Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYW vs PAYO vs RELY vs RPAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
FLYW vs PAYO vs RELY vs RPAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $2.12B | $1.74B | $4.80B | $307M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $188.60B | $1.07B | $1.73B | $313M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12.54B | $72M | $106M | $-259M |
| Gross Margin | 0.2% | 61.9% | 43.6% | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 11.7% | 6.9% | -35.9% |
| Forward P/E | 49.5x | 20.4x | 44.1x | 3.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $72M | $220M | $437M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $330M | $416M | $542M | $116M |
FLYW vs PAYO vs RELY vs RPAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 40.4 | -59.6% |
| Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 62.1 | -37.9% |
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 100 | 15.2 | -84.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLYW vs PAYO vs RELY vs RPAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +62.7% vs PAYO's -17.9%
PAYO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -47.7% 10Y total return vs FLYW's -49.5%
- 6.8% margin vs RPAY's -82.7%
RELY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.19
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 3.30x
- Beta 1.19, current ratio 3.30x
RPAY is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (3.9x vs 44.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs RPAY's -1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.9x vs 44.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs RPAY's -82.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs PAYO's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs PAYO's -17.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs RPAY's -20.3%, ROIC 14.2% vs -1.0% |
FLYW vs PAYO vs RELY vs RPAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLYW vs PAYO vs RELY vs RPAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYO leads in 2 of 6 categories
RPAY leads 1 • RELY leads 1 • FLYW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAYO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 603.1x RPAY's $313M. PAYO is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPAY's -82.7%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $188.6B | $1.1B | $1.7B | $313M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.8B | $208M | $149M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12.5B | $72M | $106M | -$259M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15.8B | $215M | $256M | $61M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +61.9% | +43.6% | +55.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +11.7% | +6.9% | -35.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +6.8% | +6.1% | -82.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | +20.2% | +14.8% | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1408.6% | +6.1% | +25.2% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +20.0% | +3.6% | -34.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RPAY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, PAYO trades at a 83% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RPAY's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $1.7B | $4.8B | $307M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1.4B | $4.5B | $629M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 161.18x | 26.63x | 73.52x | -1.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.50x | 20.42x | 44.06x | 3.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.80x | 7.36x | 41.98x | 6.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.40x | 1.66x | 2.94x | 0.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.71x | 2.71x | 5.71x | 0.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.41x | 8.44x | 16.24x | 3.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RELY delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-47 for RPAY. PAYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RPAY's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs RPAY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | +10.0% | +12.7% | -46.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +0.9% | +8.1% | -20.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +30.7% | +14.2% | -1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +14.9% | +9.4% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | 0.25x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$330M | -$343M | -$322M | $321M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $330M | $416M | $542M | $116M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $72M | $220M | $437M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 17.23x | 16.25x | -36.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RELY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLYW five years ago would be worth $5,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,624 for RPAY. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs PAYO's -17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RELY at 7.8% vs RPAY's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.6% | -7.0% | +72.4% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.7% | -17.9% | +8.1% | -7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.1% | -9.0% | +25.4% | -44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.5% | -49.8% | -53.0% | -83.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.5% | -47.7% | -53.0% | -63.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.7% | -3.1% | +7.8% | -17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and RELY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RELY is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAYO's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs RPAY's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.65x | 1.19x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.05 | $7.67 | $24.71 | $6.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.79 | $4.08 | $12.08 | $2.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +66.0% | +92.2% | +57.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 83.0 | 45.1 | 85.3 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 3.5M | 3.4M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLYW as "Buy", PAYO as "Buy", RELY as "Buy", RPAY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.7% upside for RPAY (target: $7) vs -7.9% for RELY (target: $21).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $7.50 | $21.00 | $6.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 10 | 13 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.7% | +10.0% | +1.1% | +12.5% |
PAYO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RPAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FLYW vs PAYO vs RELY vs RPAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYW or PAYO or RELY or RPAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLYW or PAYO or RELY or RPAY?
On trailing P/E, Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Repay Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLYW or PAYO or RELY or RPAY?
Over the past 5 years, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) delivered a total return of -49.
5%, compared to -83. 8% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAYO returned -47. 7% versus RPAY's -63. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLYW or PAYO or RELY or RPAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus Payoneer Global Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning PAYO is approximately 39% more volatile than RELY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 91% for Repay Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLYW or PAYO or RELY or RPAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus -1. 2% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -26. 3% for Repay Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELY leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLYW or PAYO or RELY or RPAY?
Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 0% net margin versus -83. 0% for Repay Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAYO leads at 11. 8% versus -3. 9% for RPAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAYO leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLYW or PAYO or RELY or RPAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) trades at 3.
9x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 45. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RPAY: 95. 7% to $6. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLYW or PAYO or RELY or RPAY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FLYW or PAYO or RELY or RPAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19)). Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RELY: -53. 0%, PAYO: -47. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLYW and PAYO and RELY and RPAY?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock; RPAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.