Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GATX vs UNP vs CSX vs NSC vs WAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Railroads
Railroads
Railroads
Railroads
GATX vs UNP vs CSX vs NSC vs WAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Railroads | Railroads | Railroads | Railroads |
| Market Cap | $6.62B | $157.12B | $83.30B | $70.10B | $45.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.90B | $18.49B | $14.15B | $12.19B | $11.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $340M | $5.51B | $3.05B | $2.67B | $1.21B |
| Gross Margin | 33.6% | 45.8% | 37.5% | 51.1% | 33.8% |
| Operating Margin | 25.2% | 40.3% | 33.4% | 32.4% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 18.6x | 21.0x | 23.5x | 25.8x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $12.81B | $31.81B | $19.35B | $17.09B | $5.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.98B | $1.27B | $670M | $1.53B | $789M |
GATX vs UNP vs CSX vs NSC vs WAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GATX Corporation (GATX) | 100 | 297.1 | +197.1% |
| Union Pacific Corpo… (UNP) | 100 | 155.8 | +55.8% |
| CSX Corporation (CSX) | 100 | 187.9 | +87.9% |
| Norfolk Southern Co… (NSC) | 100 | 175.1 | +75.1% |
| Westinghouse Air Br… (WAB) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GATX vs UNP vs CSX vs NSC vs WAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GATX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.8%, EPS growth 17.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 9.8% revenue growth vs CSX's -3.1%
- Lower P/E (18.6x vs 25.8x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.53
UNP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.63, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.91x
- 29.8% margin vs WAB's 10.5%
- 2.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NSC's 1.7%
- 10.7% ROA vs GATX's 2.2%, ROIC 15.2% vs 3.7%
CSX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 463.6% 10Y total return vs GATX's 366.9%
- +56.6% vs UNP's +24.6%
NSC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.62 vs WAB's 1.11
WAB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.97 vs CSX's 4.60
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.8% revenue growth vs CSX's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.6x vs 25.8x), PEG 1.10 vs 2.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.8% margin vs WAB's 10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs WAB's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NSC's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.6% vs UNP's +24.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.7% ROA vs GATX's 2.2%, ROIC 15.2% vs 3.7% |
GATX vs UNP vs CSX vs NSC vs WAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GATX vs UNP vs CSX vs NSC vs WAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GATX leads in 1 of 6 categories
UNP leads 1 • CSX leads 0 • NSC leads 0 • WAB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — UNP and NSC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UNP is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.5B annually — 9.7x GATX's $1.9B. UNP is the more profitable business, keeping 29.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAB's 10.5%. On growth, GATX holds the edge at +38.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $18.5B | $14.2B | $12.2B | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $823M | $9.3B | $6.4B | $5.0B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $340M | $5.5B | $3.0B | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$497M | $4.2B | $4.1B | $4.2B | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +45.8% | +37.5% | +51.1% | +33.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +40.3% | +33.4% | +32.4% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +29.8% | +21.6% | +21.9% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.1% | +22.7% | +29.2% | +34.5% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.4% | -99.9% | +1.7% | +0.2% | +13.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +6.2% | +26.5% | -26.6% | +12.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GATX leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, GATX trades at a 47% valuation discount to WAB's 38.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GATX offers better value at 1.21x vs CSX's 5.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.6B | $157.1B | $83.3B | $70.1B | $45.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.4B | $187.7B | $102.0B | $85.7B | $49.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.44x | 22.11x | 29.11x | 24.48x | 38.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.56x | 21.03x | 23.54x | 25.81x | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.21x | 2.54x | 5.69x | 2.40x | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.64x | 15.24x | 17.59x | 15.86x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.81x | 6.41x | 5.91x | 5.76x | 4.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.84x | 8.51x | 6.35x | 4.51x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 28.57x | 48.69x | 32.50x | 30.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UNP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UNP delivers a 42.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $11 for GATX. WAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GATX's 3.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UNP scores 8/9 vs WAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +42.4% | +23.5% | +17.4% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +10.7% | +7.0% | +6.0% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +15.2% | +10.9% | +9.8% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +15.5% | +11.3% | +9.8% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.52x | 1.72x | 1.47x | 1.10x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.8B | $30.5B | $18.7B | $15.6B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $1.3B | $670M | $1.5B | $789M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.8B | $31.8B | $19.4B | $17.1B | $5.