Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FLWS vs FTDR vs CAKE vs OTLY vs FRPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Personal Products & Services
Restaurants
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Packaged Foods
FLWS vs FTDR vs CAKE vs OTLY vs FRPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Personal Products & Services | Restaurants | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $292M | $4.76B | $3.03B | $336M | $2.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.55B | $2.12B | $3.75B | $893M | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $260M | $148M | $-152M | $200M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 54.3% | 78.3% | 32.6% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | -8.2% | 22.1% | 5.0% | -6.8% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.2x | 15.0x | — | 41.1x |
| Total Debt | $271M | $1.21B | $3.46B | $514M | $560M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $566M | $216M | $64M | $278M |
FLWS vs FTDR vs CAKE vs OTLY vs FRPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, … (FLWS) | 100 | 15.0 | -85.0% |
| Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| The Cheesecake Fact… (CAKE) | 100 | 103.4 | +3.4% |
| Oatly Group AB (OTLY) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 31.6 | -68.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLWS vs FTDR vs CAKE vs OTLY vs FRPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLWS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FTDR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 126.4% 10Y total return vs FRPT's 5.2%
- 13.6% revenue growth vs FLWS's -8.0%
- +28.1% vs FRPT's -31.1%
- 11.9% ROA vs OTLY's -19.5%, ROIC 31.2% vs -10.5%
CAKE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 41.1x)
- 1.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, OTLY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FRPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.91
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 183.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 46.3%, current ratio 5.54x
- Beta 0.91, current ratio 5.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs FLWS's -8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 41.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs OTLY's -17.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs OTLY's 1.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.1% vs FRPT's -31.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs OTLY's -19.5%, ROIC 31.2% vs -10.5% |
FLWS vs FTDR vs CAKE vs OTLY vs FRPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLWS vs FTDR vs CAKE vs OTLY vs FRPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTDR leads in 2 of 6 categories
FRPT leads 1 • FLWS leads 0 • CAKE leads 0 • OTLY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 4.2x OTLY's $893M. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OTLY's -17.1%. On growth, OTLY holds the edge at +15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $2.1B | $3.8B | $893M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$74M | $554M | $296M | -$21M | $165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | $260M | $148M | -$152M | $200M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $385M | $155M | -$28M | $223M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | +54.3% | +78.3% | +32.6% | +38.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | +22.1% | +5.0% | -6.8% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +12.3% | +4.0% | -17.1% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +18.2% | +4.1% | -3.2% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.6% | +5.9% | +4.4% | +15.6% | +13.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.3% | +18.8% | -28.6% | +4.8% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLWS and FTDR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.8x trailing earnings, CAKE trades at a 6% valuation discount to FRPT's 21.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FTDR's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAKE's 21.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $292M | $4.8B | $3.0B | $336M | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $516M | $5.4B | $6.3B | $786M | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.46x | 19.86x | 19.80x | -2.14x | 21.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.17x | 15.04x | — | 41.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.94x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.06x | 21.19x | — | 16.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 2.28x | 0.81x | 0.39x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 20.91x | 6.74x | 16.63x | 2.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.24x | 19.55x | — | 221.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTDR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTDR delivers a 99.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $100 in annual profit, vs $-4 for OTLY. FRPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OTLY's 26.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTDR scores 8/9 vs FLWS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.5% | +99.9% | +37.1% | -4.3% | +17.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.9% | +11.9% | +4.7% | -19.5% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.7% | +31.2% | +4.7% | -10.5% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.1% | +23.0% | +7.8% | -27.2% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | 5.01x | 7.93x | 26.12x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $225M | $646M | $3.2B | $449M | $282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $566M | $216M | $64M | $278M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $271M | $1.2B | $3.5B | $514M | $560M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.20x | 5.24x | 16.15x | -1.41x | 13.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTDR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTDR five years ago would be worth $12,895 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $267 for OTLY. Over the past 12 months, FTDR leads with a +28.1% total return vs FRPT's -31.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTDR at 30.9% vs OTLY's -37.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | +19.1% | +15.7% | -3.8% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.2% | +28.1% | +23.5% | +0.2% | -31.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.2% | +124.4% | +92.1% | -75.0% | -17.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | +29.0% | +2.1% | -97.3% | -68.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.5% | +126.4% | +35.6% | -97.3% | +517.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.7% | +30.9% | +24.3% | -37.0% | -6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTDR and FRPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OTLY's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FTDR currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs FLWS's 54.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.04x | 1.11x | 1.52x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.44 | $70.77 | $69.70 | $18.84 | $89.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.88 | $48.47 | $43.07 | $9.26 | $46.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.3% | +96.0% | +87.2% | +57.2% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 59.8 | 50.5 | 40.7 | 29.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 780K | 689K | 1.2M | 64K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLWS as "Buy", FTDR as "Hold", CAKE as "Hold", OTLY as "Hold", FRPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.4% upside for FLWS (target: $10) vs 2.1% for FTDR (target: $69). CAKE is the only dividend payer here at 1.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $69.33 | $65.50 | $14.64 | $73.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 12 | 48 | 18 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.08 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | +5.9% | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FTDR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FRPT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FLWS vs FTDR vs CAKE vs OTLY vs FRPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLWS or FTDR or CAKE or OTLY or FRPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) offers the better valuation at 19. 8x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLWS or FTDR or CAKE or OTLY or FRPT?
On trailing P/E, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) is the cheapest at 19.
8x versus Freshpet, Inc. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLWS or FTDR or CAKE or OTLY or FRPT?
Over the past 5 years, Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) delivered a total return of +29. 0%, compared to -97. 3% for Oatly Group AB (OTLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +517. 3% versus OTLY's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLWS or FTDR or CAKE or OTLY or FRPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Oatly Group AB's 1. 52β — meaning OTLY is approximately 68% more volatile than FRPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 26% for Oatly Group AB — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLWS or FTDR or CAKE or OTLY or FRPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontdoor, Inc.
(FTDR) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -8. 0% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc. (FLWS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for 1-800-FLOWERS. COM, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRPT leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLWS or FTDR or CAKE or OTLY or FRPT?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus -17. 7% for Oatly Group AB — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTDR leads at 19. 1% versus -12. 2% for FLWS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAKE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLWS or FTDR or CAKE or OTLY or FRPT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (CAKE) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 41. 1x for Freshpet, Inc. — 26. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLWS: 107. 4% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLWS or FTDR or CAKE or OTLY or FRPT?
In this comparison, CAKE (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FLWS, FTDR, OTLY, FRPT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLWS or FTDR or CAKE or OTLY or FRPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), +517. 3% 10Y return). Oatly Group AB (OTLY) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRPT: +517. 3%, OTLY: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLWS and FTDR and CAKE and OTLY and FRPT?
These companies operate in different sectors (FLWS (Consumer Cyclical) and FTDR (Consumer Cyclical) and CAKE (Consumer Cyclical) and OTLY (Consumer Defensive) and FRPT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
CAKE pays a dividend while FLWS, FTDR, OTLY, FRPT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.