Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HFBL vs HFWA vs CZWI vs NBTB vs HBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HFBL vs HFWA vs CZWI vs NBTB vs HBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $60M | $932M | $203M | $2.35B | $512M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $336M | $90M | $867M | $209M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $68M | $14M | $169M | $46M |
| Gross Margin | 63.9% | 72.4% | 54.7% | 72.1% | 70.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 23.2% | 7.0% | 25.3% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 13.3x | 11.8x | 10.8x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $42M | $52M | $327M | $58M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $53M | $119M | $185M | $142M |
HFBL vs HFWA vs CZWI vs NBTB vs HBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Federal Bancor… (HFBL) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) | 100 | 275.3 | +175.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HFBL vs HFWA vs CZWI vs NBTB vs HBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HFBL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 7.2%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.19 vs HFWA's 0.97
- +57.8% vs NBTB's +9.0%
HFWA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 58.1%
- 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.32
HBCP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 163.2% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- PEG 0.71 vs HFBL's 4.68
- NIM 3.8% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs HFBL's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.53 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs HFBL's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs HFWA's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs HFBL's 0.5% |
HFBL vs HFWA vs CZWI vs NBTB vs HBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HFBL vs HFWA vs CZWI vs NBTB vs HBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
HFWA leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • HFBL leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HFWA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 26.8x HFBL's $32M. HBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HFBL's 12.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $336M | $90M | $867M | $209M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $80M | $9M | $241M | $60M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $68M | $14M | $169M | $46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $86M | $11M | $225M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.9% | +72.4% | +54.7% | +72.1% | +70.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +23.2% | +7.0% | +25.3% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +20.1% | +16.0% | +19.5% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +25.5% | +11.5% | +25.2% | +21.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.6% | +85.7% | +63.0% | +39.5% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, HBCP trades at a 28% valuation discount to HFBL's 15.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HBCP offers better value at 0.72x vs HFBL's 4.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60M | $932M | $203M | $2.4B | $512M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48M | $922M | $136M | $2.5B | $428M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.56x | 13.99x | 14.44x | 13.53x | 11.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.33x | 11.78x | 10.80x | 11.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.68x | 1.60x | 2.85x | 1.92x | 0.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.98x | 11.58x | 15.28x | 10.35x | 7.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 2.77x | 2.25x | 2.71x | 2.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | 1.02x | 1.09x | 1.21x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.11x | 10.88x | 19.55x | 10.75x | 11.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBCP delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for HFWA. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZWI's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +7.5% | +7.8% | +9.5% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +5.2% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +4.1% | +0.6% | +2.4% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.05x | 0.28x | 0.17x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$10M | -$67M | $142M | -$84M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $53M | $119M | $185M | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $42M | $52M | $327M | $58M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.87x | 0.16x | 1.05x | 0.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBCP five years ago would be worth $18,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,042 for HFWA. Over the past 12 months, HFBL leads with a +57.8% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs HFBL's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.6% | +17.7% | +21.5% | +9.3% | +14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.8% | +24.5% | +45.6% | +9.0% | +33.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.2% | +92.4% | +160.0% | +54.1% | +133.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.6% | +10.4% | +71.2% | +29.9% | +83.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +109.7% | +157.0% | +102.2% | +163.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.5% | +24.4% | +37.5% | +15.5% | +32.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HFBL and HBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HFBL is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HFWA's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBCP currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 0.97x | 0.46x | 0.89x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $28.90 | $22.62 | $46.92 | $65.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.32 | $21.32 | $12.83 | $39.20 | $47.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +94.9% | +93.2% | +96.1% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 54.6 | 63.7 | 57.3 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 289K | 40K | 236K | 120K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HFWA and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HFWA as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", HBCP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.3% upside for HFWA (target: $31) vs -23.5% for HBCP (target: $50). For income investors, HFWA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.46% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.33 | — | $46.00 | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 2 | 10 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +3.5% | +1.8% | +3.2% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.53 | $0.95 | $0.37 | $1.43 | $0.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +0.6% | +3.1% | +0.4% | +2.8% |
HBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HFWA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HFBL vs HFWA vs CZWI vs NBTB vs HBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HFBL or HFWA or CZWI or NBTB or HBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HFBL or HFWA or CZWI or NBTB or HBCP?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) is the cheapest at 11. 1x versus Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana at 15. 6x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HFBL or HFWA or CZWI or NBTB or HBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) delivered a total return of +83. 0%, compared to +10. 4% for Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HBCP returned +163. 2% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HFBL or HFWA or CZWI or NBTB or HBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Heritage Financial Corporation's 0. 97β — meaning HFWA is approximately 410% more volatile than HFBL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 28% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HFBL or HFWA or CZWI or NBTB or HBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Financial Corporation grew EPS 58. 1% year-over-year, compared to 7. 7% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HFBL or HFWA or CZWI or NBTB or HBCP?
Home Bancorp, Inc.
(HBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus 12. 0% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HBCP leads at 27. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HFBL or HFWA or CZWI or NBTB or HBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for Heritage Financial Corporation — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HFWA: 14. 3% to $31. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — HFBL or HFWA or CZWI or NBTB or HBCP?
In this comparison, HFWA (3.
5% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), HFBL (2. 7% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. HBCP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HFBL or HFWA or CZWI or NBTB or HBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 2. 7% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HFBL: +109. 8%, HBCP: +163. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HFBL and HFWA and CZWI and NBTB and HBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HFBL, HFWA, CZWI, NBTB pay a dividend while HBCP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.