Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FFAI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs LCID

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+72.2%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.13T
5Y Perf.+100.1%
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.

Auto - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.00B
5Y Perf.-93.8%

FFAI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs LCID — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FFAI logoFFAI
AMZN logoAMZN
MSFT logoMSFT
LCID logoLCID
IndustryAuto - ManufacturersSpecialty RetailSoftware - InfrastructureAuto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$7M$2.92T$3.13T$2.00B
Revenue (TTM)$642K$742.78B$318.27B$1.12B
Net Income (TTM)$-478M$90.80B$125.22B$-3.36B
Gross Margin-160.2%50.6%68.3%-145.0%
Operating Margin-512.6%11.5%46.8%-339.6%
Forward P/E34.8x25.3x
Total Debt$99M$152.99B$112.18B$861M
Cash & Equiv.$7M$86.81B$30.24B$998M

FFAI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs LCIDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FFAI
AMZN
MSFT
LCID
StockSep 20May 26Return
Faraday Future Inte… (FFAI)1000.0-100.0%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100172.2+72.2%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)100200.1+100.1%
Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID)1006.2-93.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FFAI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs LCID

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSFT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. LCID also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.
The Secondary Option

FFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Value Pick

AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 1.24 vs MSFT's 1.35
  • +43.7% vs LCID's -73.1%
Best for: valuation efficiency
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Income Pick

MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
  • Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

LCID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 67.6%, EPS growth 3.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.6%
  • 67.6% revenue growth vs FFAI's -31.3%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLCID logoLCID67.6% revenue growth vs FFAI's -31.3%
ValueMSFT logoMSFTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs FFAI's -745.2%
Stability / SafetyMSFT logoMSFTBeta 0.89 vs FFAI's 2.08, lower leverage
DividendsMSFT logoMSFT0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMZN logoAMZN+43.7% vs LCID's -73.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MSFT logoMSFT19.2% ROA vs FFAI's -151.6%, ROIC 24.9% vs -39.0%

FFAI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs LCID — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc.
FY 2023
Automobiles
100.0%$800,000
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B
LCIDLucid Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Regulatory Credits
100.0%$96M

FFAI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs LCID — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSFTLAGGINGLCID

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1156972.0x FFAI's $642,000. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FFAI's -745.2%. On growth, FFAI holds the edge at +3.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$642,000$742.8B$318.3B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$253M$155.9B$192.6B-$3.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$478M$90.8B$125.2B-$3.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$111M-$2.5B$72.9B-$4.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-160.2%+50.6%+68.3%-145.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-512.6%+11.5%+46.8%-3.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-745.2%+12.2%+39.3%-3.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-172.9%-0.3%+22.9%-4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.1%+16.6%+18.3%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.5%+74.8%+23.4%-44.2%
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 18% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$7M$2.92T$3.13T$2.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$99M$2.98T$3.21T$1.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.02x37.82x30.86x-0.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.34.77x25.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x1.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.47x19.72x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue12.88x4.07x11.10x1.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.06x7.14x9.15x2.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF378.98x43.66x
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MSFT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FFAI. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LCID's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs LCID's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.1%+23.3%+33.1%-193.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-151.6%+11.5%+19.2%-40.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.0%+14.7%+24.9%-98.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-55.5%+15.3%+29.7%-49.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94663
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.86x0.37x0.33x1.20x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$92M$66.2B$81.9B-$137M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$86.8B$30.2B$998M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$99M$153.0B$112.2B$861M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-36.15x39.96x55.65x-146.67x
MSFT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for FFAI. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs LCID's -73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs FFAI's -94.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-65.0%+19.7%-10.8%-45.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-67.1%+43.7%-2.1%-73.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+156.2%+39.5%-92.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+64.8%+72.5%-96.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+697.8%+787.7%-93.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-94.7%+36.8%+11.7%-57.2%
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AMZN and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFAI's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FFAI's 10.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.08x1.51x0.89x2.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.61$278.56$555.45$33.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.21$185.01$356.28$5.62
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+10.4%+97.3%+75.8%+18.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.581.154.034.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded39.5M45.5M32.5M12.9M
Evenly matched — AMZN and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FFAI as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", LCID as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.4% upside for LCID (target: $14) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFFAI logoFFAIFaraday Future In…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…LCID logoLCIDLucid Group, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$306.77$551.75$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2948115
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises19
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.6%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMZN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallMicrosoft Corporation (MSFT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FFAI vs AMZN vs MSFT vs LCID: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FFAI or AMZN or MSFT or LCID a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lucid Group, Inc.

(LCID) is the stronger pick with 67. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 3% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FFAI or AMZN or MSFT or LCID?

On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.

9x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FFAI or AMZN or MSFT or LCID?

Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.

5%, compared to -100. 0% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus FFAI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FFAI or AMZN or MSFT or LCID?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

89β versus Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning FFAI is approximately 135% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 120% for Lucid Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FFAI or AMZN or MSFT or LCID?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lucid Group, Inc.

(LCID) is pulling ahead at 67. 6% versus -31. 3% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. grew EPS 98. 9% year-over-year, compared to 3. 3% for Lucid Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LCID leads at 30. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FFAI or AMZN or MSFT or LCID?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus -660. 2% for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -277. 8% for FFAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FFAI or AMZN or MSFT or LCID more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 25. 3x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LCID: 131. 4% to $14. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FFAI or AMZN or MSFT or LCID?

In this comparison, MSFT (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. FFAI, AMZN, LCID do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FFAI or AMZN or MSFT or LCID better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (FFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, FFAI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FFAI and AMZN and MSFT and LCID?

These companies operate in different sectors (FFAI (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and MSFT (Technology) and LCID (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; LCID is a small-cap high-growth stock. MSFT pays a dividend while FFAI, AMZN, LCID do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FFAI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 155%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSFT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LCID

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FFAI and AMZN and MSFT and LCID on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FFAI: 311.1% · AMZN: 16.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.