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.04x | 8.13x | 5.66x | 4.15x | 7.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CSX and WAB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAB five years ago would be worth $33,309 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,648 for NSC. Over the past 12 months, CSX leads with a +56.6% total return vs UNP's +24.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAB at 39.3% vs UNP's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.5% | +14.7% | +24.0% | +9.4% | +23.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.8% | +24.6% | +56.6% | +41.7% | +39.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.3% | +40.4% | +45.2% | +58.6% | +170.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.3% | +27.1% | +36.9% | +16.5% | +233.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +366.9% | +261.7% | +463.6% | +301.2% | +247.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.6% | +12.0% | +13.2% | +16.6% | +39.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UNP and NSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NSC is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UNP currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs GATX's 90.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.63x | 0.76x | 0.62x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $205.56 | $273.17 | $46.55 | $323.37 | $275.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $143.46 | $210.84 | $28.33 | $220.02 | $184.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.7% | +96.9% | +96.3% | +96.5% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 58.2 | 55.7 | 57.6 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 188K | 2.7M | 12.0M | 1.1M | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UNP and NSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GATX as "Buy", UNP as "Buy", CSX as "Buy", NSC as "Hold", WAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.0% upside for GATX (target: $220) vs -3.9% for CSX (target: $43). For income investors, UNP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.06% vs WAB's 0.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $220.00 | $287.30 | $43.08 | $329.86 | $291.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 47 | 46 | 48 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +2.1% | +1.2% | +1.7% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 19 | 9 | 21 | 24 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.51 | $5.45 | $0.52 | $5.40 | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +1.7% | +1.7% | +0.8% | +0.5% |
GATX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). UNP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
GATX vs UNP vs CSX vs NSC vs WAB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GATX or UNP or CSX or NSC or WAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GATX Corporation (GATX) is the stronger pick with 9.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for CSX Corporation (CSX). GATX Corporation (GATX) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (18. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GATX Corporation (GATX) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GATX or UNP or CSX or NSC or WAB?
On trailing P/E, GATX Corporation (GATX) is the cheapest at 20.
4x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation at 38. 9x. On forward P/E, GATX Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation wins at 0. 97x versus CSX Corporation's 4. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GATX or UNP or CSX or NSC or WAB?
Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +233.
1%, compared to +16. 5% for Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSX returned +463. 6% versus WAB's +247. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GATX or UNP or CSX or NSC or WAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
62β versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning WAB is approximately 79% more volatile than NSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 4% for GATX Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GATX or UNP or CSX or NSC or WAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GATX Corporation (GATX) is pulling ahead at 9.
8% versus -3. 1% for CSX Corporation (CSX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GATX Corporation grew EPS 17. 2% year-over-year, compared to -14. 0% for CSX Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GATX leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GATX or UNP or CSX or NSC or WAB?
Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus 10. 5% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UNP leads at 40. 1% versus 16. 7% for WAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UNP leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GATX or UNP or CSX or NSC or WAB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus CSX Corporation's 4. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, GATX Corporation (GATX) trades at 18. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for Norfolk Southern Corporation — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GATX: 18. 0% to $220. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GATX or UNP or CSX or NSC or WAB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 4% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB).
09Is GATX or UNP or CSX or NSC or WAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
62), 1. 7% yield, +301. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NSC: +301. 2%, WAB: +247. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GATX and UNP and CSX and NSC and WAB?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
GATX, UNP, CSX, NSC pay a dividend while WAB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.