Consulting Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FC vs GP vs BLBD vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
Staffing & Employment Services
FC vs GP vs BLBD vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $261M | $27M | $2.24B | $349M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $262M | $16M | $1.49B | $3.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-16M | $133M | $-266M |
| Gross Margin | 75.4% | 11.6% | 21.0% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | -103.9% | 11.9% | -2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 60.2x | — | 15.6x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $20M | $90M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $344K | $229M | $33M |
FC vs GP vs BLBD vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin Covey Co. (FC) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| GreenPower Motor Co… (GP) | 100 | 5.2 | -94.8% |
| Blue Bird Corporati… (BLBD) | 100 | 493.7 | +393.7% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FC vs GP vs BLBD vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BLBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 22.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs FC's 38.3%
- 9.9% revenue growth vs GP's -49.5%
- 8.9% margin vs GP's -105.0%
KELYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 1.01, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.54x
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 15.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs GP's -49.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 15.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs GP's -105.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs GP's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.7% vs GP's -78.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.0% ROA vs GP's -50.9%, ROIC 102.6% vs -59.5% |
FC vs GP vs BLBD vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FC vs GP vs BLBD vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLBD leads in 3 of 6 categories
KELYA leads 2 • FC leads 0 • GP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLBD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 198.9x GP's $16M. BLBD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GP's -105.0%. On growth, BLBD holds the edge at -1.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $262M | $16M | $1.5B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | -$15M | $185M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$16M | $133M | -$266M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$3M | $197M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.4% | +11.6% | +21.0% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | -103.9% | +11.9% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -105.0% | +8.9% | -8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -17.3% | +13.2% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.3% | -54.0% | -1.7% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | +33.3% | +13.9% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, BLBD trades at a 81% valuation discount to FC's 94.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BLBD's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FC's 16.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $261M | $27M | $2.2B | $349M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $237M | $47M | $2.1B | $475M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 94.04x | -1.46x | 18.26x | -1.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 60.19x | — | 15.59x | 10.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.29x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.84x | — | 11.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.98x | 1.38x | 1.51x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.40x | — | 9.12x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.57x | — | 14.59x | 3.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLBD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLBD delivers a 50.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $-4 for GP. FC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLBD's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLBD scores 7/9 vs GP's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -3.7% | +50.8% | -24.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | -50.9% | +21.0% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | -59.5% | +102.6% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | -91.2% | +49.4% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | — | 0.35x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $20M | -$139M | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $344,244 | $229M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $20M | $90M | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.95x | -6.83x | 394.69x | -12.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLBD five years ago would be worth $26,732 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $60 for GP. Over the past 12 months, BLBD leads with a +87.7% total return vs GP's -78.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLBD at 53.1% vs GP's -66.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.6% | +25.5% | +51.5% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.3% | -78.0% | +87.7% | -12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.0% | -96.4% | +258.7% | -34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.3% | -99.4% | +167.3% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.3% | -93.2% | +557.8% | -33.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.8% | -66.8% | +53.1% | -13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FC and KELYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KELYA is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GP's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FC currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs GP's 15.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 1.67x | 1.15x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.70 | $6.42 | $81.51 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.16 | $0.74 | $36.01 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +15.4% | +86.9% | +64.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 51.3 | 60.0 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 188K | 488K | 357K | 361K |
Analyst Outlook
KELYA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FC as "Buy", BLBD as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.6% upside for KELYA (target: $15) vs -1.7% for BLBD (target: $70). KELYA is the only dividend payer here at 3.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | — | $69.67 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | 12 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.1% | 0.0% | +2.2% | +3.5% |
BLBD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KELYA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FC vs GP vs BLBD vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FC or GP or BLBD or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is the stronger pick with 9.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for GreenPower Motor Company Inc. (GP). Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Franklin Covey Co. (FC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FC or GP or BLBD or KELYA?
On trailing P/E, Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is the cheapest at 18.
3x versus Franklin Covey Co. at 94. 0x. On forward P/E, Kelly Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FC or GP or BLBD or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) delivered a total return of +167.
3%, compared to -99. 4% for GreenPower Motor Company Inc. (GP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLBD returned +557. 8% versus GP's -93. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FC or GP or BLBD or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus GreenPower Motor Company Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning GP is approximately 65% more volatile than KELYA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Covey Co. (FC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 35% for Blue Bird Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FC or GP or BLBD or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is pulling ahead at 9.
9% versus -49. 5% for GreenPower Motor Company Inc. (GP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blue Bird Corporation grew EPS 22. 8% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLBD leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FC or GP or BLBD or KELYA?
Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
6% net margin versus -94. 0% for GreenPower Motor Company Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLBD leads at 11. 3% versus -90. 3% for GP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FC leads at 76. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FC or GP or BLBD or KELYA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 60. 2x for Franklin Covey Co. — 49. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KELYA: 54. 6% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FC or GP or BLBD or KELYA?
In this comparison, KELYA (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FC, GP, BLBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FC or GP or BLBD or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 3. 2% yield). GreenPower Motor Company Inc. (GP) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KELYA: -33. 0%, GP: -93. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FC and GP and BLBD and KELYA?
These companies operate in different sectors (FC (Industrials) and GP (Consumer Cyclical) and BLBD (Consumer Cyclical) and KELYA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLBD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KELYA pays a dividend while FC, GP, BLBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.