Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GUTS vs DNLI vs LLY vs PRAX vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
GUTS vs DNLI vs LLY vs PRAX vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $116M | $3.06B | $896.11B | $9.53B | $30.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $72.25B | $0.00 | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-97M | $-513M | $25.27B | $-327M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 83.5% | — | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 45.9% | — | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 26.3x | — | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $62M | $33M | $42.50B | $110K | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $82M | $205M | $7.16B | $357M | $1.98B |
GUTS vs DNLI vs LLY vs PRAX vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fractyl Health, Inc… (GUTS) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| Denali Therapeutics… (DNLI) | 100 | 99.2 | -0.8% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 100 | 125.8 | +25.8% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 705.5 | +605.5% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 72.3 | -27.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GUTS vs DNLI vs LLY vs PRAX vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GUTS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DNLI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 0.6%
- Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
- 12.0% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.6%
- 44.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 10.22x
- +7.7% vs GUTS's -54.3%
IQV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.34 vs LLY's 0.91
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.0% margin vs PRAX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs GUTS's 1.88, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs GUTS's -54.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs GUTS's -102.2%, ROIC 41.8% vs -11.2% |
GUTS vs DNLI vs LLY vs PRAX vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GUTS vs DNLI vs LLY vs PRAX vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories
IQV leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • GUTS leads 0 • DNLI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LLY and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $72.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IQV's 8.3%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $72.2B | $0 | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$96M | -$544M | $34.7B | -$357M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$97M | -$513M | $25.3B | -$327M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$91M | -$422M | $13.6B | -$283M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +83.5% | — | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +45.9% | — | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +35.0% | — | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +18.8% | — | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | +55.5% | — | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -9.0% | +169.9% | +2.7% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 45% valuation discount to LLY's 41.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs LLY's 1.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $116M | $3.1B | $896.1B | $9.5B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96M | $2.9B | $931.5B | $9.2B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.41x | -6.61x | 41.33x | -24.48x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 26.30x | — | 13.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.43x | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 29.80x | — | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 13.75x | — | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.05x | 3.40x | 32.10x | 8.46x | 4.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 99.88x | — | 14.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $-7 for GUTS. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GUTS's 6.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs PRAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.4% | -50.6% | +101.2% | -43.0% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -102.2% | -44.8% | +22.7% | -40.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.2% | -42.8% | +41.8% | -65.0% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -101.2% | -47.9% | +46.6% | -49.3% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.52x | 0.03x | 1.60x | 0.00x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | -$173M | $35.3B | -$357M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $82M | $205M | $7.2B | $357M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $62M | $33M | $42.5B | $110,000 | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 35.68x | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $49,927 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $587 for GUTS. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +767.1% total return vs GUTS's -54.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs GUTS's -61.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -66.5% | +20.6% | -12.0% | +15.2% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.3% | +36.0% | +27.0% | +767.1% | +16.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.1% | -26.1% | +123.0% | +1956.2% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.1% | -62.0% | +399.3% | -14.9% | -22.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.1% | -8.5% | +1202.6% | -20.9% | +166.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.1% | -9.6% | +30.6% | +174.0% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LLY and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GUTS's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs GUTS's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.78x | 0.65x | 1.40x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.03 | $23.77 | $1133.95 | $356.00 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.38 | $12.58 | $623.78 | $35.21 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.9% | +82.5% | +83.6% | +92.7% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.1 | 50.1 | 58.4 | 53.3 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 1.6M | 2.6M | 376K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
LLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GUTS as "Buy", DNLI as "Buy", LLY as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 562.5% upside for GUTS (target: $5) vs 25.2% for IQV (target: $224). LLY is the only dividend payer here at 0.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $33.33 | $1261.11 | $548.80 | $223.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 18 | 45 | 16 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 11 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GUTS vs DNLI vs LLY vs PRAX vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GUTS or DNLI or LLY or PRAX or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger pick with 44.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock (GUTS) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GUTS or DNLI or LLY or PRAX or IQV?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus Eli Lilly and Company at 41. 3x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 34x versus Eli Lilly and Company's 0. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GUTS or DNLI or LLY or PRAX or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +399.
3%, compared to -94. 1% for Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock (GUTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1203% versus GUTS's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GUTS or DNLI or LLY or PRAX or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock's 1. 88β — meaning GUTS is approximately 189% more volatile than LLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 7% for Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GUTS or DNLI or LLY or PRAX or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is pulling ahead at 44.
7% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LLY leads at 31. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GUTS or DNLI or LLY or PRAX or IQV?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 0. 0% for PRAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GUTS or DNLI or LLY or PRAX or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus Eli Lilly and Company's 0. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Eli Lilly and Company — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GUTS: 562. 5% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GUTS or DNLI or LLY or PRAX or IQV?
In this comparison, LLY (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. GUTS, DNLI, PRAX, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GUTS or DNLI or LLY or PRAX or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65), 0. 6% yield, +1203% 10Y return). Fractyl Health, Inc. Common Stock (GUTS) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1203%, GUTS: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GUTS and DNLI and LLY and PRAX and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GUTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DNLI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LLY is a large-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LLY pays a dividend while GUTS, DNLI, PRAX, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.