Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GWH vs FLUX vs NRGV vs STEM vs BE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GWH
ESS Tech, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-99.2%
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23M
5Y Perf.-90.0%
NRGV
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$716M
5Y Perf.-57.3%
STEM
Stem, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$74M
5Y Perf.-98.4%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$62.18B
5Y Perf.+856.2%

GWH vs FLUX vs NRGV vs STEM vs BE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GWH logoGWH
FLUX logoFLUX
NRGV logoNRGV
STEM logoSTEM
BE logoBE
IndustryElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsRenewable UtilitiesSoftware - InfrastructureElectrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$14M$23M$716M$74M$62.18B
Revenue (TTM)$1M$51M$217M$153M$2.45B
Net Income (TTM)$-45M$-6M$-115M$144M$6M
Gross Margin-29.0%32.1%22.1%36.3%31.1%
Operating Margin-46.2%-1.9%-35.8%-35.1%8.2%
Forward P/E123.6x
Total Debt$4M$16M$95M$369M$2.99B
Cash & Equiv.$14M$1M$58M$49M$2.45B

GWH vs FLUX vs NRGV vs STEM vs BELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GWH
FLUX
NRGV
STEM
BE
StockMar 21May 26Return
ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH)1000.8-99.2%
Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX)10010.0-90.0%
Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV)10042.7-57.3%
Stem, Inc. (STEM)1001.6-98.4%
Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE)100956.2+856.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GWH vs FLUX vs NRGV vs STEM vs BE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: STEM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. NRGV and BE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GWH
ESS Tech, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

GWH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.53, Low D/E 44.6%, current ratio 1.04x
  • Beta 2.53, current ratio 1.04x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

FLUX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • beta 2.30
  • Beta 2.30 vs STEM's 3.66
Best for: income & stability
NRGV
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

NRGV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
  • 340.9% revenue growth vs GWH's -74.9%
Best for: growth exposure
STEM
Stem, Inc.
The Value Play

STEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 94.2% margin vs GWH's -40.8%
  • 43.2% ROA vs GWH's -103.5%, ROIC -57.1% vs -5.5%
Best for: value and quality
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

BE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 9.3% 10Y total return vs NRGV's -57.1%
  • +14.6% vs GWH's -45.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNRGV logoNRGV340.9% revenue growth vs GWH's -74.9%
ValueSTEM logoSTEMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSTEM logoSTEM94.2% margin vs GWH's -40.8%
Stability / SafetyFLUX logoFLUXBeta 2.30 vs STEM's 3.66
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BE logoBE+14.6% vs GWH's -45.4%
Efficiency (ROA)STEM logoSTEM43.2% ROA vs GWH's -103.5%, ROIC -57.1% vs -5.5%

GWH vs FLUX vs NRGV vs STEM vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GWHESS Tech, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
65.1%$1M
Other Product Or Service
28.0%$444,000
Service
6.8%$108,000
FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NRGVEnergy Vault Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Intellectual Property Licensing
86.0%$3M
Software Licensing
14.0%$540,000
STEMStem, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
56.1%$88M
Hardware
43.9%$69M
BEBloom Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Product
75.6%$1.5B
Service
11.3%$228M
Installation
10.2%$206M
Electricity
3.0%$60M

