Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $1.84B | $203.09B | $26.78B | $119.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.14B | $26.26B | $9.26B | $37.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.75B | $8.41B | $922M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | 73.8% | 57.4% | 37.2% | 20.6% |
| Operating Margin | -41.4% | 46.1% | 24.0% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.6x | 20.1x | 44.9x |
| Total Debt | $5.16B | $51.95B | $15.96B | $26.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $1.08B | $1.33B | $3.22B |
FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
| McDonald's Corporat… (MCD) | 100 | 152.5 | +52.5% |
| Restaurant Brands I… (QSR) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| Starbucks Corporati… (SBUX) | 100 | 136.5 | +36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
- 50.6% revenue growth vs MCD's 1.7%
MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 2.4%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs QSR's 135.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, current ratio 1.19x
- PEG 2.83 vs QSR's 3.32
QSR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (20.1x vs 44.9x)
- 2.8% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.4%
SBUX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +31.5% vs FUN's -49.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.6% revenue growth vs MCD's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 44.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.0% margin vs FUN's -55.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs FUN's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.5% vs FUN's -49.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.9% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 19.3% vs 5.1% |
FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories
FUN leads 1 • QSR leads 1 • SBUX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 12.0x FUN's $3.1B. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 32.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%. On growth, QSR holds the edge at +6.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $26.3B | $9.3B | $37.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$828M | $14.3B | $2.5B | $5.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.7B | $8.4B | $922M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$169M | $7.4B | $1.4B | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.8% | +57.4% | +37.2% | +20.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.4% | +46.1% | +24.0% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -55.7% | +32.0% | +10.0% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +28.1% | +14.7% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +3.0% | +6.9% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.7% | +1.6% | +21.8% | -62.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FUN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.0x trailing earnings, MCD trades at a 61% valuation discount to SBUX's 64.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCD offers better value at 3.27x vs QSR's 4.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $203.1B | $26.8B | $119.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $253.9B | $41.4B | $143.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.88x | 25.04x | 25.69x | 64.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.62x | 20.12x | 44.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.27x | 4.24x | 4.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.00x | 18.39x | 15.43x | 27.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.68x | 7.84x | 3.19x | 3.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | — | 7.66x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.91x | 30.44x | 20.57x | 48.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QSR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. FUN carries lower financial leverage with a 2.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QSR's 3.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCD scores 7/9 vs SBUX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.0% | — | +17.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.1% | +13.9% | +3.6% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +19.3% | +9.7% | +17.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +23.3% | +11.1% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.26x | — | 3.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.1B | $50.9B | $14.6B | $23.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $1.1B | $1.3B | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $51.9B | $16.0B | $26.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.53x | 7.88x | 3.61x | 6.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QSR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QSR five years ago would be worth $13,489 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,223 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, SBUX leads with a +31.5% total return vs FUN's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QSR at 7.4% vs FUN's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.0% | -5.4% | +21.4% | +25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.3% | -7.4% | +26.2% | +31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | +3.1% | +24.0% | +4.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.8% | +34.8% | +34.9% | +2.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.0% | +161.9% | +135.6% | +117.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.6% | +1.0% | +7.4% | +1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QSR currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 0.11x | 0.39x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.47 | $341.75 | $81.91 | $107.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.51 | $283.02 | $61.33 | $77.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.1% | +83.4% | +99.7% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 30.0 | 60.2 | 66.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.9M | 3.1M | 7.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUN as "Buy", MCD as "Buy", QSR as "Buy", SBUX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.2% upside for FUN (target: $23) vs 2.5% for QSR (target: $84). For income investors, QSR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.77% vs FUN's 1.69%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.88 | $352.25 | $83.71 | $108.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 62 | 44 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +2.4% | +2.8% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 | 13 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.31 | $6.75 | $2.27 | $2.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FUN vs MCD vs QSR vs SBUX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). McDonald's Corporation (MCD) offers the better valuation at 25. 0x trailing P/E (21. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?
On trailing P/E, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the cheapest at 25.
0x versus Starbucks Corporation at 64. 4x. On forward P/E, Restaurant Brands International Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: McDonald's Corporation wins at 2. 83x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. 's 3. 32x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?
Over the past 5 years, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) delivered a total return of +34. 9%, compared to -57. 8% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCD returned +161. 9% versus FUN's -37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 1538% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Restaurant Brands International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.
6% versus 1. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McDonald's Corporation grew EPS -1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?
McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 45. 2% versus 9. 6% for SBUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUN leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 83x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. 's 3. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 9x for Starbucks Corporation — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUN: 26. 2% to $22. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 7% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN).
09Is FUN or MCD or QSR or SBUX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11), 2. 4% yield, +161. 9% 10Y return). Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +161. 9%, FUN: -37. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUN and MCD and QSR and SBUX?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MCD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; QSR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SBUX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.