Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FGBI vs BFST vs FFIN vs LKFN vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
FGBI vs BFST vs FFIN vs LKFN vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $149M | $902M | $4.61B | $1.63B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $196M | $512M | $739M | $422M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-56M | $88M | $243M | $103M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | -6.2% | 60.9% | 70.8% | 61.0% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | -35.0% | 22.2% | 36.8% | 29.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 23.5x | 9.2x | 15.9x | 14.4x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $186M | $551M | $197M | $184M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $846M | $411M | $763M | $57M | $599M |
FGBI vs BFST vs FFIN vs LKFN vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Guaranty Banc… (FGBI) | 100 | 87.0 | -13.0% |
| Business First Banc… (BFST) | 100 | 190.3 | +90.3% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 146.6 | +46.6% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGBI vs BFST vs FFIN vs LKFN vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, FGBI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BFST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 3.3% vs FGBI's 2.1%
- +19.9% vs FIS's -35.3%
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs FGBI's -19.9%
- 30.2% margin vs FGBI's -28.6%
- 1.6% ROA vs FGBI's -1.4%, ROIC 11.0% vs -11.8%
LKFN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- 142.7% 10Y total return vs BFST's 24.0%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.31 vs LKFN's 3.63
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.63
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs FGBI's -19.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs FGBI's -28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs FFIN's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.9% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs FGBI's -1.4%, ROIC 11.0% vs -11.8% |
FGBI vs BFST vs FFIN vs LKFN vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FGBI vs BFST vs FFIN vs LKFN vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
FGBI leads 1 • BFST leads 1 • LKFN leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 55.6x FGBI's $196M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FGBI's -28.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $196M | $512M | $739M | $422M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$65M | $119M | $310M | $130M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$56M | $88M | $243M | $103M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $88M | $290M | $104M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +60.9% | +70.8% | +61.0% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.0% | +22.2% | +36.8% | +29.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.6% | +17.2% | +30.2% | +24.5% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | +18.0% | +39.6% | +24.6% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +39.2% | -7.7% | +23.4% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FGBI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, BFST trades at a 84% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BFST offers better value at 0.89x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $149M | $902M | $4.6B | $1.6B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$511M | $1.0B | $4.0B | $1.8B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.26x | 9.92x | 20.76x | 15.61x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.52x | 9.22x | 15.92x | 14.42x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.89x | 3.98x | 3.93x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.75x | 14.17x | 13.49x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 1.76x | 6.23x | 3.87x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 0.91x | 2.89x | 2.12x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.79x | 15.73x | 15.72x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FFIN and LKFN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-23 for FGBI. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FGBI's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BFST scores 7/9 vs FGBI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.3% | +10.2% | +13.3% | +14.2% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +1.1% | +1.6% | +1.5% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.8% | +6.2% | +11.0% | +11.6% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.0% | +8.9% | +16.0% | +15.8% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.61x | 0.12x | 0.24x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$660M | $140M | -$566M | $127M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $846M | $411M | $763M | $57M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $186M | $551M | $197M | $184M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.54x | 0.59x | 1.48x | 0.82x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BFST five years ago would be worth $12,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BFST leads with a +19.9% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFST at 26.4% vs FGBI's -5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +75.1% | +7.1% | +8.5% | +12.7% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.9% | +19.9% | -3.2% | +9.0% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.5% | +101.8% | +29.1% | +48.1% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | +24.4% | -28.2% | +10.5% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.3% | +24.0% | +145.4% | +142.7% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.5% | +26.4% | +8.9% | +14.0% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FGBI and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FGBI currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.91x | 0.95x | 0.79x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.07 | $30.32 | $38.74 | $69.40 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.31 | $22.52 | $28.11 | $54.36 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +91.0% | +83.6% | +90.2% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 49.6 | 58.2 | 60.9 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 172K | 740K | 153K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LKFN and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FGBI as "Hold", BFST as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", LKFN as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 1.0% for FGBI (target: $10). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs FGBI's 0.43%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $32.33 | $39.25 | $66.00 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 4 | 15 | 10 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +2.1% | +2.2% | +3.2% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.57 | $0.72 | $2.00 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FGBI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FGBI vs BFST vs FFIN vs LKFN vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGBI or BFST or FFIN or LKFN or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 9% for First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (FGBI). Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGBI or BFST or FFIN or LKFN or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Business First Bancshares, Inc.
(BFST) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGBI or BFST or FFIN or LKFN or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Business First Bancshares, Inc.
(BFST) delivered a total return of +24. 4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGBI or BFST or FFIN or LKFN or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FFIN is approximately 26% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 82% for First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FGBI or BFST or FFIN or LKFN or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -19. 9% for First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (FGBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Business First Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 23. 0% year-over-year, compared to -614. 8% for First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGBI or BFST or FFIN or LKFN or FIS?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -28. 6% for First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -35. 0% for FGBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FGBI or BFST or FFIN or LKFN or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 23. 5x for First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — FGBI or BFST or FFIN or LKFN or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 0. 4% for First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (FGBI).
09Is FGBI or BFST or FFIN or LKFN or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 3. 2% yield, +142. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LKFN: +142. 7%, FGBI: +19. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FGBI and BFST and FFIN and LKFN and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FGBI (Financial Services) and BFST (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and LKFN (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FGBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFST is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. BFST, FFIN, LKFN, FIS pay a dividend while FGBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.