Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GCT vs EBAY vs AMZN vs W vs SHOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
GCT vs EBAY vs AMZN vs W vs SHOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $48.63B | $2.92T | $8.71B | $145.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.38B | $11.60B | $742.78B | $12.66B | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $148M | $2.04B | $90.80B | $-305M | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 72.0% | 50.6% | 30.1% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 19.6% | 11.5% | 1.1% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 17.4x | 34.8x | 23.6x | 60.9x |
| Total Debt | $469M | $7.38B | $152.99B | $4.07B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $380M | $1.87B | $86.81B | $1.48B | $1.53B |
GCT vs EBAY vs AMZN vs W vs SHOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GigaCloud Technolog… (GCT) | 100 | 292.4 | +192.4% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 241.2 | +141.2% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 213.9 | +113.9% |
| Wayfair Inc. (W) | 100 | 125.6 | +25.6% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 353.0 | +253.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GCT vs EBAY vs AMZN vs W vs SHOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GCT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 60.9x)
- +209.5% vs SHOP's +18.2%
- 12.8% ROA vs W's -9.6%
EBAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 1.10x
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
- 17.6% margin vs W's -2.4%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- PEG 1.24 vs SHOP's 2.08
Among these 5 stocks, W doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SHOP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs W's 5.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs W's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 60.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs W's -2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs W's 2.85 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.5% vs SHOP's +18.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs W's -9.6% |
GCT vs EBAY vs AMZN vs W vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GCT vs EBAY vs AMZN vs W vs SHOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GCT leads in 3 of 6 categories
EBAY leads 2 • AMZN leads 0 • W leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 539.2x GCT's $1.4B. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to W's -2.4%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $11.6B | $742.8B | $12.7B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $165M | $2.6B | $155.9B | $428M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $148M | $2.0B | $90.8B | -$305M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $150M | $1.7B | -$2.5B | $456M | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +72.0% | +50.6% | +30.1% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +19.6% | +11.5% | +1.1% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +17.6% | +12.2% | -2.4% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +14.5% | -0.3% | +3.6% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.2% | +19.5% | +16.6% | +7.4% | +34.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.9% | +5.7% | +74.8% | +10.1% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GCT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, GCT trades at a 90% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $48.6B | $2.92T | $8.7B | $145.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $54.1B | $2.98T | $11.3B | $143.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.93x | 24.52x | 37.82x | -27.36x | 118.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.89x | 17.40x | 34.77x | 23.63x | 60.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.35x | — | 4.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.24x | 21.03x | 20.47x | 35.11x | 95.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 4.38x | 4.07x | 0.70x | 12.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.37x | 10.61x | 7.14x | — | 10.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.94x | 29.28x | 378.98x | 18.78x | 72.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GCT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $11 for SHOP. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), W scores 7/9 vs GCT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.5% | +44.1% | +23.3% | — | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +11.5% | +11.5% | -9.6% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | +16.8% | +14.7% | — | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.4% | +17.4% | +15.3% | +1.4% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 1.60x | 0.37x | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $90M | $5.5B | $66.2B | $2.6B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $380M | $1.9B | $86.8B | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $469M | $7.4B | $153.0B | $4.1B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 417.84x | 10.52x | 39.96x | -0.63x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GCT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GCT five years ago would be worth $27,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,167 for W. Over the past 12 months, GCT leads with a +209.5% total return vs SHOP's +18.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GCT at 101.2% vs W's 18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.5% | +22.6% | +19.7% | -37.9% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +209.5% | +54.2% | +43.7% | +117.4% | +18.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +714.4% | +137.4% | +156.2% | +65.6% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.0% | +86.3% | +64.8% | -78.3% | +0.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.0% | +369.5% | +697.8% | +67.0% | +4123.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +101.2% | +33.4% | +36.8% | +18.3% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EBAY and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than W's 2.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs W's 55.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.41x | 0.73x | 1.51x | 2.85x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.86 | $111.38 | $278.56 | $119.98 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.57 | $67.87 | $185.01 | $29.75 | $88.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.6% | +95.5% | +97.3% | +55.2% | +61.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 63.1 | 81.1 | 38.6 | 34.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 752K | 5.4M | 45.5M | 3.6M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
EBAY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GCT as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy", W as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.2% upside for W (target: $100) vs -24.1% for GCT (target: $33). EBAY is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.50 | $109.67 | $306.77 | $100.07 | $164.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 68 | 94 | 57 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GCT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). EBAY leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
GCT vs EBAY vs AMZN vs W vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GCT or EBAY or AMZN or W or SHOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Wayfair Inc. (W). GigaCloud Technology Inc. (GCT) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GigaCloud Technology Inc. (GCT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GCT or EBAY or AMZN or W or SHOP?
On trailing P/E, GigaCloud Technology Inc.
(GCT) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, GigaCloud Technology Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GCT or EBAY or AMZN or W or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, GigaCloud Technology Inc.
(GCT) delivered a total return of +173. 0%, compared to -78. 3% for Wayfair Inc. (W). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus W's +67. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GCT or EBAY or AMZN or W or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Wayfair Inc. 's 2. 85β — meaning W is approximately 288% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GCT or EBAY or AMZN or W or SHOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus 5. 1% for Wayfair Inc. (W). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wayfair Inc. grew EPS 39. 5% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GCT leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GCT or EBAY or AMZN or W or SHOP?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -2. 5% for Wayfair Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus 0. 1% for W. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GCT or EBAY or AMZN or W or SHOP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, GigaCloud Technology Inc. (GCT) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 50. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for W: 51. 2% to $100. 07.
08Which pays a better dividend — GCT or EBAY or AMZN or W or SHOP?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. GCT, AMZN, W, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GCT or EBAY or AMZN or W or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GCT and EBAY and AMZN and W and SHOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (GCT (Technology) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and W (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GCT is a small-cap deep-value stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; W is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. EBAY pays a dividend while GCT, AMZN, W, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.