Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $713M | $4.07B | $772M | $258M | $3.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $480M | $821M | $1.56B | $201M | $1.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $113M | $-139M | $56M | $31M | $12M |
| Gross Margin | 40.5% | 47.6% | 17.9% | 38.7% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 24.2% | -16.3% | 4.1% | 19.6% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 114.1x | — | 28.1x | 7.2x | 98.6x |
| Total Debt | $52M | $182M | $201M | $11M | $233M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250M | $385M | $690M | $29M | $299M |
HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) | 100 | 11.0 | -89.0% |
| Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
| Root, Inc. (ROOT) | 100 | 28.3 | -71.7% |
| Kingstone Companies… (KINS) | 100 | 210.9 | +110.9% |
| Hagerty, Inc. (HGTY) | 100 | 102.2 | +2.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIPO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LMND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 40.2% revenue growth vs KINS's 7.6%
- +74.9% vs ROOT's -60.0%
ROOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 29.0%, EPS growth 22.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 69.6%
KINS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.28
- 104.9% 10Y total return vs HGTY's 3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 2.73x
- Beta 0.28, current ratio 2.73x
HGTY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs KINS's 7.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 98.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs LMND's 1.2 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs LMND's 2.75, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.9% vs ROOT's -60.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 34.9% vs -36.8% |
HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KINS leads in 3 of 6 categories
HIPO leads 1 • ROOT leads 1 • LMND leads 0 • HGTY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIPO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 7.8x KINS's $201M. HIPO is the more profitable business, keeping 23.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMND's -16.9%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $480M | $821M | $1.6B | $201M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $116M | -$121M | $73M | $42M | $134M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $113M | -$139M | $56M | $31M | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $50M | $20M | $181M | $73M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.5% | +47.6% | +17.9% | +38.7% | +62.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | -16.3% | +4.1% | +19.6% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | -16.9% | +3.6% | +15.7% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +2.4% | +11.6% | +36.6% | +11.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.2% | +55.0% | +12.6% | +36.5% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.1% | +45.3% | +95.3% | +34.5% | -191.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, KINS trades at a 59% valuation discount to HGTY's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROOT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HGTY's 19.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $713M | $4.1B | $772M | $258M | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $515M | $3.9B | $283M | $240M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.34x | -23.04x | 24.58x | 11.11x | 27.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 114.13x | — | 28.09x | 7.15x | 98.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.14x | — | 5.38x | 9.34x | 19.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.52x | 5.52x | 0.51x | 1.66x | 2.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.63x | 7.13x | 2.39x | 3.06x | 4.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.35x | — | 4.01x | 4.64x | 17.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KINS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KINS delivers a 35.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LMND. HIPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROOT's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KINS scores 7/9 vs LMND's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.4% | -26.5% | +15.4% | +35.8% | +1.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | -7.4% | +3.7% | +7.9% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.8% | -36.8% | — | +34.9% | +17.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | -22.7% | +3.8% | +6.9% | +7.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.34x | 0.51x | 0.17x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$198M | -$203M | -$489M | -$17M | -$66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250M | $385M | $690M | $29M | $299M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $182M | $201M | $11M | $233M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 1.86x | 40.01x | 115.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KINS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KINS five years ago would be worth $19,446 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,107 for HIPO. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +74.9% total return vs ROOT's -60.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KINS at 128.6% vs HGTY's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.6% | -30.2% | -22.4% | +1.5% | -23.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.0% | +74.9% | -60.0% | -10.8% | +13.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.1% | +226.0% | +893.7% | +1094.2% | +6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -30.4% | -70.1% | +94.5% | +3.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | -23.6% | -88.7% | +104.9% | +3.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.0% | +48.3% | +115.0% | +128.6% | +2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
KINS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KINS is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KINS currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs ROOT's 33.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 2.75x | 2.30x | 0.28x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.98 | $99.90 | $162.99 | $22.40 | $14.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.92 | $28.71 | $40.91 | $13.08 | $8.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +53.1% | +33.8% | +73.4% | +71.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 41.9 | 56.3 | 43.2 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 113K | 1.9M | 326K | 112K | 170K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIPO as "Buy", LMND as "Buy", ROOT as "Hold", KINS as "Buy", HGTY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.3% upside for HGTY (target: $14) vs 3.6% for HIPO (target: $28). HGTY is the only dividend payer here at 0.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.38 | $72.67 | $75.00 | — | $14.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 | 14 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KINS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HIPO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
HIPO vs LMND vs ROOT vs KINS vs HGTY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?
On trailing P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the cheapest at 11. 1x versus Hagerty, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Kingstone Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?
Over the past 5 years, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) delivered a total return of +94. 5%, compared to -88. 9% for Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KINS returned +104. 9% versus HIPO's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 75β — meaning LMND is approximately 900% more volatile than KINS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 51% for Root, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 7. 6% for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kingstone Companies, Inc. grew EPS 359. 6% year-over-year, compared to 19. 3% for Lemonade, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?
Hippo Holdings Inc.
(HIPO) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KINS leads at 15. 0% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HGTY leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 114. 1x for Hippo Holdings Inc. — 107. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HGTY: 42. 3% to $14. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY?
In this comparison, HGTY (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. HIPO, LMND, ROOT, KINS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HIPO or LMND or ROOT or KINS or HGTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kingstone Companies, Inc.
(KINS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), +104. 9% 10Y return). Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KINS: +104. 9%, ROOT: -88. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIPO and LMND and ROOT and KINS and HGTY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HIPO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; ROOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; KINS is a small-cap deep-value stock; HGTY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.