Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FWONK vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
FWONK vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $19.76B | $374.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $449M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | -18.4% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.4% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 54.5x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $9.03B |
FWONK vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 260.2 | +160.2% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FWONK vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FWONK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35
- Beta 0.35
NFLX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs FWONK's 381.5%
- 15.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 54.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs NFLX's 24.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs NFLX's 0.39 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -3.0% vs NFLX's -22.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.6% ROA vs NFLX's 19.8% |
FWONK vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FWONK vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FWONK and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 44.1x FWONK's $1.0B. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NFLX's 24.3%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $231M | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $449M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $279M | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FWONK and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.8B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.7B | $379.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 54.53x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.76x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FWONK and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.6% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.35x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth $20,034 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,668 for NFLX. Over the past 12 months, FWONK leads with a -3.0% total return vs NFLX's -22.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs FWONK's 7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.6% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.0% | -22.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.8% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.3% | +76.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +381.5% | +872.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.4% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
FWONK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFLX's 0.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FWONK currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.36 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.15 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.1% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 34.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 44.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FWONK as "Buy" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 31.2% for FWONK (target: $116).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.33 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Total Returns). FWONK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
FWONK vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FWONK or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Formula One Group (FWONK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FWONK or NFLX?
On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FWONK or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Formula One Group (FWONK) delivered a total return of +100.
3%, compared to +76. 7% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +872. 1% versus FWONK's +381. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FWONK or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 39β — meaning NFLX is approximately 10% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — FWONK or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Formula One Group grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FWONK or NFLX?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
8% net margin versus 24. 3% for Netflix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -3. 4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FWONK or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 54. 5x for Formula One Group — 29. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 7% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — FWONK or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FWONK or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +872. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +872. 1%, FWONK: +381. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FWONK and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FWONK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.