Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FCBC vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FCBC vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $825M | $3.09B | $5.29B | $2.35B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $185M | $627M | $1.45B | $867M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $49M | $-398M | $458M | $169M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 90.3% | 5.8% | 65.6% | 72.1% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 34.0% | -84.2% | 36.0% | 25.3% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 10.3x | 10.8x | 10.8x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $641M | $1.20B | $327M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $512M | $380M | $910M | $185M | $52M |
FCBC vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Community Ban… (FCBC) | 100 | 202.4 | +102.4% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCBC vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 7.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.73x
- Beta 0.66, yield 7.6%, current ratio 0.73x
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
SFNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x)
HOMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.53 vs HOMB's 3.55
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs FCBC's 166.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs SFNC's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.5% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
FCBC vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FCBC vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
FCBC leads 1 • HOMB leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 7.8x FCBC's $185M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $185M | $627M | $1.5B | $867M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $67M | -$497M | $601M | $241M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $49M | -$398M | $458M | $169M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | $755M | $354M | $225M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.3% | +5.8% | +65.6% | +72.1% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | -84.2% | +36.0% | +25.3% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | -63.4% | +27.7% | +19.5% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +71.7% | +29.1% | +25.2% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +42.1% | +26.0% | +39.5% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 36% valuation discount to FCBC's 16.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $825M | $3.1B | $5.3B | $2.4B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | $3.4B | $5.6B | $2.5B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.32x | -7.24x | 13.36x | 13.53x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.86x | 10.35x | 10.82x | 10.80x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.93x | — | 4.39x | 1.92x | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.97x | — | 10.12x | 10.35x | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 4.93x | 3.64x | 2.71x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 0.84x | 1.36x | 1.21x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.75x | 6.88x | 12.53x | 10.75x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCBC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FCBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | -11.6% | +10.9% | +9.5% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | -1.6% | +2.0% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | -9.1% | +7.2% | +7.9% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | -4.2% | +9.8% | +2.4% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.19x | 0.30x | 0.17x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$511M | $261M | $292M | $142M | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $512M | $380M | $910M | $185M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $641M | $1.2B | $327M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.52x | -1.01x | 1.44x | 1.05x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FCBC and IBCP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FCBC five years ago would be worth $16,842 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, FCBC leads with a +17.5% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.0% | +14.6% | -3.0% | +9.3% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | +16.7% | -1.9% | +9.0% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.1% | +53.4% | +42.0% | +54.1% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.4% | -15.4% | +6.6% | +29.9% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.8% | +25.2% | +58.2% | +102.2% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.3% | +15.3% | +12.4% | +15.5% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCBC and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.02x | 0.82x | 0.89x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.10 | $22.18 | $30.83 | $46.92 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.21 | $17.00 | $25.68 | $39.20 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +96.3% | +87.1% | +96.1% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56 | 62.3 | 50.3 | 57.3 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 1.2M | 1.4M | 236K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCBC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FCBC as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -12.1% for FCBC (target: $38). For income investors, FCBC offers the higher dividend yield at 7.61% vs HOMB's 2.79%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $22.67 | $32.00 | $46.00 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 9 | 19 | 10 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.6% | +4.0% | +2.8% | +3.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 6 | 21 | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.29 | $0.85 | $0.75 | $1.43 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.4% | +1.8% |
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FCBC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
FCBC vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCBC or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCBC or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus First Community Bankshares, Inc. at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCBC or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) delivered a total return of +68. 4%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCBC or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 54% more volatile than FCBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCBC or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCBC or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB or IBCP?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCBC leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCBC or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for First Community Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCBC or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) offers the highest yield at 7. 6%, versus 2. 8% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB).
09Is FCBC or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 7. 6% yield, +166. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCBC: +166. 8%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCBC and SFNC and HOMB and NBTB and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FCBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.