Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HBCP vs FFIN vs IBCP vs SFBS vs HOPE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HBCP vs FFIN vs IBCP vs SFBS vs HOPE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $504M | $4.59B | $711M | $4.34B | $1.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $209M | $739M | $315M | $1.02B | $968M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $243M | $69M | $277M | $59M |
| Gross Margin | 70.5% | 70.8% | 69.6% | 51.8% | 48.6% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | 36.8% | 25.8% | 33.6% | 8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 15.9x | 9.7x | 12.4x | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $197M | $117M | $1.51B | $396M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $763M | $52M | $95M | $560M |
HBCP vs FFIN vs IBCP vs SFBS vs HOPE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) | 100 | 271.2 | +171.2% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 249.8 | +149.8% |
| ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS) | 100 | 227.9 | +127.9% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 130.8 | +30.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBCP vs FFIN vs IBCP vs SFBS vs HOPE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBCP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth 28.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 13.3%, current ratio 0.27x
- PEG 0.70 vs FFIN's 3.04
- NIM 3.8% vs HOPE's 2.5%
FFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.81, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.4x)
SFBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 255.4% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 188.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs IBCP's 0.4%
HOPE is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs SFBS's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.1% vs FFIN's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs IBCP's 0.4% |
HBCP vs FFIN vs IBCP vs SFBS vs HOPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HBCP vs FFIN vs IBCP vs SFBS vs HOPE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 1 • HBCP leads 1 • SFBS leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 4.9x HBCP's $209M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $209M | $739M | $315M | $1.0B | $968M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $60M | $310M | $89M | $346M | $84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | $243M | $69M | $277M | $59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $44M | $290M | $70M | $256M | $147M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.5% | +70.8% | +69.6% | +51.8% | +48.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +36.8% | +25.8% | +33.6% | +8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +30.2% | +21.7% | +27.2% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +39.6% | +22.2% | — | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.7% | -7.7% | +2.3% | +32.8% | +35.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 61% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBCP offers better value at 0.71x vs FFIN's 3.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $504M | $4.6B | $711M | $4.3B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $420M | $4.0B | $775M | $5.8B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.98x | 20.68x | 10.56x | 15.71x | 26.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.91x | 15.85x | 9.72x | 12.44x | 11.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.71x | 3.97x | 2.01x | 1.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.25x | 14.10x | 9.54x | 16.81x | 17.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 6.21x | 2.25x | 4.27x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 2.88x | 1.43x | 2.35x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.37x | 15.67x | 10.13x | — | 10.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFBS delivers a 14.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFBS's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HBCP scores 9/9 vs HOPE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +13.3% | +14.2% | +14.9% | +2.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.6% | +1.3% | +1.6% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +11.0% | +10.2% | +7.3% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +16.0% | +2.6% | +4.5% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.12x | 0.23x | 0.81x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$84M | -$566M | $65M | $1.4B | -$164M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $763M | $52M | $95M | $560M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $197M | $117M | $1.5B | $396M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.96x | 1.48x | 0.91x | 0.75x | 0.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HBCP and IBCP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBCP five years ago would be worth $17,940 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,184 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, HBCP leads with a +29.1% total return vs FFIN's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.8% vs FFIN's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.2% | +8.1% | +9.0% | +11.7% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.1% | -5.3% | +11.7% | +8.3% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.2% | +28.6% | +134.2% | +78.7% | +81.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.4% | -28.2% | +68.5% | +29.0% | -0.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +159.7% | +144.5% | +188.6% | +255.4% | +19.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.0% | +8.8% | +32.8% | +21.3% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HBCP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFBS's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBCP currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.94x | 0.81x | 1.20x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $65.99 | $38.74 | $37.39 | $90.64 | $13.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.96 | $28.11 | $29.63 | $67.20 | $9.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +83.3% | +92.3% | +87.7% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 56.1 | 52.0 | 55.1 | 56.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 119K | 736K | 176K | 311K | 898K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and IBCP and HOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HBCP as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", SFBS as "Buy", HOPE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -22.4% for HBCP (target: $50). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.43% vs FFIN's 2.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $39.25 | $38.00 | $90.00 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +2.2% | +3.0% | — | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.72 | $1.03 | — | $0.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IBCP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HBCP vs FFIN vs IBCP vs SFBS vs HOPE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBCP or FFIN or IBCP or SFBS or HOPE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBCP or FFIN or IBCP or SFBS or HOPE?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
6x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 0x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 70x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBCP or FFIN or IBCP or SFBS or HOPE?
Over the past 5 years, Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) delivered a total return of +79. 4%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBS returned +255. 4% versus HOPE's +19. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBCP or FFIN or IBCP or SFBS or HOPE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning SFBS is approximately 53% more volatile than HBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 81% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBCP or FFIN or IBCP or SFBS or HOPE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 28. 4% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBCP or FFIN or IBCP or SFBS or HOPE?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBCP or FFIN or IBCP or SFBS or HOPE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 70x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 7% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBCP or FFIN or IBCP or SFBS or HOPE?
In this comparison, HOPE (4.
4% yield), IBCP (3. 0% yield), FFIN (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HBCP, SFBS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HBCP or FFIN or IBCP or SFBS or HOPE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
81), 3. 0% yield, +188. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +188. 6%, SFBS: +255. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBCP and FFIN and IBCP and SFBS and HOPE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFBS is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. FFIN, IBCP, HOPE pay a dividend while HBCP, SFBS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.