Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Formula One Group (FWONK) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NFLX | 15.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% |
| Value | NFLX | Lower P/E (30.8x vs 52.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | FWONK | 43.8% net margin vs NFLX's 24.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FWONK | Beta 0.51 vs NFLX's 0.76 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NFLX | -1.9% vs FWONK's -5.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FWONK | 42.6% ROA vs NFLX's 19.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Formula One Group is the commercial rights holder for the global Formula 1 motorsport championship. It generates revenue primarily from race promotion fees (about 30%), media rights sales (about 35%), and sponsorship deals (about 20%), with the remainder from hospitality and other sources. Its key moat is the exclusive, long-term commercial rights to the world's premier motorsport series — a globally recognized brand with high barriers to entry.
Netflix is a global streaming entertainment service that offers original and licensed TV shows, movies, and documentaries. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees — with three pricing tiers — and earns additional income from licensing its original content to other platforms. Its key advantage is its massive scale and data-driven content creation, which allows it to invest billions in programming that attracts and retains subscribers worldwide.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NFLX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). FWONK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 44.1x FWONK's $1.0B. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFLX's 24.3%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $231M | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $449M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $279M | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.4B | $407.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.4B | $413.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 38.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.13x | 30.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 9.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 15.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.48x | 43.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.6% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.35x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth $20,766 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,479 for NFLX. Over the past 12 months, NFLX leads with a -1.9% total return vs FWONK's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 44.0% vs FWONK's 11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +5.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.0% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.1% | +198.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.7% | +74.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +269.5% | +930.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.6% | +44.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFLX's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FWONK currently trades 83.8% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.36 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.26 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 38.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FWONK as "Buy" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.2% upside for FWONK (target: $119) vs 21.8% for NFLX (target: $117).
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $119.25 | $117.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 230.02 | +130.0% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 217.16 | +117.2% |
Formula One Group (FWONK) returned +108% over 5 years vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)'s +75%. A $10,000 investment in FWONK 5 years ago would be worth $20,766 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | $8.8B | $45.2B | +411.7% |
Formula One Group's revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a 0.0% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s revenue grew from $8.8B (2016) to $45.2B (2025) — a 19.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 14.3% | -0.8% | -105.7% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 2.1% | 24.3% | +1049.7% |
Netflix, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to 24% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 27.8 | 101.8 | +266.2% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 153.6 | 37.1 | -75.8% |
Formula One Group has traded in a 27x–102x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~102x. Netflix, Inc. has traded in a 30x–154x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~38x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 1.02 | 0 | -100.0% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 0.04 | 2.53 | +5783.7% |
Formula One Group's EPS grew from $1.02 (2016) to $0.00 (2025) — a -100% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.04 (2016) to $2.53 (2025) — a 57% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Formula One Group generated $908M FCF in 2025 (+96% vs 2021). Netflix, Inc. generated $9B FCF in 2025 (+7269% vs 2021).
FWONK vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FWONK or NFLX a better buy right now?
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 38.0x trailing P/E (30.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Formula One Group (FWONK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FWONK or NFLX?
On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 30.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FWONK or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Formula One Group (FWONK) delivered a total return of +107.7%, compared to +74.8% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +930.4% versus FWONK's +269.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FWONK or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.51β versus Netflix, Inc.'s 0.76β — meaning NFLX is approximately 50% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — FWONK or NFLX?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.8% net margin versus 24.3% for Netflix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29.5% versus -3.4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FWONK or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 30.8x forward P/E versus 52.1x for Formula One Group — 21.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWONK: 30.2% to $119.25.
07Which pays a better dividend — FWONK or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FWONK or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.76), +930.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +930.4%, FWONK: +269.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FWONK and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.