REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FBRT vs ARI vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
FBRT vs ARI vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $696M | $1.45B | $3.23B | $423M | $656M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $401M | $709M | $1.54B | $442M | $264M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $72M | $127M | $104M | $-104M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 59.9% | 66.2% | 62.6% | 87.1% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | 36.9% | 56.0% | 58.3% | 48.0% | 51.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 12.6x | 12.0x | — | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.25B | $7.92B | $16.16B | $4.69B | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $167M | $140M | $453M | $85M | $88M |
FBRT vs ARI vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin BSP Realty… (FBRT) | 100 | 55.1 | -44.9% |
| Apollo Commercial R… (ARI) | 100 | 72.1 | -27.9% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
| KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF) | 100 | 30.3 | -69.7% |
| TPG RE Finance Trus… (TRTX) | 100 | 65.0 | -35.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBRT vs ARI vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 18.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 18.43x
- Beta 0.74, yield 18.7%, current ratio 18.43x
- 18.7% yield, vs TRTX's 13.5%
ARI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth 183.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 60.5% 10Y total return vs BXMT's 50.5%
- Beta 0.60 vs KREF's 0.87
- +26.3% vs KREF's -16.9%
BXMT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, KREF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TRTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 123.3% FFO/revenue growth vs FBRT's -100.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 23.2% margin vs KREF's -23.6%
- 1.4% ROA vs KREF's -1.6%, ROIC 4.7% vs 3.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 123.3% FFO/revenue growth vs FBRT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs KREF's -23.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs KREF's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 18.7% yield, vs TRTX's 13.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.3% vs KREF's -16.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs KREF's -1.6%, ROIC 4.7% vs 3.4% |
FBRT vs ARI vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FBRT vs ARI vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARI leads 2 • KREF leads 1 • FBRT leads 0 • BXMT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 5.8x TRTX's $264M. TRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KREF's -23.6%. On growth, BXMT holds the edge at +4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $401M | $709M | $1.5B | $442M | $264M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $159M | $410M | $948M | $140M | $144M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $72M | $127M | $104M | -$104M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $121M | $40M | $335M | $65M | $96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.9% | +66.2% | +62.6% | +87.1% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.9% | +56.0% | +58.3% | +48.0% | +51.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +17.9% | +6.7% | -23.6% | +23.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +5.7% | +21.8% | +14.8% | +36.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -0.8% | +4.0% | -13.8% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.0% | 0.0% | — | -5.4% | +58.3% |
Valuation Metrics
KREF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, ARI trades at a 55% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRTX's 15.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FBRT's 49.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $696M | $1.4B | $3.2B | $423M | $656M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $9.2B | $18.9B | $5.0B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.13x | 13.47x | 29.92x | -6.27x | 14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.93x | 12.61x | 11.98x | — | 8.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.09x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 48.98x | 19.40x | 16.35x | 18.35x | 15.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.04x | 2.12x | 0.92x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.51x | 0.82x | 0.93x | 0.36x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.38x | 34.26x | 11.71x | 6.34x | 7.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARI delivers a 6.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-8 for KREF. FBRT carries lower financial leverage with a 2.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBRT scores 6/9 vs KREF's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +6.9% | +2.9% | -8.4% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.3% | +0.5% | -1.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +4.0% | +4.3% | +3.4% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +5.6% | +11.3% | +4.5% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.78x | 4.27x | 4.61x | 3.83x | 3.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.1B | $7.8B | $15.7B | $4.6B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $167M | $140M | $453M | $85M | $88M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $7.9B | $16.2B | $4.7B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.28x | 1.11x | 0.84x | 1.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARI five years ago would be worth $11,256 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,436 for KREF. Over the past 12 months, ARI leads with a +26.3% total return vs KREF's -16.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRTX at 26.7% vs KREF's -0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.6% | +13.2% | +0.7% | -17.5% | -1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.0% | +26.3% | +12.1% | -16.9% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.3% | +50.9% | +48.1% | -0.7% | +103.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.1% | +12.6% | -4.1% | -35.6% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.1% | +60.5% | +50.5% | -9.1% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | +14.7% | +14.0% | -0.2% | +26.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ARI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARI is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KREF's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARI currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs KREF's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.60x | 0.74x | 0.87x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.84 | $11.24 | $20.67 | $9.98 | $9.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.24 | $9.38 | $17.67 | $5.29 | $7.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +97.1% | +92.6% | +65.9% | +86.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 52.1 | 47.5 | 54.4 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 918K | 1.4M | 1.4M | 1.5M | 655K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBRT and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FBRT as "Buy", ARI as "Hold", BXMT as "Hold", KREF as "Buy", TRTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.6% upside for FBRT (target: $15) vs 6.4% for KREF (target: $7). For income investors, FBRT offers the higher dividend yield at 18.68% vs ARI's 9.32%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.33 | $12.00 | — | $7.00 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 18 | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +18.7% | +9.3% | +9.9% | +15.2% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.69 | $1.02 | $1.89 | $1.00 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | 0.0% | +3.4% | +10.3% | +3.9% |
TRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
FBRT vs ARI vs BXMT vs KREF vs TRTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBRT or ARI or BXMT or KREF or TRTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the stronger pick with 123. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBRT or ARI or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
On trailing P/E, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBRT or ARI or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
Over the past 5 years, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) delivered a total return of +12. 6%, compared to -35. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARI returned +60. 5% versus FBRT's -11. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBRT or ARI or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning KREF is approximately 46% more volatile than ARI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBRT or ARI or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is pulling ahead at 123. 3% versus -100. 0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. grew EPS 183. 5% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BXMT leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBRT or ARI or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 1% net margin versus -10. 3% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRTX leads at 73. 0% versus 36. 9% for FBRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KREF leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBRT or ARI or BXMT or KREF or TRTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBRT: 69. 6% to $15. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBRT or ARI or BXMT or KREF or TRTX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) offers the highest yield at 18. 7%, versus 9. 3% for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI).
09Is FBRT or ARI or BXMT or KREF or TRTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.
(ARI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 9. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARI: +60. 5%, KREF: -9. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBRT and ARI and BXMT and KREF and TRTX?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBRT is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KREF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TRTX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.