Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HIPO
Hippo Holdings Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$713M
5Y Perf.-89.0%
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.07B
5Y Perf.-51.6%
ROOT
Root, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$772M
5Y Perf.-71.7%
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$258M
5Y Perf.+110.9%
HGTY
Hagerty, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.46B
5Y Perf.+2.2%

HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HIPO logoHIPO
LMND logoLMND
ROOT logoROOT
KINS logoKINS
HGTY logoHGTY
IndustryInsurance - SpecialtyInsurance - Property & CasualtyInsurance - Property & CasualtyInsurance - Property & CasualtyInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$713M$4.07B$772M$258M$3.46B
Revenue (TTM)$480M$821M$1.56B$201M$1.42B
Net Income (TTM)$113M$-139M$56M$31M$12M
Gross Margin40.5%47.6%17.9%38.7%62.9%
Operating Margin24.2%-16.3%4.1%19.6%7.5%
Forward P/E114.1x28.1x7.2x98.6x
Total Debt$52M$182M$201M$11M$233M
Cash & Equiv.$250M$385M$690M$29M$299M

HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HIPO
LMND
ROOT
KINS
HGTY
StockJun 21May 26Return
Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO)10011.0-89.0%
Lemonade, Inc. (LMND)10048.4-51.6%
Root, Inc. (ROOT)10028.3-71.7%
Kingstone Companies… (KINS)100210.9+110.9%
Hagerty, Inc. (HGTY)100102.2+2.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KINS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Lemonade, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. HGTY also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HIPO
Hippo Holdings Inc.
The Insurance Play

HIPO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

LMND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.

  • 40.2% revenue growth vs KINS's 7.6%
  • +74.9% vs ROOT's -60.0%
Best for: growth and momentum
ROOT
Root, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

ROOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 29.0%, EPS growth 22.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.6%
Best for: growth exposure
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

KINS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.28
  • 104.9% 10Y total return vs HGTY's 3.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 2.73x
  • Beta 0.28, current ratio 2.73x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
HGTY
Hagerty, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

HGTY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLMND logoLMND40.2% revenue growth vs KINS's 7.6%
ValueKINS logoKINSLower P/E (7.2x vs 98.6x)
Quality / MarginsKINS logoKINSCombined ratio 0.8 vs LMND's 1.2 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyKINS logoKINSBeta 0.28 vs LMND's 2.75, lower leverage
DividendsHGTY logoHGTY0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LMND logoLMND+74.9% vs ROOT's -60.0%
Efficiency (ROA)KINS logoKINS7.9% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 34.9% vs -36.8%

HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HIPOHippo Holdings Inc.
FY 2024
Services Segment
100.0%$48M
LMNDLemonade, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$738M
ROOTRoot, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KINSKingstone Companies, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$148M
HGTYHagerty, Inc.
FY 2025
Commission Revenue And Fee Revenue
85.5%$486M
Membership And Other Revenue
14.5%$82M

HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKINSLAGGINGHGTY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HIPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ROOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 7.8x KINS's $201M. HIPO is the more profitable business, keeping 23.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMND's -16.9%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.KINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$480M$821M$1.6B$201M$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$116M-$121M$73M$42M$134M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$113M-$139M$56M$31M$12M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$50M$20M$181M$73M$165M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.5%+47.6%+17.9%+38.7%+62.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+24.2%-16.3%+4.1%+19.6%+7.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.4%-16.9%+3.6%+15.7%+0.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.4%+2.4%+11.6%+36.6%+11.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.2%+55.0%+12.6%+36.5%-2.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+114.1%+45.3%+95.3%+34.5%-191.2%
HIPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.1x trailing earnings, KINS trades at a 59% valuation discount to HGTY's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROOT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HGTY's 19.2x.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.KINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$713M$4.1B$772M$258M$3.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$515M$3.9B$283M$240M$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.34x-23.04x24.58x11.11x27.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.114.13x28.09x7.15x98.63x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.14x5.38x9.34x19.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.52x5.52x0.51x1.66x2.37x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.63x7.13x2.39x3.06x4.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF78.35x4.01x4.64x17.78x
ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KINS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KINS delivers a 35.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LMND. HIPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROOT's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KINS scores 7/9 vs LMND's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.KINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+27.4%-26.5%+15.4%+35.8%+1.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.0%-7.4%+3.7%+7.9%+0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+22.8%-36.8%+34.9%+17.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%-22.7%+3.8%+6.9%+7.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954676
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.34x0.51x0.17x0.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$198M-$203M-$489M-$17M-$66M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$250M$385M$690M$29M$299M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$52M$182M$201M$11M$233M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.86x40.01x115.40x
KINS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KINS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KINS five years ago would be worth $19,446 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,107 for HIPO. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +74.9% total return vs ROOT's -60.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KINS at 128.6% vs HGTY's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.KINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.6%-30.2%-22.4%+1.5%-23.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+14.0%+74.9%-60.0%-10.8%+13.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+48.1%+226.0%+893.7%+1094.2%+6.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.9%-30.4%-70.1%+94.5%+3.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.5%-23.6%-88.7%+104.9%+3.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.0%+48.3%+115.0%+128.6%+2.1%
KINS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KINS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KINS is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KINS currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs ROOT's 33.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.KINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.40x2.75x2.30x0.28x0.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$38.98$99.90$162.99$22.40$14.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.92$28.71$40.91$13.08$8.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.3%+53.1%+33.8%+73.4%+71.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.241.956.343.243.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded113K1.9M326K112K170K
KINS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: HIPO as "Buy", LMND as "Buy", ROOT as "Hold", KINS as "Buy", HGTY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.3% upside for HGTY (target: $14) vs 3.6% for HIPO (target: $28). HGTY is the only dividend payer here at 0.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHIPO logoHIPOHippo Holdings In…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.ROOT logoROOTRoot, Inc.KINS logoKINSKingstone Compani…HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.38$72.67$75.00$14.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts6151445
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KINS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HIPO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).

Best OverallKingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?

On trailing P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) is the cheapest at 11. 1x versus Hagerty, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?

Over the past 5 years, Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) delivered a total return of +94. 5%, compared to -88. 9% for Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KINS returned +104. 9% versus HIPO's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately 900% more volatile than KINS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 51% for Root, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 7. 6% for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kingstone Companies, Inc. grew EPS 359. 6% year-over-year, compared to 19. 3% for Lemonade, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?

Hippo Holdings Inc.

(HIPO) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KINS leads at 15. 0% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HGTY leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 114. 1x for Hippo Holdings Inc. — 107. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HGTY: 42. 3% to $14. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?

In this comparison, HGTY (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. HIPO, LMND, ROOT, KINS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kingstone Companies, Inc.

(KINS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), +104. 9% 10Y return). Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KINS: +104. 9%, ROOT: -88. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HIPO and LMND and ROOT and KINS and HGTY?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HIPO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; ROOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; KINS is a small-cap deep-value stock; HGTY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HIPO

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ROOT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KINS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HGTY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HIPO and LMND and ROOT and KINS and HGTY on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HIPO: 10.2% · LMND: 55.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.