Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FUN
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.84B
5Y Perf.-38.1%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$203.09B
5Y Perf.+52.5%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CA
Market Cap$26.78B
5Y Perf.+41.4%
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$119.60B
5Y Perf.+36.5%

FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FUN logoFUN
MCD logoMCD
QSR logoQSR
SBUX logoSBUX
IndustryLeisureRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$1.84B$203.09B$26.78B$119.60B
Revenue (TTM)$3.14B$26.26B$9.26B$37.70B
Net Income (TTM)$-1.75B$8.41B$922M$1.37B
Gross Margin73.8%57.4%37.2%20.6%
Operating Margin-41.4%46.1%24.0%9.0%
Forward P/E21.6x20.1x44.9x
Total Debt$5.16B$51.95B$15.96B$26.61B
Cash & Equiv.$83M$1.08B$1.33B$3.22B

FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FUN
MCD
QSR
SBUX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Six Flags Entertain… (FUN)10061.9-38.1%
McDonald's Corporat… (MCD)100152.5+52.5%
Restaurant Brands I… (QSR)100141.4+41.4%
Starbucks Corporati… (SBUX)100136.5+36.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MCD leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Restaurant Brands International Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. FUN and SBUX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FUN
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
The Growth Play

FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
  • 50.6% revenue growth vs MCD's 1.7%
Best for: growth exposure
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
The Income Pick

MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 2.4%
  • 161.9% 10Y total return vs QSR's 135.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.11, current ratio 1.19x
  • PEG 2.83 vs QSR's 3.32
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
The Value Play

QSR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (20.1x vs 44.9x)
  • 2.8% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.4%
Best for: value and dividends
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
The Momentum Pick

SBUX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +31.5% vs FUN's -49.3%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUN logoFUN50.6% revenue growth vs MCD's 1.7%
ValueQSR logoQSRLower P/E (20.1x vs 44.9x)
Quality / MarginsMCD logoMCD32.0% margin vs FUN's -55.7%
Stability / SafetyMCD logoMCDBeta 0.11 vs FUN's 1.83
DividendsQSR logoQSR2.8% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.4%
Momentum (1Y)SBUX logoSBUX+31.5% vs FUN's -49.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MCD logoMCD13.9% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 19.3% vs 5.1%

FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FUNSix Flags Entertainment Corporation
FY 2024
Admission
51.8%$1.4B
Food, Merchandise and Gaming
33.2%$898M
Accommodations, Extra-Charge Products And Other
15.0%$407M
MCDMcDonald's Corporation
FY 2024
High-Growth Markets
48.7%$12.6B
UNITED STATES
41.0%$10.6B
International Developmental Licensed Markets and Corporate
10.3%$2.7B
QSRRestaurant Brands International Inc.
FY 2024
Tim Hortons
47.4%$4.0B
Burger King
17.0%$1.4B
Advertising
13.1%$1.1B
International Segment
11.0%$935M
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
9.0%$768M
Firehouse Subs
2.5%$214M
SBUXStarbucks Corporation
FY 2025
Beverage Member
60.6%$22.5B
Other Products Member
20.4%$7.6B
Food Member
19.0%$7.0B

FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMCDLAGGINGSBUX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MCD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 12.0x FUN's $3.1B. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 32.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%. On growth, QSR holds the edge at +6.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.1B$26.3B$9.3B$37.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$828M$14.3B$2.5B$5.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1.7B$8.4B$922M$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$169M$7.4B$1.4B$2.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+73.8%+57.4%+37.2%+20.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-41.4%+46.1%+24.0%+9.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-55.7%+32.0%+10.0%+3.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.4%+28.1%+14.7%+6.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.3%+3.0%+6.9%+5.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.7%+1.6%+21.8%-62.3%
MCD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FUN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 25.0x trailing earnings, MCD trades at a 61% valuation discount to SBUX's 64.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCD offers better value at 3.27x vs QSR's 4.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$1.8B$203.1B$26.8B$119.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.9B$253.9B$41.4B$143.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.88x25.04x25.69x64.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.62x20.12x44.92x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.27x4.24x4.13x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.00x18.39x15.43x27.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.68x7.84x3.19x3.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.80x7.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF34.91x30.44x20.57x48.98x
FUN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

QSR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. FUN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QSR's 3.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCD scores 7/9 vs SBUX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.0%+17.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-22.1%+13.9%+3.6%+4.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.1%+19.3%+9.7%+17.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.2%+23.3%+11.1%+16.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94754
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.26x3.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.1B$50.9B$14.6B$23.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$83M$1.1B$1.3B$3.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.2B$51.9B$16.0B$26.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.53x7.88x3.61x6.03x
MCD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

QSR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in QSR five years ago would be worth $13,489 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,223 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, SBUX leads with a +31.5% total return vs FUN's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QSR at 7.4% vs FUN's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.0%-5.4%+21.4%+25.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-49.3%-7.4%+26.2%+31.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.9%+3.1%+24.0%+4.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.8%+34.8%+34.9%+2.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-41.0%+161.9%+135.6%+117.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-21.6%+1.0%+7.4%+1.5%
QSR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QSR currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.83x0.11x0.39x0.99x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$38.47$341.75$81.91$107.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.51$283.02$61.33$77.99
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+47.1%+83.4%+99.7%+97.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.830.060.266.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M2.9M3.1M7.6M
Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FUN as "Buy", MCD as "Buy", QSR as "Buy", SBUX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.2% upside for FUN (target: $23) vs 2.5% for QSR (target: $84). For income investors, QSR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.77% vs FUN's 1.69%.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…MCD logoMCDMcDonald's Corpor…QSR logoQSRRestaurant Brands…SBUX logoSBUXStarbucks Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.88$352.25$83.71$108.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts29624459
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+2.4%+2.8%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0261316
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.31$6.75$2.27$2.43
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallMcDonald's Corporation (MCD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). McDonald's Corporation (MCD) offers the better valuation at 25. 0x trailing P/E (21. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?

On trailing P/E, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the cheapest at 25.

0x versus Starbucks Corporation at 64. 4x. On forward P/E, Restaurant Brands International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: McDonald's Corporation wins at 2. 83x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. 's 3. 32x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?

Over the past 5 years, Restaurant Brands International Inc.

(QSR) delivered a total return of +34. 9%, compared to -57. 8% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCD returned +161. 9% versus FUN's -37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

11β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 1538% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Restaurant Brands International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.

6% versus 1. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McDonald's Corporation grew EPS -1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?

McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

7% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 45. 2% versus 9. 6% for SBUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUN leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 83x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. 's 3. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 9x for Starbucks Corporation — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUN: 26. 2% to $22. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 7% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN).

09

Is FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

11), 2. 4% yield, +161. 9% 10Y return). Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +161. 9%, FUN: -37. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FUN and MCD and QSR and SBUX?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MCD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; QSR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SBUX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FUN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 44%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCD

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 19%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QSR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBUX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FUN and MCD and QSR and SBUX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FUN: -2.3% · MCD: 3.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.