Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HCWC vs XWEL vs BTMD vs HIMS vs TALK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Personal Products & Services
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Care Facilities
HCWC vs XWEL vs BTMD vs HIMS vs TALK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Personal Products & Services | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $4M | $7M | $92M | $6.63B | $868M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $78M | $29M | $188M | $2.35B | $229M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-17M | $16M | $128M | $8M |
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 22.7% | 70.1% | 69.7% | 43.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | -32.0% | 15.4% | 4.6% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 2.8x | 51.5x | 38.2x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $12M | $110M | $1.12B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $3M | $24M | $229M | $37M |
HCWC vs XWEL vs BTMD vs HIMS vs TALK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Choice Well… (HCWC) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| XWELL, Inc. (XWEL) | 100 | 73.4 | -26.6% |
| biote Corp. (BTMD) | 100 | 37.5 | -62.5% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 139.3 | +39.3% |
| Talkspace, Inc. (TALK) | 100 | 247.8 | +147.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCWC vs XWEL vs BTMD vs HIMS vs TALK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCWC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 24.6%, EPS growth 55.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 83.5%
XWEL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 3.8%
- 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTMD's 2.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
BTMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (2.8x vs 38.2x)
- 8.3% margin vs XWEL's -58.2%
- 15.1% ROA vs XWEL's -84.7%, ROIC 11.3% vs -124.8%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs TALK's -48.7%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs XWEL's -13.8%
TALK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 0.86, current ratio 6.38x
- Beta 0.86 vs HIMS's 2.40
- +70.4% vs HIMS's -51.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs XWEL's -13.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.8x vs 38.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs XWEL's -58.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs HIMS's 2.40 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTMD's 2.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.4% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs XWEL's -84.7%, ROIC 11.3% vs -124.8% |
HCWC vs XWEL vs BTMD vs HIMS vs TALK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HCWC vs XWEL vs BTMD vs HIMS vs TALK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTMD leads in 2 of 6 categories
TALK leads 2 • HCWC leads 1 • XWEL leads 1 • HIMS leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 80.4x XWEL's $29M. BTMD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XWEL's -58.2%. On growth, HCWC holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $78M | $29M | $188M | $2.3B | $229M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | -$8M | $32M | $164M | $7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$17M | $16M | $128M | $8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$12M | $29M | $73M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.6% | +22.7% | +70.1% | +69.7% | +43.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -32.0% | +15.4% | +4.6% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | -58.2% | +8.3% | +5.5% | +3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | -40.0% | +15.2% | +3.1% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.5% | -4.2% | -8.3% | +28.4% | +29.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.0% | -105.0% | -83.8% | -27.3% | — |
Valuation Metrics
HCWC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.8x trailing earnings, BTMD trades at a 98% valuation discount to TALK's 129.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTMD's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TALK's 137.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $7M | $92M | $6.6B | $868M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $17M | $178M | $7.5B | $830M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.59x | -0.25x | 2.82x | 50.32x | 129.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 51.51x | 38.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 4.54x | 42.68x | 137.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.05x | 0.24x | 0.48x | 2.82x | 3.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | — | — | 12.25x | 7.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 3.05x | 89.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTMD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-74 for HCWC. HIMS carries lower financial leverage with a 2.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCWC's 10.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTMD scores 6/9 vs XWEL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -73.9% | — | — | +23.7% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.7% | -84.7% | +15.1% | +6.0% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.6% | -124.8% | +11.3% | +10.7% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | -129.5% | +53.3% | +10.9% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 10.72x | — | — | 2.07x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | $10M | $86M | $892M | -$37M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $3M | $24M | $229M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $12M | $110M | $1.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.15x | -128.64x | 3.02x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TALK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $504 for XWEL. Over the past 12 months, TALK leads with a +70.4% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TALK at 80.7% vs HCWC's -62.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +182.2% | -15.4% | -23.2% | +47.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.8% | +54.5% | -37.4% | -51.0% | +70.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -75.6% | -69.7% | +116.6% | +490.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -95.0% | -79.1% | +137.6% | -47.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -100.0% | -79.2% | +161.9% | -48.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.1% | -37.5% | -32.8% | +29.4% | +80.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TALK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TALK is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TALK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs HCWC's 29.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.66x | 0.88x | 1.73x | 2.40x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.98 | $2.20 | $4.75 | $70.43 | $5.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $0.26 | $1.27 | $13.74 | $2.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.1% | +57.7% | +44.0% | +36.4% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 53.4 | 62.2 | 54.5 | 62.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 500K | 2.3M | 265K | 34.9M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
XWEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIMS as "Hold", TALK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.6% upside for HIMS (target: $30) vs 1.4% for TALK (target: $5). For income investors, XWEL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.78% vs BTMD's 2.25%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $29.67 | $5.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 19 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% | +2.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.05 | $0.05 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +25.4% | +3.7% | +1.4% | +2.0% |
BTMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TALK leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
HCWC vs XWEL vs BTMD vs HIMS vs TALK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCWC or XWEL or BTMD or HIMS or TALK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for XWELL, Inc. (XWEL). biote Corp. (BTMD) offers the better valuation at 2. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCWC or XWEL or BTMD or HIMS or TALK?
On trailing P/E, biote Corp.
(BTMD) is the cheapest at 2. 8x versus Talkspace, Inc. at 129. 5x. On forward P/E, Talkspace, Inc. is actually cheaper at 38. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCWC or XWEL or BTMD or HIMS or TALK?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -95. 0% for XWELL, Inc. (XWEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus XWEL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCWC or XWEL or BTMD or HIMS or TALK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 179% more volatile than TALK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 11% for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCWC or XWEL or BTMD or HIMS or TALK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -13. 8% for XWELL, Inc. (XWEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: biote Corp. grew EPS 703. 5% year-over-year, compared to -38. 8% for XWELL, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCWC leads at 83. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCWC or XWEL or BTMD or HIMS or TALK?
biote Corp.
(BTMD) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 1% net margin versus -58. 2% for XWELL, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTMD leads at 18. 5% versus -32. 0% for XWEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTMD leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCWC or XWEL or BTMD or HIMS or TALK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Talkspace, Inc.
(TALK) trades at 38. 2x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HIMS: 15. 6% to $29. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCWC or XWEL or BTMD or HIMS or TALK?
In this comparison, XWEL (3.
8% yield), BTMD (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. HCWC, HIMS, TALK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HCWC or XWEL or BTMD or HIMS or TALK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, XWELL, Inc.
(XWEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 3. 8% yield). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XWEL: -100. 0%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCWC and XWEL and BTMD and HIMS and TALK?
These companies operate in different sectors (HCWC (Consumer Defensive) and XWEL (Consumer Cyclical) and BTMD (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and TALK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HCWC is a small-cap high-growth stock; XWEL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BTMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TALK is a small-cap high-growth stock. XWEL, BTMD pay a dividend while HCWC, HIMS, TALK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.