Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FOLD vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs EDIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
FOLD vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs EDIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4.55B | $8.75B | $2.57B | $398M | $297M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $634M | $417M | $669M | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $225M | $-609M | $-223M | $-160M |
| Gross Margin | 87.9% | 92.8% | 83.6% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 42.8% | -83.9% | — | — |
| Forward P/E | 40.6x | 39.3x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $483M | $9M | $1.28B | $25M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $214M | $496M | $434M | $78M | $147M |
FOLD vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs EDIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 116.2 | +16.2% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 502.5 | +402.5% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 19.0 | -81.0% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 9.1 | -90.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOLD vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs EDIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 0.63
- Beta 0.63 vs EDIT's 2.52
- +137.9% vs RCKT's -45.2%
KRYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 128.0%
- 26.9% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 9.95x
RARE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
RCKT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, EDIT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.9% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs EDIT's 2.52 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.9% vs RCKT's -45.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs EDIT's -74.2% |
FOLD vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FOLD vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs EDIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 4 of 6 categories
FOLD leads 1 • RARE leads 0 • RCKT leads 0 • EDIT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, KRYS holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $634M | $417M | $669M | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $185M | -$536M | -$232M | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | $225M | -$609M | -$223M | -$160M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $237M | -$487M | -$190M | -$166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.9% | +92.8% | +83.6% | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +42.8% | -83.9% | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +53.9% | -91.0% | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +56.9% | -72.8% | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.7% | +31.9% | -2.4% | — | -151.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -89.0% | +52.5% | -17.2% | +38.7% | +105.5% |
Valuation Metrics
KRYS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KRYS's 49.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $8.7B | $2.6B | $398M | $297M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $8.3B | $3.4B | $345M | $168M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -164.85x | 43.38x | -4.48x | -1.83x | -1.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.62x | 39.33x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 114.88x | 49.21x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.17x | 22.48x | 3.82x | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.29x | 7.29x | — | 1.47x | 9.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 152.43x | 46.30x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRYS scores 5/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.0% | +19.3% | -6.1% | -80.5% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.2% | +17.6% | -45.8% | -67.5% | -74.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +18.0% | -89.4% | -63.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +14.8% | -46.4% | -58.9% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.76x | 0.01x | — | 0.09x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $269M | -$487M | $842M | -$53M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $214M | $496M | $434M | $78M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $483M | $9M | $1.3B | $25M | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.00x | — | -14.49x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $41,919 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 50.1% vs RCKT's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +20.2% | +10.7% | +6.1% | +47.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.9% | +116.9% | -21.8% | -45.2% | +127.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.0% | +238.5% | -44.5% | -82.8% | -68.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.6% | +319.2% | -77.2% | -91.6% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.2% | +2688.5% | -59.4% | -91.3% | -90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | +50.1% | -17.8% | -44.4% | -32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.12x | 1.42x | 1.31x | 2.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.50 | $303.00 | $42.37 | $7.39 | $4.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $122.80 | $18.29 | $2.19 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +97.9% | +61.7% | +49.7% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.2 | 64.3 | 66.6 | 54.4 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 264K | 1.8M | 3.5M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FOLD as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.0% upside for EDIT (target: $6) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $332.75 | $51.50 | $5.00 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 17 | 33 | 19 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KRYS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FOLD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
FOLD vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOLD or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or EDIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (39. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOLD or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or EDIT?
On forward P/E, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 39. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOLD or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or EDIT?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +319. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +26. 9% versus RCKT's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOLD or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or EDIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately 299% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOLD or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or EDIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOLD leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOLD or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or EDIT?
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOLD or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or EDIT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) trades at 39. 3x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EDIT: 98. 0% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOLD or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or EDIT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FOLD or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, EDIT: -90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOLD and KRYS and RARE and RCKT and EDIT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.