | $25.50 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.5% | +84.4% | +96.7% | +86.8% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 59.1 | 57.4 | 54.4 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 273K | 665K | 1.1M | 1.4M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FBK as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.4% upside for FBK (target: $65) vs 7.2% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs FFIN's 2.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $65.00 | $39.25 | $23.00 | $31.50 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 15 | 9 | 19 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | +4.0% | +2.8% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 11 | 6 | 21 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.72 | $0.85 | $0.75 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +2.9% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FBK vs FFIN vs SFNC vs HOMB vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBK or FFIN or SFNC or HOMB or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FB Financial Corporation (FBK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBK or FFIN or SFNC or HOMB or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus FB Financial Corporation at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FB Financial Corporation wins at 1. 50x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 45x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBK or FFIN or SFNC or HOMB or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, FB Financial Corporation (FBK) delivered a total return of +32.
9%, compared to -29. 1% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBK returned +174. 7% versus SFNC's +19. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBK or FFIN or SFNC or HOMB or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 0. 96β — meaning SFNC is approximately 30% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 43% for CVB Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBK or FFIN or SFNC or HOMB or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBK or FFIN or SFNC or HOMB or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBK or FFIN or SFNC or HOMB or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, FB Financial Corporation (FBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 50x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 45x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBK: 23. 4% to $65. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBK or FFIN or SFNC or HOMB or CVBF?
In this comparison, CVBF (4.
0% yield), SFNC (4. 0% yield), HOMB (2. 8% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FBK or FFIN or SFNC or HOMB or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +49. 0%, FBK: +174. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBK and FFIN and SFNC and HOMB and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. FFIN, SFNC, HOMB, CVBF pay a dividend while FBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.