Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HAFC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HOPE vs SMBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HAFC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HOPE vs SMBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $908M | $613M | $2.78B | $1.60B | $773M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $445M | $233M | $643M | $968M | $305M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $76M | $63M | $209M | $59M | $65M |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 79.4% | 79.9% | 48.6% | 57.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.3% | 37.8% | 43.8% | 8.3% | 24.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 11.4x | 14.2x | 11.7x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $280M | $72M | $991M | $396M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $213M | $52M | $108M | $560M | $193M |
HAFC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HOPE vs SMBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 217.9 | +117.9% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
| Southern Missouri B… (SMBC) | 100 | 286.1 | +186.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HAFC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HOPE vs SMBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HAFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 3.6%
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.1x), PEG 0.76 vs 0.96
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HOPE's 4.4%
BCAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- PEG 0.36 vs CVBF's 4.48
- NIM 4.2% vs HOPE's 2.5%
- 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
CVBF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, HOPE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SMBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 209.1% 10Y total return vs BCAL's 133.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 26.1%, current ratio 1.09x
- Beta 0.86, yield 1.3%, current ratio 1.09x
- Beta 0.86 vs HOPE's 1.10
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.1x), PEG 0.76 vs 0.96 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs HOPE's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HOPE's 4.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.9% vs CVBF's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BCAL's 0.4% |
HAFC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HOPE vs SMBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HAFC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HOPE vs SMBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BCAL leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • SMBC leads 1 • HAFC leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOPE is the larger business by revenue, generating $968M annually — 4.2x BCAL's $233M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $445M | $233M | $643M | $968M | $305M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $110M | $92M | $294M | $84M | $91M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $76M | $63M | $209M | $59M | $65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $204M | $57M | $217M | $147M | $84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +79.4% | +79.9% | +48.6% | +57.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +37.8% | +43.8% | +8.3% | +24.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +27.1% | +32.5% | +6.0% | +19.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +45.8% | +24.4% | +33.8% | +15.6% | +24.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.7% | -2.0% | +11.1% | +35.0% | +24.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BCAL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, BCAL trades at a 64% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $908M | $613M | $2.8B | $1.6B | $773M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $976M | $633M | $3.7B | $1.4B | $722M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.10x | 9.88x | 13.49x | 27.22x | 13.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.61x | 11.42x | 14.24x | 11.70x | 11.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.95x | 0.31x | 4.25x | — | 1.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.59x | 7.19x | 13.02x | 17.18x | 8.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.04x | 2.63x | 4.33x | 1.66x | 2.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.08x | 1.21x | 0.71x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.46x | 10.77x | 12.81x | 10.58x | 10.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCAL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMBC delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVBF's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs HOPE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +11.4% | +9.3% | +2.6% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.6% | +1.4% | +0.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +10.6% | +6.8% | +2.3% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +5.0% | +9.3% | +0.9% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.12x | 0.43x | 0.17x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $68M | $20M | $883M | -$164M | -$51M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $213M | $52M | $108M | $560M | $193M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $280M | $72M | $991M | $396M | $142M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | 1.55x | 2.12x | 0.17x | 0.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HAFC and SMBC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMBC five years ago would be worth $16,971 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,800 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +36.9% total return vs CVBF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs BCAL's 13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | +3.3% | +10.9% | +15.3% | +19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.9% | +32.9% | +13.1% | +30.4% | +34.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.2% | +47.7% | +94.0% | +80.7% | +127.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.7% | +42.7% | +12.2% | -2.0% | +69.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.5% | +133.6% | +67.6% | +18.8% | +209.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.4% | +13.9% | +24.7% | +21.8% | +31.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SMBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMBC currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs BCAL's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.90x | 0.94x | 1.10x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.27 | $20.47 | $21.48 | $13.02 | $70.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.84 | $14.07 | $17.95 | $9.44 | $47.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +93.2% | +95.5% | +96.2% | +99.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 62.0 | 57.9 | 59.1 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 265K | 189K | 1.6M | 902K | 83K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HAFC and HOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HAFC as "Hold", BCAL as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", SMBC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 5.6% for SMBC (target: $74). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.39% vs BCAL's 0.52%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $22.00 | $24.75 | $14.50 | $73.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 3 | 16 | 6 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +0.5% | +4.0% | +4.4% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.09 | $0.10 | $0.82 | $0.55 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +1.0% | +2.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BCAL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HAFC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HOPE vs SMBC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HAFC or BCAL or CVBF or HOPE or SMBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HAFC or BCAL or CVBF or HOPE or SMBC?
On trailing P/E, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the cheapest at 9.
9x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 36x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HAFC or BCAL or CVBF or HOPE or SMBC?
Over the past 5 years, Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.
(SMBC) delivered a total return of +69. 7%, compared to -2. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMBC returned +209. 1% versus HOPE's +18. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HAFC or BCAL or CVBF or HOPE or SMBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.
(SMBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning HOPE is approximately 28% more volatile than SMBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 43% for CVB Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HAFC or BCAL or CVBF or HOPE or SMBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HAFC or BCAL or CVBF or HOPE or SMBC?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HAFC or BCAL or CVBF or HOPE or SMBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for CVB Financial Corp. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — HAFC or BCAL or CVBF or HOPE or SMBC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 0. 5% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL).
09Is HAFC or BCAL or CVBF or HOPE or SMBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.
(SMBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 1. 3% yield, +209. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMBC: +209. 1%, HOPE: +18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HAFC and BCAL and CVBF and HOPE and SMBC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SMBC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.