Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GSIW
Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$457M
5Y Perf.-98.1%
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$590M
5Y Perf.+21.1%
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$50.59B
5Y Perf.+53.1%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$88.45B
5Y Perf.+21.6%

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GSIW logoGSIW
PFIS logoPFIS
NDAQ logoNDAQ
ICE logoICE
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$457M$590M$50.59B$88.45B
Revenue (TTM)$5M$281M$8.22B$12.64B
Net Income (TTM)$13M$59M$1.91B$3.30B
Gross Margin4.7%66.6%47.9%61.9%
Operating Margin-80.0%25.7%28.4%38.7%
Forward P/E9.0x22.6x19.5x
Total Debt$199K$258M$9.93B$20.28B
Cash & Equiv.$625K$58M$814M$837M

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GSIW
PFIS
NDAQ
ICE
StockDec 23May 26Return
Garden Stage Limite… (GSIW)1001.9-98.1%
Peoples Financial S… (PFIS)100121.1+21.1%
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ)100153.1+53.1%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100121.6+21.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PFIS leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. Nasdaq, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GSIW and ICE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GSIW
Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares
The Banking Pick

GSIW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 296.0% NII/revenue growth vs ICE's 7.5%
Best for: growth
PFIS
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
The Banking Pick

PFIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 493.9%
  • PEG 1.13 vs ICE's 2.19
  • Beta 0.82, yield 4.1%, current ratio 8.76x
  • NIM 3.1% vs GSIW's 0.4%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
The Banking Pick

NDAQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 347.6% 10Y total return vs ICE's 225.3%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
  • Beta 0.33 vs GSIW's 2.04
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGSIW logoGSIW296.0% NII/revenue growth vs ICE's 7.5%
ValuePFIS logoPFISLower P/E (9.0x vs 19.5x), PEG 1.13 vs 2.19
Quality / MarginsNDAQ logoNDAQEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.33 vs GSIW's 2.04
DividendsPFIS logoPFIS4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PFIS logoPFIS+34.0% vs GSIW's -64.8%
Efficiency (ROA)NDAQ logoNDAQEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs GSIW's 0.8%

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GSIWGarden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

PFISPeoples Financial Services Corp.
FY 2025
Bank Servicing
67.6%$14M
Asset Management
14.7%$3M
Commission And Fees On Fiduciary Activities
11.3%$2M
Credit Card
6.4%$1M
NDAQNasdaq, Inc.
FY 2025
Market Services
51.4%$4.2B
Capital Access Platforms
26.1%$2.1B
Market Technology
22.6%$1.9B
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPFISLAGGINGNDAQ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 2339.1x GSIW's $5M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSIW's -79.9%.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$281M$8.2B$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M$80M$3.1B$6.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$13M$59M$1.9B$3.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$13M$43M$2.0B$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+4.7%+66.6%+47.9%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-80.0%+25.7%+28.4%+38.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-79.9%+21.1%+21.8%+26.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-25.3%+15.4%+24.2%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.7%+95.1%+33.8%+23.1%
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFIS leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.0x trailing earnings, PFIS trades at a 65% valuation discount to NDAQ's 28.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFIS offers better value at 1.25x vs ICE's 3.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Market CapShares × price$457M$590M$50.6B$88.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$456M$790M$59.7B$107.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-104.39x10.03x28.80x27.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.02x22.65x19.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.25x2.70x3.05x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.94x20.14x16.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue84.53x2.10x6.16x7.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share68.14x1.14x4.19x3.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.61x25.44x20.62x
PFIS leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GSIW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

GSIW delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for ICE. GSIW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NDAQ's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NDAQ scores 9/9 vs GSIW's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.9%+11.8%+15.9%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.6%+1.2%+6.4%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.3%+7.7%+8.1%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-53.1%+2.4%+10.2%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95699
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.50x0.81x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$425,481$200M$9.1B$19.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$624,583$58M$814M$837M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$199,102$258M$9.9B$20.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.77x14.11x6.53x
GSIW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PFIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NDAQ five years ago would be worth $17,036 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $143 for GSIW. Over the past 12 months, PFIS leads with a +34.0% total return vs GSIW's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFIS at 19.5% vs GSIW's -75.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.1%+23.7%-7.6%-2.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-64.8%+34.0%+14.6%-10.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+70.7%+67.4%+50.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+57.5%+70.4%+43.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+93.9%+347.6%+225.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-75.7%+19.5%+18.7%+14.7%
PFIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PFIS and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSIW's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFIS currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs GSIW's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.04x0.82x0.78x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$358.00$59.86$101.79$189.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.15$43.64$77.09$143.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.2%+98.5%+87.4%+82.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.460.752.638.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded62K53K3.3M3.0M
Evenly matched — PFIS and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PFIS and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PFIS as "Hold", NDAQ as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.8% upside for NDAQ (target: $115) vs -5.0% for PFIS (target: $56). For income investors, PFIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.15% vs NDAQ's 1.17%.

MetricGSIW logoGSIWGarden Stage Limi…PFIS logoPFISPeoples Financial…NDAQ logoNDAQNasdaq, Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$56.00$114.60$195.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts13636
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.1%+1.2%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises191314
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.45$1.04$1.93
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.2%+1.6%
Evenly matched — PFIS and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PFIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). ICE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallPeoples Financial Services … (PFIS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GSIW vs PFIS vs NDAQ vs ICE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is the stronger pick with 296.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE?

On trailing P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp.

(PFIS) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Nasdaq, Inc. at 28. 8x. On forward P/E, Peoples Financial Services Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Peoples Financial Services Corp. wins at 1. 13x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE?

Over the past 5 years, Nasdaq, Inc.

(NDAQ) delivered a total return of +70. 4%, compared to -98. 6% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDAQ returned +347. 6% versus GSIW's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares's 2. 04β — meaning GSIW is approximately 522% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 81% for Nasdaq, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) is pulling ahead at 296.

0% versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peoples Financial Services Corp. grew EPS 493. 9% year-over-year, compared to 3. 4% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE?

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus -79. 9% for Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus -80. 0% for GSIW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFIS leads at 66. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 19x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 6x for Nasdaq, Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDAQ: 28. 8% to $114. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE?

In this comparison, PFIS (4.

1% yield), ICE (1. 2% yield), NDAQ (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GSIW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GSIW or PFIS or NDAQ or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 2% yield, +225. 3% 10Y return). Garden Stage Limited Ordinary Shares (GSIW) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +225. 3%, GSIW: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GSIW and PFIS and NDAQ and ICE?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GSIW is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFIS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NDAQ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PFIS, NDAQ, ICE pay a dividend while GSIW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GSIW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 147%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFIS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NDAQ

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GSIW and PFIS and NDAQ and ICE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GSIW: 296.0% · PFIS: 22.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.