Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI vs BK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Banks - Regional
Asset Management
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI vs BK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Regional | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $383M | $29.73B | $42.19B | $206M | $89.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $14.30B | $21.97B | $90M | $39.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $1.74B | $2.98B | $14M | $5.24B |
| Gross Margin | 62.3% | 56.5% | 58.5% | 54.7% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 7.0% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 14.8x | 12.0x | 11.8x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $300M | $16.43B | $36.79B | $52M | $45.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $61.13B | $116.10B | $119M | $101.94B |
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI vs BK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers & Merchants… (FMAO) | 100 | 128.2 | +28.2% |
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 203.0 | +103.0% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 245.2 | +145.2% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 291.2 | +191.2% |
| The Bank of New Yor… (BK) | 100 | 351.1 | +251.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI vs BK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMAO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.72 vs BK's 2.89
- NIM 3.0% vs STT's 0.8%
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 14.9x), PEG 0.72 vs 2.89
- 3.2% yield, vs BK's 1.4%
NTRS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +62.9% vs FMAO's +13.9%
STT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.45, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.45 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage
BK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 266.6% 10Y total return vs STT's 187.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 14.9x), PEG 0.72 vs 2.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs STT's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs BK's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.9% vs FMAO's +13.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI vs BK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI vs BK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FMAO leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTRS leads 1 • BK leads 1 • STT leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FMAO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BK is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.6B annually — 439.1x CZWI's $90M. FMAO is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BK's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $14.3B | $22.0B | $90M | $39.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $3.2B | $4.3B | $9M | $8.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $1.7B | $3.0B | $14M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $36M | $4.7B | -$6.1B | $11M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.3% | +56.5% | +58.5% | +54.7% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +16.3% | +15.5% | +7.0% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +12.1% | +12.2% | +16.0% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +38.2% | -64.3% | +11.5% | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | +7.1% | +23.0% | +63.0% | +25.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FMAO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.2x trailing earnings, FMAO trades at a 64% valuation discount to BK's 22.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FMAO offers better value at 0.60x vs BK's 4.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $29.7B | $42.2B | $206M | $89.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $585M | -$15.0B | -$37.1B | $139M | $33.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.17x | 18.35x | 18.21x | 14.66x | 22.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.81x | 14.84x | 12.05x | 11.76x | 14.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.60x | 1.86x | 2.06x | 2.89x | 4.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.76x | -4.66x | -9.28x | 15.63x | 4.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.02x | 2.08x | 1.92x | 2.29x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 2.33x | 1.78x | 1.11x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.06x | 5.45x | — | 19.85x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FMAO scores 8/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +13.4% | +10.8% | +7.8% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +0.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +6.0% | +4.6% | +2.0% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +9.0% | +4.6% | +0.6% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 1.27x | 1.45x | 0.28x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $202M | -$44.7B | -$79.3B | -$67M | -$56.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $61.1B | $116.1B | $119M | $101.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $300M | $16.4B | $36.8B | $52M | $45.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.38x | 0.42x | 0.16x | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BK five years ago would be worth $26,597 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,575 for FMAO. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +62.9% total return vs FMAO's +13.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BK at 48.6% vs FMAO's 15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.4% | +15.7% | +17.1% | +24.0% | +12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.9% | +62.9% | +62.4% | +46.0% | +55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.7% | +132.2% | +129.4% | +165.0% | +228.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | +45.9% | +85.7% | +73.0% | +166.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.7% | +170.8% | +187.9% | +161.7% | +266.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.4% | +32.4% | +31.9% | +38.4% | +48.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STT and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STT currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs NTRS's 92.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.13x | 1.19x | 0.45x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.79 | $173.19 | $156.18 | $22.62 | $139.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.59 | $98.50 | $92.23 | $12.83 | $84.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +92.6% | +95.7% | +94.6% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 53.3 | 58.2 | 64.4 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 1.1M | 2.0M | 40K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FMAO and BK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FMAO as "Hold", NTRS as "Hold", STT as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", BK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.3% upside for STT (target: $160) vs -4.2% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, FMAO offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs BK's 1.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $153.75 | $160.44 | — | $139.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 35 | 37 | 2 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.0% | +2.3% | +1.7% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.88 | $3.14 | $3.42 | $0.37 | $1.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +4.3% | +6.9% | +3.0% | +3.4% |
FMAO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NTRS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FMAO vs NTRS vs STT vs CZWI vs BK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI or BK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger pick with 19.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the better valuation at 8. 2x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate State Street Corporation (STT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI or BK?
On trailing P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) is the cheapest at 8. 2x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation at 22. 5x. On forward P/E, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 72x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's 2. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI or BK?
Over the past 5 years, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) delivered a total return of +166.
0%, compared to +45. 8% for Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BK returned +266. 6% versus FMAO's +145. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI or BK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning STT is approximately 162% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI or BK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), State Street Corporation (STT) is pulling ahead at 19.
6% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI or BK?
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.
(FMAO) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus 11. 5% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FMAO leads at 22. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FMAO leads at 62. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI or BK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's 2. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STT: 7. 3% to $160. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI or BK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (FMAO) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 4% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK).
09Is FMAO or NTRS or STT or CZWI or BK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 7% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, STT: +187. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMAO and NTRS and STT and CZWI and BK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FMAO is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.