Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Banks - Regional
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $380M | $29.66B | $41.99B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $14.30B | $21.97B | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $1.74B | $2.98B | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 62.3% | 56.5% | 58.5% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 14.8x | 12.0x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $300M | $16.43B | $36.79B | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $61.13B | $116.10B | $119M |
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers & Merchants… (FMAO) | 100 | 127.3 | +27.3% |
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMAO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 3.2%
- PEG 0.72 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Beta 1.04, yield 3.2%, current ratio 13.43x
- NIM 3.0% vs STT's 0.8%
NTRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +66.6% vs FMAO's +15.0%
STT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- 186.8% 10Y total return vs NTRS's 170.2%
- 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.72 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.6% vs FMAO's +15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FMAO leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTRS leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • STT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FMAO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STT is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.0B annually — 244.0x CZWI's $90M. FMAO is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRS's 12.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $14.3B | $22.0B | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $3.2B | $4.3B | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $1.7B | $3.0B | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $4.7B | -$6.1B | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.3% | +56.5% | +58.5% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +16.3% | +15.5% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +12.1% | +12.2% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +38.2% | -64.3% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | +7.1% | +23.0% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FMAO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, FMAO trades at a 56% valuation discount to NTRS's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FMAO offers better value at 0.60x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $380M | $29.7B | $42.0B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $583M | -$15.0B | -$37.3B | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.11x | 18.31x | 18.12x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.81x | 14.80x | 11.99x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.60x | 1.86x | 2.05x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.70x | -4.68x | -9.33x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.01x | 2.07x | 1.91x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 2.33x | 1.78x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.99x | 5.43x | — | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FMAO scores 8/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +13.4% | +10.8% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +6.0% | +4.6% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +9.0% | +4.6% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 1.27x | 1.45x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $202M | -$44.7B | -$79.3B | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $61.1B | $116.1B | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $300M | $16.4B | $36.8B | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.38x | 0.42x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STT five years ago would be worth $18,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,428 for FMAO. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +66.6% total return vs FMAO's +15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FMAO's 15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.7% | +15.5% | +16.6% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.0% | +66.6% | +66.2% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.8% | +131.7% | +128.4% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | +46.7% | +86.2% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.5% | +170.2% | +186.8% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.2% | +32.3% | +31.7% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STT and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.14x | 1.19x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.79 | $173.19 | $156.18 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.59 | $97.00 | $90.94 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +92.4% | +95.3% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 59.4 | 63.9 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 54K | 1.1M | 2.0M | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FMAO and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FMAO as "Hold", NTRS as "Hold", STT as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for STT (target: $160) vs -3.9% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, FMAO offers the higher dividend yield at 3.20% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $153.75 | $160.44 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 35 | 37 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.0% | +2.3% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $3.14 | $3.42 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +4.3% | +6.9% | +3.1% |
FMAO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NTRS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger pick with 19.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate State Street Corporation (STT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Northern Trust Corporation at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 72x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, State Street Corporation (STT) delivered a total return of +86.
2%, compared to +44. 3% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STT returned +186. 8% versus FMAO's +144. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning STT is approximately 159% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), State Street Corporation (STT) is pulling ahead at 19.
6% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI?
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus 12. 1% for Northern Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FMAO leads at 22. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FMAO leads at 62. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for Northern Trust Corporation — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STT: 7. 8% to $160. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, STT: +186. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMAO and NTRS and STT and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FMAO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.