Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FRPH vs ILPT vs PLD vs EGP vs FR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
FRPH vs ILPT vs PLD vs EGP vs FR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $406M | $527M | $132.16B | $10.96B | $8.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $453M | $8.74B | $737M | $744M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-54M | $3.21B | $293M | $342M |
| Gross Margin | 64.1% | 10.9% | 67.7% | 36.1% | 47.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 33.1% | 47.0% | 40.3% | 38.3% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | — | 41.4x | 36.1x | 29.8x |
| Total Debt | $179M | $4.22B | $31.49B | $1.75B | $2.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $149M | $183M | $1.32B | $1M | $78M |
FRPH vs ILPT vs PLD vs EGP vs FR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| Industrial Logistic… (ILPT) | 100 | 42.2 | -57.8% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
| EastGroup Propertie… (EGP) | 100 | 175.4 | +75.4% |
| First Industrial Re… (FR) | 100 | 164.8 | +64.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRPH vs ILPT vs PLD vs EGP vs FR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRPH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 15.45x
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 29.8x)
ILPT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +177.7% vs FRPH's -23.0%
Among these 5 stocks, PLD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 283.1% 10Y total return vs PLD's 259.1%
- PEG 3.00 vs FR's 7.28
- 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs FRPH's 0.6%
FR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.68, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.14x
- 46.0% margin vs ILPT's -11.9%
- 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs FRPH's 0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 29.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs ILPT's -11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs ILPT's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +177.7% vs FRPH's -23.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 4.5% vs 2.2% |
FRPH vs ILPT vs PLD vs EGP vs FR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FRPH vs ILPT vs PLD vs EGP vs FR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
EGP leads 1 • FR leads 1 • FRPH leads 0 • PLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLD and FR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 205.8x FRPH's $42M. FR is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ILPT's -11.9%. On growth, EGP holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $453M | $8.7B | $737M | $744M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $306M | $6.7B | $517M | $477M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$54M | $3.2B | $293M | $342M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $29M | $65M | $5.2B | $418M | $483M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.1% | +10.9% | +67.7% | +36.1% | +47.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +33.1% | +47.0% | +40.3% | +38.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | -11.9% | +36.7% | +39.7% | +46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +67.9% | +14.4% | +59.3% | +56.7% | +64.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | +4.0% | +8.7% | +10.2% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.5% | +57.6% | -24.1% | +55.3% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ILPT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.4x trailing earnings, FR trades at a 47% valuation discount to FRPH's 62.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.28x vs FR's 8.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $406M | $527M | $132.2B | $11.0B | $8.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $436M | $4.6B | $162.3B | $12.7B | $10.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 62.53x | -7.91x | 35.49x | 41.87x | 33.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.57x | — | 41.39x | 36.09x | 29.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.28x | 3.48x | 8.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.76x | 14.59x | 23.20x | 25.20x | 21.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.73x | 1.17x | 16.11x | 15.19x | 11.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 0.58x | 2.32x | 3.11x | 3.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.02x | 8.69x | 26.90x | 27.07x | 72.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FRPH and FR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ILPT. FRPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILPT's 4.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRPH scores 6/9 vs ILPT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | -5.9% | +5.6% | +8.4% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | -1.0% | +3.3% | +5.5% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +2.2% | +3.8% | +4.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +3.3% | +4.8% | +5.6% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 4.69x | 0.54x | 0.50x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | $4.0B | $30.2B | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $149M | $183M | $1.3B | $1M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $179M | $4.2B | $31.5B | $1.8B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.72x | 0.61x | 5.27x | 8.68x | 4.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGP five years ago would be worth $14,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,803 for ILPT. Over the past 12 months, ILPT leads with a +177.7% total return vs FRPH's -23.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILPT at 62.2% vs FRPH's -8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +44.8% | +11.1% | +14.2% | +8.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.0% | +177.7% | +39.4% | +27.1% | +32.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.9% | +326.6% | +20.8% | +28.7% | +24.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.4% | -62.0% | +37.7% | +46.8% | +41.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.8% | -41.0% | +259.1% | +283.1% | +201.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.7% | +62.2% | +6.5% | +8.8% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
EGP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ILPT's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGP currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs FRPH's 74.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.62x | 0.73x | 0.52x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.38 | $8.19 | $145.44 | $204.19 | $64.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.54 | $2.84 | $103.02 | $159.37 | $47.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +96.6% | +97.8% | +99.9% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 71.4 | 58.4 | 62.1 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 312K | 3.1M | 337K | 913K |
Analyst Outlook
FR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ILPT as "Buy", PLD as "Buy", EGP as "Hold", FR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.1% upside for FR (target: $65) vs -6.4% for ILPT (target: $7). For income investors, FR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs ILPT's 1.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.40 | $144.43 | $204.73 | $65.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 42 | 33 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +2.6% | +2.8% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 11 | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | $3.74 | $5.67 | $1.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
ILPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). EGP leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
FRPH vs ILPT vs PLD vs EGP vs FR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRPH or ILPT or PLD or EGP or FR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH). First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (29. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRPH or ILPT or PLD or EGP or FR?
On trailing P/E, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
(FR) is the cheapest at 33. 4x versus FRP Holdings, Inc. at 62. 5x. On forward P/E, FRP Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: EastGroup Properties, Inc. wins at 3. 00x versus First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 's 7. 28x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRPH or ILPT or PLD or EGP or FR?
Over the past 5 years, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) delivered a total return of +46. 8%, compared to -62. 0% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGP returned +283. 1% versus ILPT's -41. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRPH or ILPT or PLD or EGP or FR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's 1. 62β — meaning ILPT is approximately 210% more volatile than EGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRPH or ILPT or PLD or EGP or FR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 0. 6% for FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Industrial Logistics Properties Trust grew EPS 31. 5% year-over-year, compared to -13. 8% for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRPH or ILPT or PLD or EGP or FR?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus -14. 7% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 28. 0% for FRPH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPH leads at 91. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRPH or ILPT or PLD or EGP or FR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 00x versus First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 's 7. 28x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for Prologis, Inc. — 23. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FR: 4. 1% to $65. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRPH or ILPT or PLD or EGP or FR?
In this comparison, FR (2.
8% yield), EGP (2. 8% yield), PLD (2. 6% yield), ILPT (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. FRPH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRPH or ILPT or PLD or EGP or FR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 8% yield, +283. 1% 10Y return). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGP: +283. 1%, ILPT: -41. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRPH and ILPT and PLD and EGP and FR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ILPT, PLD, EGP, FR pay a dividend while FRPH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.