Travel Lodging
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
H vs BKNG vs MAR vs EXPE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Lodging
Travel Services
H vs BKNG vs MAR vs EXPE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Travel Lodging | Travel Services | Travel Lodging | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $16.28B | $132.72B | $93.23B | $29.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.22B | $27.69B | $26.58B | $15.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $6.15B | $2.58B | $1.56B |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 100.0% | 21.4% | 88.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | 34.3% | 16.0% | 14.7% |
| Forward P/E | 53.0x | 16.3x | 30.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.80B | $19.29B | $17.08B | $6.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $788M | $17.20B | $358M | $6.98B |
H vs BKNG vs MAR vs EXPE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyatt Hotels Corpor… (H) | 100 | 309.4 | +209.4% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 261.2 | +161.2% |
| Marriott Internatio… (MAR) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) | 100 | 318.1 | +218.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: H vs BKNG vs MAR vs EXPE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
H is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 117.0%, EPS growth -104.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, current ratio 58.02x
- 117.0% revenue growth vs MAR's 4.3%
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.9%
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.33x
- 22.2% margin vs H's -0.5%
- Beta 0.74 vs EXPE's 1.47
MAR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 430.3% 10Y total return vs H's 254.9%
EXPE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 30.4x)
- +52.8% vs BKNG's -16.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 117.0% revenue growth vs MAR's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs H's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs EXPE's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MAR's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs BKNG's -16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs H's -0.2% |
H vs BKNG vs MAR vs EXPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
H vs BKNG vs MAR vs EXPE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXPE leads in 2 of 6 categories
BKNG leads 1 • H leads 0 • MAR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 4.4x H's $6.2B. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to H's -0.5%. On growth, H holds the edge at +108.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $27.7B | $26.6B | $15.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $899M | $10.2B | $4.5B | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | $6.2B | $2.6B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $63M | $9.0B | $3.1B | $4.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +100.0% | +21.4% | +88.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +34.3% | +16.0% | +14.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +22.2% | +9.7% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +32.6% | +11.7% | +32.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.7% | +16.2% | +6.2% | +14.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.0% | +2.4% | +0.8% | +96.8% |
Valuation Metrics
EXPE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.8x trailing earnings, EXPE trades at a 30% valuation discount to MAR's 37.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EXPE's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAR's 24.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.3B | $132.7B | $93.2B | $29.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.3B | $134.8B | $110.0B | $29.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -315.69x | 25.87x | 37.08x | 25.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.98x | 16.32x | 30.38x | 13.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.16x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.90x | 13.41x | 24.77x | 10.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.28x | 4.93x | 3.56x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.45x | — | — | 13.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 102.39x | 14.61x | 35.75x | 9.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPE delivers a 68.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $-1 for H. H carries lower financial leverage with a 1.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXPE's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAR scores 7/9 vs H's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.9% | — | — | +68.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +21.1% | +9.3% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | — | +25.0% | +40.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +75.4% | +22.6% | +23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | — | — | 2.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.0B | $2.1B | $16.7B | -$307M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $788M | $17.2B | $358M | $7.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $19.3B | $17.1B | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.28x | 7.21x | 5.20x | 16.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MAR and EXPE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAR five years ago would be worth $24,578 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,693 for EXPE. Over the past 12 months, EXPE leads with a +52.8% total return vs BKNG's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXPE at 40.2% vs H's 13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.1% | -19.4% | +12.5% | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.1% | -16.8% | +38.5% | +52.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.3% | +65.4% | +101.8% | +175.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.1% | +87.6% | +145.8% | +46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +254.9% | +250.7% | +430.3% | +130.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.5% | +18.3% | +26.4% | +40.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — H and BKNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXPE's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. H currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs BKNG's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 0.74x | 1.09x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $180.53 | $5129.83 | $380.00 | $303.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $121.94 | $150.62 | $250.79 | $148.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.4% | +3.3% | +92.6% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 42.4 | 53.7 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 785K | 8.7M | 1.5M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BKNG and MAR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: H as "Hold", BKNG as "Buy", MAR as "Hold", EXPE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 35.3% upside for BKNG (target: $232) vs 5.9% for MAR (target: $373). For income investors, BKNG offers the higher dividend yield at 0.89% vs H's 0.35%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $190.80 | $231.72 | $372.50 | $272.35 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 49 | 71 | 52 | 75 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $1.53 | $2.67 | $1.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +4.9% | +3.5% | +6.5% |
EXPE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BKNG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
H vs BKNG vs MAR vs EXPE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is H or BKNG or MAR or EXPE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the stronger pick with 117.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — H or BKNG or MAR or EXPE?
On trailing P/E, Expedia Group, Inc.
(EXPE) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus Marriott International, Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, Expedia Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — H or BKNG or MAR or EXPE?
Over the past 5 years, Marriott International, Inc.
(MAR) delivered a total return of +145. 8%, compared to +46. 9% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAR returned +430. 3% versus EXPE's +130. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — H or BKNG or MAR or EXPE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Expedia Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning EXPE is approximately 98% more volatile than BKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 131% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — H or BKNG or MAR or EXPE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is pulling ahead at 117.
0% versus 4. 3% for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marriott International, Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -104. 3% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, H leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — H or BKNG or MAR or EXPE?
Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus -0. 7% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus 7. 8% for H. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is H or BKNG or MAR or EXPE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Expedia Group, Inc.
(EXPE) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 53. 0x for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — 40. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKNG: 35. 3% to $231. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — H or BKNG or MAR or EXPE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) offers the highest yield at 0. 9%, versus 0. 4% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H).
09Is H or BKNG or MAR or EXPE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 9% yield, +250. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKNG: +250. 7%, H: +254. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between H and BKNG and MAR and EXPE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: H is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BKNG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MAR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BKNG, MAR, EXPE pay a dividend while H does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.