Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FWONK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
FWONK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $20.83B | $374.00B | $192.60B | $67.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.02B | $45.18B | $97.26B | $37.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $449M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $-2.15B |
| Gross Margin | -18.4% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.4% | 29.5% | 15.5% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | 57.5x | 24.8x | 16.5x | 93.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $14.46B | $44.88B | $32.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $9.03B | $5.70B | $4.57B |
FWONK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 274.4 | +174.4% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FWONK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FWONK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35
- 43.8% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
- Beta 0.35 vs WBD's 0.90
- 42.6% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%
NFLX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs FWONK's 418.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0%
DIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth 151.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 93.5x)
- 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 93.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs WBD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.6% ROA vs WBD's -2.2% |
FWONK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FWONK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
DIS leads 1 • FWONK leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FWONK and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 95.0x FWONK's $1.0B. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $45.2B | $97.3B | $37.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $231M | $30.1B | $20.5B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $449M | $11.0B | $11.2B | -$2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $279M | $9.5B | $7.1B | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +41.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +29.5% | +15.5% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +24.3% | +11.5% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +17.6% | +6.5% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +31.1% | -29.8% | -5.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 83% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIS's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WBD's 13.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.8B | $374.0B | $192.6B | $68.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.8B | $379.4B | $231.8B | $96.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 34.89x | 15.87x | 93.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.49x | 24.80x | 16.53x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x | 12.10x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.28x | 2.04x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 14.32x | 1.72x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.94x | 39.53x | 19.11x | 22.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WBD's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +41.3% | +9.8% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.6% | +19.8% | +5.6% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% | +6.9% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $5.4B | $39.2B | $28.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $9.0B | $5.7B | $4.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $14.5B | $44.9B | $32.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.35x | 17.33x | 9.95x | 3.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FWONK five years ago would be worth $21,768 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,017 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs DIS's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.7% | -3.0% | -2.8% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.1% | -23.6% | +7.7% | +216.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.5% | +166.5% | +8.0% | +101.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.7% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +418.1% | +875.3% | +11.8% | -3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.3% | +38.6% | +2.6% | +26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FWONK and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.36 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $30.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.15 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 44.0M | 9.1M | 22.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FWONK as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", WBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 10.4% for WBD (target: $30). DIS is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.33 | $116.29 | $139.50 | $29.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 99 | 63 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FWONK vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FWONK or NFLX or DIS or WBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Formula One Group (FWONK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FWONK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.
9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FWONK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
Over the past 5 years, Formula One Group (FWONK) delivered a total return of +117.
7%, compared to -39. 8% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus WBD's -3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FWONK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 155% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 88% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FWONK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FWONK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
8% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -3. 4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FWONK or NFLX or DIS or WBD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Formula One Group — 41. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — FWONK or NFLX or DIS or WBD?
In this comparison, DIS (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. FWONK, NFLX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FWONK or NFLX or DIS or WBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, WBD: -3. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FWONK and NFLX and DIS and WBD?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FWONK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DIS pays a dividend while FWONK, NFLX, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.