Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs HOMB vs GBCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs HOMB vs GBCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $932M | $7.04B | $2.73B | $5.29B | $6.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $336M | $3.21B | $1.41B | $1.45B | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $68M | $550M | $243M | $458M | $239M |
| Gross Margin | 72.4% | 67.7% | 50.9% | 65.6% | 69.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 23.4% | 20.5% | 36.0% | 22.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 9.7x | 10.9x | 10.8x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $4.01B | $1.82B | $1.20B | $2.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $53M | $511M | $657M | $910M | $322M |
HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs HOMB vs GBCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Financial … (HFWA) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Glacier Bancorp, In… (GBCI) | 100 | 118.5 | +18.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs HOMB vs GBCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HFWA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 109.7% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 1.18x
- PEG 1.53 vs HOMB's 3.55
- Beta 0.97, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.18x
COLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 15.8x)
- 3.8% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8%
- +32.6% vs HOMB's -1.9%
WAFD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.81 vs COLB's 1.37
HOMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.8% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5%
GBCI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 18.5%
- 14.5% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.5% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 15.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs COLB's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HFWA's 0.5% |
HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs HOMB vs GBCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs HOMB vs GBCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories
COLB leads 1 • HFWA leads 1 • WAFD leads 1 • GBCI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 9.6x HFWA's $336M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $336M | $3.2B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $80M | $895M | $277M | $601M | $365M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $68M | $550M | $243M | $458M | $239M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $86M | $724M | $226M | $354M | $337M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.4% | +67.7% | +50.9% | +65.6% | +69.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +23.4% | +20.5% | +36.0% | +22.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +17.1% | +16.0% | +27.7% | +16.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +22.0% | +14.8% | +29.1% | +24.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +85.7% | +5.9% | +46.3% | +26.0% | -9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
COLB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, COLB trades at a 48% valuation discount to GBCI's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HFWA offers better value at 1.60x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $932M | $7.0B | $2.7B | $5.3B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $922M | $10.5B | $3.9B | $5.6B | $8.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.99x | 12.85x | 13.56x | 13.36x | 24.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.33x | 9.65x | 10.93x | 10.82x | 15.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.60x | — | 4.41x | 4.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.58x | 11.76x | 12.98x | 10.12x | 24.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 2.19x | 1.93x | 3.64x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 1.12x | 0.94x | 1.36x | 1.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.88x | 9.97x | 13.09x | 12.53x | 18.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for GBCI. HFWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GBCI's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFWA scores 9/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.5% | +8.4% | +8.0% | +10.9% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.9% | +1.0% | +2.0% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +5.4% | +3.9% | +7.2% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +2.0% | +5.7% | +9.8% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.51x | 0.60x | 0.30x | 0.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $3.5B | $1.2B | $292M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $53M | $511M | $657M | $910M | $322M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $4.0B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | 0.82x | 0.48x | 1.44x | 0.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HFWA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,185 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +32.6% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HFWA at 24.4% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.7% | +6.2% | +11.9% | -3.0% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.5% | +32.6% | +28.5% | -1.9% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.4% | +75.3% | +51.6% | +42.0% | +84.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | -18.1% | +22.5% | +6.6% | -9.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.7% | +51.1% | +84.4% | +58.2% | +145.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.4% | +20.6% | +14.9% | +12.4% | +22.7% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.37x | 0.81x | 0.82x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.90 | $32.70 | $36.12 | $30.83 | $53.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.32 | $21.91 | $26.31 | $25.68 | $39.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +90.4% | +98.8% | +87.1% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 60.4 | 68.3 | 50.3 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 289K | 2.7M | 661K | 1.4M | 872K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COLB and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HFWA as "Buy", COLB as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", GBCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, COLB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.82% vs GBCI's 2.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.33 | $32.92 | $35.00 | $32.00 | $57.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 19 | 11 | 19 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +3.8% | +3.0% | +2.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 7 | 21 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.95 | $1.13 | $1.05 | $0.75 | $1.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.5% | +3.7% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COLB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HFWA vs COLB vs WAFD vs HOMB vs GBCI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HFWA or COLB or WAFD or HOMB or GBCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Glacier Bancorp, Inc.
(GBCI) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HFWA or COLB or WAFD or HOMB or GBCI?
On trailing P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus Glacier Bancorp, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Heritage Financial Corporation wins at 1. 53x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HFWA or COLB or WAFD or HOMB or GBCI?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +22. 5%, compared to -18. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GBCI returned +145. 4% versus COLB's +51. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HFWA or COLB or WAFD or HOMB or GBCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning COLB is approximately 68% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 69% for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HFWA or COLB or WAFD or HOMB or GBCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glacier Bancorp, Inc.
(GBCI) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Financial Corporation grew EPS 58. 1% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HFWA or COLB or WAFD or HOMB or GBCI?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HFWA or COLB or WAFD or HOMB or GBCI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HFWA or COLB or WAFD or HOMB or GBCI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 6% for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI).
09Is HFWA or COLB or WAFD or HOMB or GBCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +84. 4%, COLB: +51. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HFWA and COLB and WAFD and HOMB and GBCI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; GBCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.