GWH vs FLUX vs NRGV vs STEM vs BE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBELAGGINGSTEM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 2202.4x GWH's $1M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GWH's -40.8%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGWH logoGWHESS Tech, Inc.FLUX logoFLUXFlux Power Holdin…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$51M$217M$153M$2.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$47M-$212,000-$72M-$16M$240M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$45M-$6M-$115M$144M$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$68M-$7M-$98M-$8M$233M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-29.0%+32.1%+22.1%+36.3%+31.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-46.2%-1.9%-35.8%-35.1%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-40.8%-12.5%-53.0%+94.2%+0.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-60.8%-14.7%-45.2%-5.5%+9.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-78.6%-60.6%+156.4%-10.8%+130.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+64.0%-25.0%-42.9%+27.2%+3.3%
BE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — GWH and FLUX and STEM and BE each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricGWH logoGWHESS Tech, Inc.FLUX logoFLUXFlux Power Holdin…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Market CapShares × price$14M$23M$716M$74M$62.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3M$37M$752M$394M$62.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.26x-3.25x-6.37x-0.95x-699.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.123.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple508.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.91x0.34x3.52x0.48x30.72x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.90x7.50x78.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.82x1087.24x
Evenly matched — GWH and FLUX and STEM and BE each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — GWH and STEM and BE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-9 for GWH. GWH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BE's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLUX scores 6/9 vs GWH's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGWH logoGWHESS Tech, Inc.FLUX logoFLUXFlux Power Holdin…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.3%-7.4%-146.8%+0.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-103.5%-21.0%-40.3%+43.2%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.5%-30.1%-49.5%-57.1%+4.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-158.9%-53.7%-23.9%+2.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926464
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.45x1.07x3.77x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$11M$15M$36M$320M$538M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$14M$1M$58M$49M$2.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4M$16M$95M$369M$3.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.75x-2.64x-10.33x14.43x1.05x
Evenly matched — GWH and STEM and BE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $75 for GWH. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs GWH's -45.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs GWH's -59.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGWH logoGWHESS Tech, Inc.FLUX logoFLUXFlux Power Holdin…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-44.3%-8.5%-15.3%-48.6%+162.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-45.4%-31.9%+447.1%-16.2%+1464.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.1%-66.1%+140.7%-89.5%+1425.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.2%-86.4%-57.7%-97.8%+1013.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.2%-69.0%-57.1%-95.5%+934.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-59.1%-30.3%+34.0%-52.9%+148.0%
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLUX and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FLUX is the less volatile stock with a 2.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs GWH's 8.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGWH logoGWHESS Tech, Inc.FLUX logoFLUXFlux Power Holdin…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.53x2.30x3.08x3.66x3.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.87$7.55$6.35$32.23$302.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.76$0.97$0.65$5.93$16.18
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.1%+17.2%+65.2%+27.0%+85.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.757.853.351.272.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded520K114K3.7M155K10.1M
Evenly matched — FLUX and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GWH as "Hold", NRGV as "Buy", STEM as "Hold", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 238.4% upside for GWH (target: $4) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).

MetricGWH logoGWHESS Tech, Inc.FLUX logoFLUXFlux Power Holdin…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…STEM logoSTEMStem, Inc.BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.79$2.75$20.67$187.56
# AnalystsCovering analysts1171731
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BE leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallBloom Energy Corporation (BE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GWH vs FLUX vs NRGV vs STEM vs BE: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GWH or FLUX or NRGV or STEM or BE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 9% for ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH). Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — GWH or FLUX or NRGV or STEM or BE?

Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -99.

2% for ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus GWH's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — GWH or FLUX or NRGV or STEM or BE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flux Power Holdings, Inc.

(FLUX) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 30β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 59% more volatile than FLUX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 4% for Bloom Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — GWH or FLUX or NRGV or STEM or BE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -74. 9% for ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GWH leads at 21. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — GWH or FLUX or NRGV or STEM or BE?

Stem, Inc.

(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -40. 1% for ESS Tech, Inc. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BE leads at 3. 6% versus -35. 2% for GWH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STEM leads at 35. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is GWH or FLUX or NRGV or STEM or BE more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWH: 238.

4% to $3. 79.

07

Which pays a better dividend — GWH or FLUX or NRGV or STEM or BE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is GWH or FLUX or NRGV or STEM or BE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+934.

6% 10Y return). ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) carries a higher beta of 2. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +934. 6%, GWH: -99. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between GWH and FLUX and NRGV and STEM and BE?

These companies operate in different sectors (GWH (Industrials) and FLUX (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and STEM (Technology) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GWH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLUX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NRGV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 78%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STEM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 56%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 65%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GWH and FLUX and NRGV and STEM and BE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GWH: -78.6% · FLUX: -60.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.